本文關(guān)鍵詞： 合同 附隨義務(wù) 法律后果　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：合同附隨義務(wù)理論是在德國的學(xué)說與判例中逐步確立起來的,是誠實(shí)信用原則在合同法領(lǐng)域的重要體現(xiàn)。雖然我國《合同法》第60條第2款認(rèn)可了合同附隨義務(wù)的存在,但是《合同法》并沒有對合同附隨義務(wù)違反的法律后果作出明確規(guī)定。立法上沒有明確合同附隨義務(wù)違反的責(zé)任性質(zhì)、歸責(zé)原則、責(zé)任形式、是否能訴請履行、是否能解除合同,同時(shí)理論界對于合同附隨義務(wù)的內(nèi)涵范圍、具體類型等問題的研究存在爭議,這就導(dǎo)致司法實(shí)踐中在認(rèn)定合同附隨義務(wù)違反的法律后果時(shí)存在搖擺和困惑。本文結(jié)合我國法律法規(guī)的相關(guān)規(guī)定以及司法實(shí)踐中的典型案例,在認(rèn)定合同附隨義務(wù)的內(nèi)涵與類型的基礎(chǔ)上,對合同附隨義務(wù)違反的具體法律后果進(jìn)行探析。本文分為三個(gè)大章:第一章論述了合同附隨義務(wù)的認(rèn)定。首先論述了合同附隨義務(wù)的內(nèi)涵,分析了學(xué)說爭議和理論發(fā)展,得出合同附隨義務(wù)具有附隨性、不確定性與法定性的特征。其次分析了合同附隨義務(wù)與先合同義務(wù)、后合同義務(wù)的關(guān)系,闡釋了其與從給付義務(wù)的區(qū)別。最后論述了合同附隨義務(wù)的類型,分析了各國學(xué)者觀點(diǎn)與我國法律規(guī)定,列舉了合同附隨義務(wù)的主要類型。第二章探討了合同附隨義務(wù)違反的責(zé)任。首先論述了合同附隨義務(wù)違反的責(zé)任性質(zhì),總結(jié)了各國立法例與學(xué)說以及我國司法實(shí)踐的做法,提出了適用違約責(zé)任的理由。其次分析了合同附隨義務(wù)違反的歸責(zé)原則,闡述了我國相關(guān)法律規(guī)定與司法實(shí)踐的做法,明確了嚴(yán)格責(zé)任與過錯(cuò)責(zé)任的區(qū)分,解釋了過錯(cuò)推定責(zé)任的合理性。第三章論述了合同附隨義務(wù)違反的救濟(jì)。首先論述了強(qiáng)制履行能否適用的問題,區(qū)分了不可適用與可適用的具體情形,分析了適用強(qiáng)制履行的具體條件。其次探析了合同附隨義務(wù)違反時(shí)的損害賠償范圍,肯定了可預(yù)見性原則的適用,分析了履行利益與固有利益的賠償范圍,否定了非財(cái)產(chǎn)性賠償在違約責(zé)任中的適用。再次探討了合同附隨義務(wù)違反時(shí)債權(quán)人能否行使同時(shí)履行抗辯權(quán)的問題,分析了我國理論與實(shí)踐中的爭議焦點(diǎn),從理論與個(gè)案的角度論述了行使同時(shí)履行抗辯權(quán)的可能性。最后討論了合同附隨義務(wù)違反能否導(dǎo)致合同解除的問題,總結(jié)了我國司法實(shí)踐的做法以及國內(nèi)外的理論爭議,從合同解除權(quán)行使條件角度論述了合同附隨義務(wù)違反時(shí)債權(quán)人行使法定解除權(quán)的可能性,并闡述了行使合同解除權(quán)的具體條件。
[Abstract]:The theory of contract collateral obligation is gradually established in German doctrine and case law, which is an important embodiment of the principle of good faith in the field of contract law, although the existence of contract collateral obligation is recognized in Article 60 (2) of contract Law of China. However, the contract Law does not clearly specify the legal consequences of breach of the contractual collateral obligation. Legislation does not specify the nature of the breach of the contractual collateral obligation, the principle of imputation, the form of liability, and whether or not it can be appealed for performance. Whether the contract can be rescinded or not, at the same time, there is a dispute in the theoretical circle on the scope of connotation and the specific types of contract collateral obligations. This will lead to wobble and confusion in judicial practice in the determination of the legal consequences of breach of contractual collateral obligations. This paper combines the relevant provisions of laws and regulations of our country and typical cases in judicial practice. On the basis of the determination of the connotation and types of contractual collateral obligations, This article is divided into three chapters: the first chapter discusses the determination of contract collateral obligation. First, it discusses the connotation of contract collateral obligation, analyzes the theoretical controversy and theoretical development. It is concluded that the contract collateral obligation has the characteristics of appendage, uncertainty and legality. Secondly, the relationship between the contract collateral obligation and the prior contract obligation, then the contractual obligation is analyzed. This paper explains the difference between the contract collateral obligation and the subordinate obligation. Finally, it discusses the types of the contract collateral obligation, and analyzes the viewpoints of the scholars in various countries and the legal provisions of our country. This paper enumerates the main types of contractual collateral obligations. Chapter two discusses the liability of breach of contractual collateral obligations. Firstly, it discusses the nature of the breach of contractual collateral obligations, summarizes the legislative examples and doctrines of various countries and the judicial practice of our country. This paper puts forward the reasons for applying the liability for breach of contract. Secondly, it analyzes the principle of imputation of breach of contract collateral obligation, expounds the relevant legal provisions and judicial practice of our country, and clarifies the distinction between strict liability and fault liability. It explains the rationality of the presumption of fault liability. The third chapter discusses the relief of the breach of the contract collateral obligation. Firstly, it discusses whether the compulsory performance can be applied, and distinguishes between the inapplicable and the applicable circumstances. This paper analyzes the specific conditions for applying compulsory performance. Secondly, it analyzes the scope of damages when the contract collateral obligation is violated, affirms the application of the principle of predictability, and analyzes the scope of compensation of performance interest and inherent interest. This paper negates the application of non-property compensation in breach of contract, discusses again the question of whether the creditor can exercise the right of defense at the same time when the contract collateral obligation is violated, and analyzes the dispute focus in the theory and practice of our country. This paper discusses the possibility of exercising the right of defense at the same time from the angle of theory and case, and finally discusses whether the breach of collateral obligation of contract can lead to the termination of contract, summarizes the practice of judicial practice in our country and theoretical disputes at home and abroad. From the point of view of the conditions for the exercise of the right to rescind the contract, this paper discusses the possibility of the creditor exercising the statutory right of dissolution when the collateral obligation of the contract is violated, and expounds the specific conditions for the exercise of the right of rescission of the contract
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 崔文星;;對附隨義務(wù)的界定[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期

2 肖霄;;論我國附隨義務(wù)制度的不足及完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年05期

3 丁琳;;論附隨義務(wù)[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

4 鄭文科;;論旅游合同中游客的附隨義務(wù)[J];中國商貿(mào);2012年23期

5 陶茶香;;淺析銀行卡存款當(dāng)事人的附隨義務(wù)[J];金融與經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年05期

6 孟玉英;;淺談附隨義務(wù)和根本違約[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年08期

7 龍啟祥;;析合同附隨義務(wù)[J];法學(xué)天地;2000年10期

8 王宏;論合同法上的附隨義務(wù)[J];山東師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年03期

9 吳杏華;試析合同履行中的附隨義務(wù)[J];江蘇公安專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2000年06期

10 張鋒會(huì),魯崢;試論《合同法》中的附隨義務(wù)[J];濮陽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 龍暉;;淺論合同附隨義務(wù)[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（2008年第3輯）[C];2008年

2 孫衛(wèi)星;;淺議合同履行中的附隨義務(wù)[A];中國民商法實(shí)務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2004年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 路驪珠;附隨義務(wù)的法律地位[N];法制日報(bào);2005年

2 武春華;合同簽訂后除履行合同外還要注意附隨義務(wù)[N];中國建設(shè)報(bào);2006年

3 倪禮祥;淺議保密附隨義務(wù)[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2005年

4 周瑜珍 周志峰;民法理論中的附隨義務(wù)及其局限性[N];人民法院報(bào);2001年

5 王永亮;戶口遷移非賣房人附隨義務(wù)[N];人民法院報(bào);2005年

6 史朝霞;附隨義務(wù)歸責(zé)原則之我見[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2008年

7 浙江省旅游質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理所 黃恢月;旅行社未履行附隨義務(wù)糾紛及其處理[N];中國旅游報(bào);2011年

8 高晉康 杜軍;星級賓館對顧客車輛應(yīng)承擔(dān)附隨義務(wù)[N];檢察日報(bào);2003年

9 樊逸峰;正確理解合同附隨義務(wù)[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2008年

10 張加量;合同法上附隨義務(wù)之責(zé)任探析[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2011年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王華秀;銀行個(gè)人理財(cái)合同附隨義務(wù)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

2 侯國躍;契約附隨義務(wù)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 夏朝霞;合同附隨義務(wù)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

2 孟艷超;論我國附隨義務(wù)制度的構(gòu)建[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

3 敖境;論國際貨物買賣合同中的附隨義務(wù)[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

4 朱華群;論合同法上的附隨義務(wù)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

5 林嘉琦;銀行附隨義務(wù)研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

6 顧丹丹;附隨義務(wù)制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

7 張琪;論附隨義務(wù)理論在我國司法中的適用[D];中國政法大學(xué);2014年

8 李靜雯;論《合同法》上的附隨義務(wù)[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2015年

9 陳文婧;論合同附隨義務(wù)[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

10 高雅靜;論合同附隨義務(wù)違反的法律后果[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號：1551255