本文選題：平等保護產(chǎn)權　切入點：思想根源　出處：《河北學刊》2017年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：不平等保護產(chǎn)權不僅會造成經(jīng)濟危害,同時也會造成政治、文化和社會性危害。消除產(chǎn)權保護的歧視現(xiàn)象,單靠法律法規(guī)是不夠的,還必須進一步挖掘并清理其產(chǎn)生的錯誤思想根源。錯誤思想源于兩個方面:一是對中國現(xiàn)階段社會形態(tài)的定位不正確,中國正處于社會主義初級階段而不是高級階段,生產(chǎn)力水平還比較低,為了適應這種生產(chǎn)力狀況,我們需要各種規(guī)模和不同性質的所有制經(jīng)濟。只有把公有制經(jīng)濟與非公有制經(jīng)濟在政治上平等對待,才能鞏固產(chǎn)權平等思想,因為政治平等才有法律平等和產(chǎn)權平等。二是錯誤地認為中國現(xiàn)階段社會的主要矛盾是無產(chǎn)階級同資產(chǎn)階級的矛盾,但實際上是人民日益增長的物質文化需要同落后的社會生產(chǎn)之間的矛盾。執(zhí)政黨要團結一切可以團結的力量解決這一矛盾,這一矛盾的解決有助于夯實黨的領導。平等保護產(chǎn)權有助于對這一矛盾的解決,因而平等保護產(chǎn)權有助于夯實黨的領導。因此,不平等保護產(chǎn)權是錯誤的、有害的。
[Abstract]:Unequal protection of property rights not only causes economic harm, but also causes political, cultural and social harm. It is not enough to eliminate discrimination in property rights protection by laws and regulations alone. It is also necessary to further explore and clean up the root causes of its erroneous thinking, which originates from two aspects: first, the incorrect positioning of the present social formation in China, which is in the primary stage of socialism rather than the advanced stage. The level of productive forces is still relatively low. In order to adapt to this kind of productive forces, we need ownership economies of all sizes and different natures. Only when we treat the public sector economy and the non-public sector economy politically equally, can we consolidate the idea of equal property rights. It is because of political equality that there is equality between law and property rights. Second, it is wrongly believed that the principal contradiction in Chinese society at the present stage is the contradiction between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. In fact, however, it is the contradiction between the growing material and cultural needs of the people and the backward social production. The ruling party must unite all forces that can unite to resolve this contradiction. The solution of this contradiction is helpful to consolidate the leadership of the Party. Equal protection of property rights is helpful to solve this contradiction, so equal protection of property rights is helpful to consolidate the leadership of the Party. Therefore, unequal protection of property rights is wrong and harmful.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學經(jīng)濟與管理學院;
【基金】：2012年度國家社會科學基金項目《中國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展道路的獨特競爭優(yōu)勢研究》(12BJL009)
【分類號】：D923.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 賈成寬;;刑法對國有資產(chǎn)平等保護的正當性分析[J];大家;2012年12期

2 阮興文;;城市化中農民房地的征收與保護[J];開放導報;2011年02期

3 徐順東;;“知情同意”視野下醫(yī)患雙方權益的平等保護[J];法制與社會;2009年07期

4 姜t，

本文編號：1604721