發(fā)布時間：2018-03-17 07:52

  本文選題：信用　切入點：信用權(quán)　出處：《廣東財經(jīng)大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：信用經(jīng)濟時代已經(jīng)來臨,我國已經(jīng)打破原有的計劃經(jīng)濟體制開始逐步建立市場經(jīng)濟。在原有的計劃經(jīng)濟體制之下,我國缺乏信用習慣,信用意識薄弱,而信用是維持市場經(jīng)濟運行的重要機制,作為降低交易成本和提高交易的有效手段,現(xiàn)如今信用利益并未成為我國的一項民事權(quán)利,只是涵蓋在名譽權(quán)或商譽權(quán)之中間接進行保護。隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展和法制經(jīng)濟的倡導,建立信用法律制度的呼聲越來越高,我國已經(jīng)逐步在進行信用體系建設(shè),信用利益事關(guān)權(quán)利主體的切身利益,將信用利益獨立出來上升為一項權(quán)利,具有現(xiàn)實的緊迫性和必要性。本文的寫作目的主要是論證為何要將信用權(quán)從名譽權(quán)和商譽權(quán)之中獨立出來,并提出建議如何在民法中更好地保護信用權(quán),以期更好地保護權(quán)利主體的信用利益,構(gòu)建良好的信用法制環(huán)境。文章正文共分為四個部分,第一部分運用概念和分析的方法介紹了信用和信用權(quán)的內(nèi)涵,重點分析了信用權(quán)的法律性質(zhì),最后闡述了學者關(guān)于信用權(quán)獨立化的不同觀點以及我國在信用權(quán)立法的嘗試,為全文奠定理論基礎(chǔ)。第二部分從國外信用權(quán)相關(guān)立法出發(fā),介紹了英美法系和大陸法系的典型國家和地區(qū)信用權(quán)相關(guān)立法,其次對域外信用權(quán)立法加以評述,并總結(jié)我國從這些國家和地區(qū)能夠借鑒的有益經(jīng)驗,為我國信用權(quán)法律制度的建設(shè)指明方向。第三部分進行信用權(quán)獨立化的論證,介紹了我國信用權(quán)的保護現(xiàn)狀和存在的缺陷,分析了信用權(quán)與名譽權(quán)和商譽權(quán)的區(qū)別,最后闡述了信用權(quán)的必要性和可行性。最后一部分從信用權(quán)民法保護角度出發(fā)從信用權(quán)確權(quán)、信用權(quán)救濟、以及信用權(quán)相關(guān)配套措施的完善方面提出具體建設(shè)意見,建議在民法典中確立信用權(quán)的獨立人格地位,以期更好地保障信用權(quán),建立完善的信用權(quán)法律制度,為我國市場經(jīng)濟保駕護航。
[Abstract]:The era of credit economy has come, and our country has broken the old planned economy system and started to set up a market economy step by step. Under the original planned economy system, our country lacks the credit habit and the credit consciousness is weak. Credit is an important mechanism to maintain the operation of the market economy. As an effective means to reduce transaction costs and improve transactions, nowadays, credit interests have not become a civil right in our country. With the development of the market economy and the advocacy of the legal economy in China, the voice of establishing the credit legal system is getting higher and higher, and our country has been carrying out the construction of the credit system step by step. The credit interest is related to the vital interests of the subject of the right, and the independence of the credit interest is a right. The purpose of this paper is to prove why the credit right should be independent from the right of reputation and goodwill, and put forward some suggestions on how to better protect the credit right in the civil law. The text is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the connotation of credit and credit right by means of concept and analysis. This paper mainly analyzes the legal nature of credit right, and finally expounds the different viewpoints of scholars on the independence of credit right and the attempt of our country in the legislation of credit right. The second part sets out from the relevant legislation of foreign credit right. This paper introduces the relevant legislation of credit right of typical countries and regions in Anglo-American law system and continental law system, then comments on the legislation of foreign credit right, and sums up the beneficial experience that our country can learn from these countries and regions. The third part demonstrates the independence of credit right, introduces the present situation and defects of credit right protection in our country, and analyzes the difference between credit right and reputation right and goodwill right. Finally, the necessity and feasibility of credit right are expounded. In the last part, from the angle of civil law protection of credit right, concrete construction suggestions are put forward from the aspects of credit right confirmation, credit right relief, and the perfection of relevant measures of credit right. It is suggested that the independent personality status of credit right should be established in the Civil Code in order to better protect credit right, establish a perfect legal system of credit right, and guarantee the market economy of our country.
【學位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 任軍成;;論信用權(quán)的法律保護[J];天中學刊;2010年04期

2 鐘靜宜;;淺析網(wǎng)絡(luò)不正當競爭行為及其法律規(guī)制[J];法制與社會;2009年01期

3 任丹麗;;論信用權(quán)的民法保護[J];湖北社會科學;2008年08期

4 趙萬一;胡大武;;信用權(quán)保護立法研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2008年02期

5 陳滿玉;;信用權(quán)法律問題探析[J];中山大學學報論叢;2007年12期

6 李紅玲;;論信用權(quán)的若干問題[J];政治與法律;2006年04期

7 清格樂;;論信用權(quán)[J];前沿;2006年05期

8 陶丹;試析信用權(quán)及我國信用權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建[J];長白學刊;2005年04期

9 呂杰,朱呈義,袁勇玲;論信用權(quán)在我國民法典中的確立[J];南陽師范學院學報(社會科學版);2005年05期

10 藍壽榮,陳冰竹;美國個人信用制度及其對我國的借鑒意義[J];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2004年01期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 胡大武;侵害信用權(quán)民事責任研究[D];西南政法大學;2008年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前7條

1 馬艷艷;信用權(quán)獨立化的法律思考[D];山東經(jīng)濟學院;2011年

2 朱玲玲;論信用權(quán)的民法保護[D];復旦大學;2009年

3 劉海玉;信用權(quán)及其獨立化研究[D];中南大學;2007年

4 徐欣彥;論信用權(quán)及其民事立法完善[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2006年

5 鄒俊彬;建立我國信用權(quán)法律制度的思考[D];四川大學;2005年

6 崔維;論信用權(quán)的內(nèi)涵及其法律保護[D];山東大學;2005年

7 楊冬風;信用權(quán)權(quán)利性質(zhì)及其立法保護問題研究[D];華東政法學院;2004年

，

本文編號：1623836