本文選題：越權(quán)代表　切入點(diǎn)：表見(jiàn)代表　出處：《學(xué)術(shù)論壇》2015年05期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：《合同法》對(duì)法定代表人的越權(quán)代表行為效力的認(rèn)定過(guò)于簡(jiǎn)單。為了正確認(rèn)定越權(quán)代表行為的效力,首先需要界定能對(duì)法定代表人權(quán)利施加限制的范圍,然后類(lèi)推適用無(wú)權(quán)代理制度分析,按照表見(jiàn)制度與狹義無(wú)權(quán)制度的類(lèi)型化來(lái)處理越權(quán)代表行為的效力。對(duì)越權(quán)代表行為效力不被追認(rèn)時(shí)的責(zé)任分擔(dān),應(yīng)當(dāng)由越權(quán)行為人與惡意第三人在各自的過(guò)錯(cuò)范圍內(nèi)承擔(dān)責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:In order to correctly identify the validity of the ultra vires representative act, it is necessary to define the scope within which the legal representative's rights can be restricted. Then it applies the analysis of unauthorized agent system by analogy, and deals with the effectiveness of ultra vires representative act according to the classification of apparent system and narrow sense right system, and shares the responsibility when the validity of ultra vires representative act is not ratified. The perpetrator and the malicious third party shall bear the responsibility within the limits of their respective fault.
【作者單位】： 廣西警官高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923
，

本文編號(hào)：1609004