本文選題：債權(quán)讓與　切入點(diǎn)：權(quán)利歸屬　出處：《河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家麥克勞德曾說(shuō),“假如問(wèn)我們誰(shuí)是對(duì)社會(huì)財(cái)富影響最為深刻的人?在經(jīng)過(guò)深思后我們會(huì)篤定的答道——最先發(fā)現(xiàn)債權(quán)能夠交易的人�！爆F(xiàn)代交易不再局限于實(shí)物交易,債權(quán)作為一種無(wú)形財(cái)產(chǎn),作為一種交易客體日益引發(fā)關(guān)注。伴隨著債權(quán)財(cái)產(chǎn)價(jià)值的突顯,債權(quán)的財(cái)產(chǎn)功能日受重視,對(duì)債權(quán)讓與的安全性有了更高的要求。債權(quán)多重讓與問(wèn)題,作為一種威脅債權(quán)安全讓與的問(wèn)題,顯然有悖于債權(quán)交易安全的要求、違反誠(chéng)實(shí)守信的民法原則,沖擊穩(wěn)定發(fā)展的經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序和社會(huì)秩序。該問(wèn)題不但已經(jīng)走入人們?nèi)粘Ｉ?也引起了學(xué)界的廣泛關(guān)注。如何解決債權(quán)糾紛,明確債權(quán)多重讓與發(fā)生時(shí)的權(quán)利歸屬、平衡債權(quán)讓與當(dāng)事人之間的利益,維護(hù)經(jīng)濟(jì)生活的穩(wěn)定有序已經(jīng)刻不容緩。因此,在修訂民法典這個(gè)大背景下,本文力圖對(duì)債權(quán)多重讓與下的權(quán)利歸屬問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究,希望引起立法者對(duì)于債權(quán)多重讓與問(wèn)題的關(guān)注。在完善民法立法的契機(jī)下,填補(bǔ)我國(guó)立法關(guān)于此問(wèn)題的漏洞,找到有利于債權(quán)讓與的立法之路,促使債權(quán)功能實(shí)現(xiàn)。本文采用法理解釋學(xué),比較法學(xué)和實(shí)踐研究的方法對(duì)債權(quán)多重讓與下的權(quán)利歸屬問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討。立足我國(guó)立法現(xiàn)狀和實(shí)踐,指出我國(guó)關(guān)于債權(quán)多重讓與問(wèn)題的立法狀態(tài),在綜合分析國(guó)外關(guān)于此問(wèn)題的先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)的同時(shí),為如何完善我國(guó)債權(quán)多重讓與立法以啟示和借鑒。在完善債權(quán)讓與及債權(quán)多重讓與立法的前提下,提出建立符合我國(guó)國(guó)情的債權(quán)多重讓與權(quán)利歸屬制度或者規(guī)則的建議,引導(dǎo)債權(quán)讓與的健康有序發(fā)展。本文共分為五部分對(duì)債權(quán)多重讓與下的權(quán)利歸屬進(jìn)行詳細(xì)論述:第一部分為引言。具體闡述選題背景和意義,國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于此現(xiàn)象的探究現(xiàn)狀。并介紹了本文采用的研究方法和提出的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn),為整篇文章寫(xiě)作奠定根基。第二部分為債權(quán)多重讓與下權(quán)利歸屬的基礎(chǔ)理論和一般問(wèn)題的概述�；讵M義的債權(quán)讓與定義、在經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和法學(xué)視角下對(duì)產(chǎn)生債權(quán)多重讓與的原因展開(kāi)剖析。在對(duì)比兩大法系關(guān)于債權(quán)讓與和多重讓與制度與立法發(fā)展進(jìn)程的基礎(chǔ)下,結(jié)合我國(guó)債權(quán)讓與制度發(fā)展進(jìn)程,對(duì)債權(quán)多重讓與下的權(quán)利歸屬展開(kāi)界定,從而為構(gòu)建我國(guó)債權(quán)多重讓與權(quán)利歸屬規(guī)則提供理論支持。第三部分主要為債權(quán)多重讓與下權(quán)利歸屬的比較法考察與借鑒。分析兩大法系主要代表國(guó)家以及國(guó)際公約關(guān)于此問(wèn)題的立法規(guī)定,總結(jié)出當(dāng)今世界或者地區(qū)對(duì)此問(wèn)題的解決主要采取三種規(guī)則或者制度。在分析與對(duì)比三大主流規(guī)則利弊的基礎(chǔ)上,歸納出適應(yīng)我國(guó)國(guó)情的處理債權(quán)多重讓與問(wèn)題的經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒。第四部分是對(duì)我國(guó)債權(quán)多重讓與下權(quán)利歸屬的現(xiàn)狀與存在問(wèn)題之闡述。在對(duì)我國(guó)債權(quán)多重讓與下權(quán)利歸屬的立法規(guī)定和學(xué)者的爭(zhēng)議進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)出我國(guó)立法與實(shí)踐中關(guān)于債權(quán)多重讓與主要存在著債權(quán)多重讓與下權(quán)利歸屬規(guī)則不明晰、受讓人權(quán)益保障水平低、債權(quán)移轉(zhuǎn)時(shí)間的規(guī)定缺乏確切性,債權(quán)讓與缺乏對(duì)抗債務(wù)人以外第三人的要件等現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題。為完善我國(guó)立法、構(gòu)建債權(quán)多重讓與權(quán)利歸屬規(guī)則,解決多重讓與下權(quán)利歸屬問(wèn)題指明方向。第五部分是重構(gòu)我國(guó)債權(quán)多重讓與下權(quán)利歸屬制度的建議。在結(jié)合國(guó)情、選擇適用“通知在先權(quán)利在先”規(guī)則處理債權(quán)多重讓與權(quán)利歸屬問(wèn)題的基礎(chǔ)上,提出建立并完善債權(quán)多重讓與權(quán)利歸屬制度的建議。完善當(dāng)前關(guān)于債權(quán)讓與及債權(quán)多重讓與的立法規(guī)定的同時(shí),設(shè)計(jì)配套的債權(quán)多重讓與的法律規(guī)制措施,降低債權(quán)多重讓與發(fā)生的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),并為該問(wèn)題的發(fā)生提供法律支持,使該問(wèn)題解決有法可依,從而促進(jìn)法治社會(huì)的構(gòu)建。
[Abstract]:The economist Macleod once said, "if we asked who is the most profound influence on the social wealth for people? In the thoughtful after we will sure answer - first discovered the creditor's right to the deal." modern trading is no longer limited to barter, the creditor's rights as a kind of intangible property, as a transaction object is increasingly causing concern. Along with the creditor property highlight the value of the creditor's rights, property and functions of attention, the safety of credit assignment have higher requirements. The multiple claims, as a threat to the security of creditor's rights assignment problem, obviously contrary to claims of transaction security requirements, in violation of the principles of civil law of honesty and trustworthiness, stable development impact the economic order and social order. This problem not only has entered people's daily life, but also caused widespread concern in academic circles. How to solve the debt disputes, clear multiple claims occurred When the balance between the rights of ownership, the transfer of creditor's rights in the interests of the parties, to maintain stable and orderly economic life is urgent. Therefore, in the background of the revised civil code, this paper tries to question the right belongs to the multiple claims under study, hope to attract lawmakers for multiple assignment problem. To perfect the civil law legislation the opportunity, to fill the gaps in our legislation on this issue, find in favor of the transfer of creditor's rights legislation, prompted claims function realization. This paper uses the legal hermeneutics, ownership of multiple claims under the method of comparative law research and practice are discussed. Based on the current situation and practice of China's legislation, pointed out that our country about the multiple claims of the legislation, in the comprehensive analysis on this issue abroad advanced legislative experience at the same time, how to improve China's multiple The legislation of the enlightenment and reference. In the premise of improving the transfer of creditor's rights and multiple claims legislation, put forward to establish our country's multiple claims ownership system or rules, and guide the healthy and orderly development of the transfer of creditor's rights. This article is divided into five parts of rights belonging to the multiple claims under detail: the first part is the introduction. Elaborated the background and significance, research status quo about this phenomenon at home and abroad. And introduces the research methods used in this paper and the innovation points, and laid the foundation for the whole article writing. The second part is an overview of the basic theory of ownership rights and the general problem of multiple assignment. The assignment of the narrow definition based on the perspective of economics and law on the causes of multiple assignments are explored. In contrast to the two law on the transfer of creditor's rights and make multiple The foundation and development process of the system and legislation, combined with the development process of the transfer of creditor's rights system in China, launched the definition of ownership rights under the multiple claims, so as to provide theoretical support for the construction of China's multiple claims ownership rules. The third part is the multiple claims under the comparative law of rights of investigation and reference analysis. On behalf of the two countries and the International Convention on the issue of legislation, summed up the solution to this problem in the world today or regions mainly adopt three kinds of rules or system. Based on the analysis and comparison of advantages and disadvantages of the three main flow rules, summed up the adaptation problem of processing multiple claims in our country experience fourth. This part is the present situation and the existence of rights of our country under the multiple assignment problem. In our country the multiple claims under the ownership of rights legislation The basis of the analysis of regulations and scholars dispute, summed up the legislation and practice in our country about the multiple claims there are multiple claims under the rules of the rights of ownership is not clear, the protection of the rights and interests of the low level, the lack of precise time transfer provisions of creditor's rights, creditor's rights assignment lack third against the other elements practical problems. To improve our legislation, constructing multiple claims ownership rules, to solve the problem of ownership rights under the multiple assignment direction. The fifth part is the proposal for the reconstruction of the rights of ownership of our country with the multiple claims. In combination with the national conditions, choose to apply the "notice first right" rules to deal with the multiple claims of ownership rights the problem, put forward to establish and perfect the multiple claims ownership system. To improve the current on the transfer of creditor's rights and multiple claims At the same time, we need to design the legal regulation measures of the multiple transfer of creditor's rights, reduce the risk of multiple assignment of creditor's rights, and provide legal support for the occurrence of the problem, so that we can solve this problem and provide a legal basis for it, so as to promote the construction of a rule of law society.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇兆勇;何惠瑩;;論債權(quán)讓與的生效[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年15期

2 張良;;完善我國(guó)債權(quán)讓與制度的思考[J];中州學(xué)刊;2006年05期

3 肖婉珍;;對(duì)債權(quán)讓與制度若干問(wèn)題的探討[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2007年04期

4 孫茜;;將來(lái)債權(quán)讓與可行性分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年23期

5 黃小育;;我國(guó)債權(quán)讓與制度的完善[J];行政與法;2009年12期

6 胡雨春;曹宇;;論債權(quán)讓與通知的效力——兼對(duì)債權(quán)讓與通知傳統(tǒng)理論的反思[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年18期

7 李艷斐;;債權(quán)讓與通知若干法律問(wèn)題之我見(jiàn)[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年26期

8 裴麗萍;論債權(quán)讓與的若干基本問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1995年06期

9 夏恒信,盧俊山,馮繼華;論債權(quán)讓與若干問(wèn)題[J];山東審判;1998年05期

10 汪傳才;論債權(quán)讓與的通知[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 李宇;;債權(quán)讓與和債權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的統(tǒng)一[A];2014年第五屆全國(guó)民商法學(xué)博士生學(xué)術(shù)論壇論文摘要集[C];2014年

2 申建平;;債權(quán)讓與制度之歷史演進(jìn)[A];全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)叢書(shū)——20世紀(jì)外國(guó)刑事法律的理論與實(shí)踐[C];2005年

3 李雯;;以轉(zhuǎn)讓方式轉(zhuǎn)移擬證券化債權(quán)資產(chǎn)的相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題探討[A];2008全國(guó)博士生學(xué)術(shù)論壇（國(guó)際法）論文集——國(guó)際公法、國(guó)際私法分冊(cè)[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前8條

1 姜春玲;債權(quán)讓與各方當(dāng)事人利益平衡之我見(jiàn)[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2006年

2 林勁標(biāo)邋凌蔚 游春亮;出庭也是債權(quán)讓與通知方式[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

3 中國(guó)政法大學(xué)民商經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)院 趙廉慧;債權(quán)讓與禁止之約定的效力[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

4 錢(qián)利芳;債權(quán)讓與了 受讓人應(yīng)該還債[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2006年

5 案例編寫(xiě)人 重慶市巫山縣人民法院 蔣家富;普通提貨單轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律屬性系債權(quán)讓與[N];人民法院報(bào);2010年

6 朱大倫;債權(quán)讓與應(yīng)當(dāng)由讓與人通知債務(wù)人[N];人民法院報(bào);2007年

7 馬串蓮;債務(wù)人能否自愿向債權(quán)受讓人清償債務(wù)[N];人民法院報(bào);2002年

8 記者 施浩;“定制”受讓人 春暉股份易主趨明朗[N];上海證券報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 申建平;債權(quán)讓與制度研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2006年

2 楊驥;論保理業(yè)務(wù)對(duì)傳統(tǒng)債權(quán)讓與理論的沖擊和變革[D];湖南大學(xué);2014年

3 楊春華;金錢(qián)債權(quán)有效實(shí)現(xiàn)保障論[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 朱浩杰;論債權(quán)讓與通知的效力[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

2 呂洪成;債權(quán)讓與制度研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2008年

3 吳鑫磊;債權(quán)讓與之法律結(jié)構(gòu)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

4 陳坤;論債權(quán)讓與制度中的通知[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

5 余崇順;債權(quán)讓與制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

6 曾海峰;債權(quán)讓與制度研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2011年

7 孫杰;“熟人社會(huì)”背景下債權(quán)讓與中的主張力減弱現(xiàn)象觀(guān)察[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

8 鄭遠(yuǎn)園;實(shí)務(wù)中的債權(quán)讓與制度[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

9 夏斌;債權(quán)讓與公示問(wèn)題研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2014年

10 丁潔心;債權(quán)雙重讓與之法效果研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1563453