【摘要】：集體協(xié)商制度是目前世界上大多數(shù)國(guó)家都普遍采用的協(xié)調(diào)勞動(dòng)者與用人單位關(guān)系的重要法律制度。在國(guó)外，集體協(xié)商制度已成為保護(hù)勞動(dòng)者合法權(quán)益以及穩(wěn)定社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序最重要的制度之一。我國(guó)同樣也有集體合同制度，《勞動(dòng)法》、《工會(huì)法》和其他法律法規(guī)都對(duì)工會(huì)的設(shè)立，以及其作為勞動(dòng)者代表參加集體協(xié)商和簽訂集體合同的主體資格以及維護(hù)勞動(dòng)者的合法利益方面有明確的規(guī)定。但由于種種原因，我國(guó)的現(xiàn)行工會(huì)制度存在許多問(wèn)題，導(dǎo)致了其與集體協(xié)商的發(fā)展不相適應(yīng)，集體協(xié)商過(guò)程流于形式，集體合同普遍內(nèi)容空洞的弊病，工會(huì)與集體協(xié)商制度都未能發(fā)揮它們應(yīng)有的作用。希望通過(guò)本文的研究，可以找出構(gòu)建與我國(guó)集體協(xié)商發(fā)展相適應(yīng)的工會(huì)制度的方法，使集體合同制度可以真正和充分的發(fā)揮其積極作用。 本文正文分為五個(gè)章節(jié)： 第一章對(duì)國(guó)家關(guān)于集體協(xié)商制度的主要立法沿革進(jìn)行分階段介紹，為下面的論述作鋪墊。 第二章對(duì)我國(guó)工會(huì)在集體協(xié)商發(fā)展過(guò)程中與其不相適應(yīng)的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析，重點(diǎn)分析了2001年《工會(huì)法》修訂后的現(xiàn)有的工會(huì)制度在集體協(xié)商中存在的主要問(wèn)題。本章的主要目的是為了明確解決當(dāng)前我國(guó)工會(huì)制度與集體協(xié)商發(fā)展不適應(yīng)問(wèn)題的必要性，強(qiáng)調(diào)了本文研究的意義。 第三章以國(guó)外工會(huì)和集體談判規(guī)范作為研究對(duì)象，主要對(duì)美國(guó)、韓國(guó)、日本等發(fā)達(dá)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家調(diào)整集體合同制度和工會(huì)制度的立法進(jìn)行分析，并對(duì)我國(guó)構(gòu)建與集體協(xié)商發(fā)展相適應(yīng)的工會(huì)制度可以借鑒的經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要的評(píng)析和歸納。 第四章是關(guān)于構(gòu)建適應(yīng)我國(guó)集體協(xié)商發(fā)展的工會(huì)制度的法理思考。構(gòu)建適應(yīng)我國(guó)集體協(xié)商發(fā)展的工會(huì)制度更符合保護(hù)勞動(dòng)者的合法權(quán)益這個(gè)設(shè)立集體協(xié)商制度的最主要目的。此外，構(gòu)建適應(yīng)我國(guó)集體協(xié)商發(fā)展的工會(huì)制度也是構(gòu)建新型勞資關(guān)系、實(shí)現(xiàn)勞資自治并最終促進(jìn)勞動(dòng)者與用人單位實(shí)現(xiàn)雙贏的重要措施，再次強(qiáng)調(diào)了本文的研究意義。 第五章是對(duì)構(gòu)建適應(yīng)我國(guó)集體協(xié)商發(fā)展的工會(huì)制度提出的立法建議。在本文前面深入研究的基礎(chǔ)上，根據(jù)集體協(xié)商制度的價(jià)值取向，，立足國(guó)內(nèi)現(xiàn)有法律并借鑒國(guó)外的先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)，提出了在立法中明確用人單位與工會(huì)進(jìn)行集體協(xié)商的法定義務(wù)、提高工會(huì)對(duì)勞動(dòng)者利益的代表性、從經(jīng)費(fèi)和人事上真正實(shí)現(xiàn)工會(huì)的獨(dú)立性、健全工會(huì)集體協(xié)商的程序保障機(jī)制以及強(qiáng)化工會(huì)作為勞動(dòng)者與用人單位的橋梁作用，并充分發(fā)揮其在集體協(xié)商中的主導(dǎo)作用等建議。
[Abstract]:Collective bargaining system is an important legal system which is widely used in most countries in the world to coordinate the relationship between workers and employers. In foreign countries, collective bargaining system has become one of the most important systems to protect the legitimate rights and interests of workers and to stabilize the social and economic order. China also has a collective contract system. The Labor Law, the Trade Union Law, and other laws and regulations establish trade unions. There are clear regulations on the subject qualification of participating in collective negotiation and signing collective contract and safeguarding the legitimate interests of workers. However, due to various reasons, there are many problems in the current trade union system of our country, which lead to its malaise of not adapting to the development of collective negotiation, the process of collective negotiation is just a formality, and the general content of collective contract is empty. Trade unions and collective bargaining failed to play their proper role. It is hoped that through the study of this paper, we can find out the method of constructing the trade union system which is suitable for the development of collective negotiation in our country, so that the collective contract system can really and fully play its positive role. The text of this paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter introduces the main legislative evolution of the national collective bargaining system in stages, paving the way for the following discussion. The second chapter analyzes the problems that the trade unions in our country do not adapt to in the development of collective negotiation, focusing on the main problems existing in the existing trade union system after the revision of the Trade Union Law in 2001. The main purpose of this chapter is to clearly solve the current trade union system and the development of collective consultation of the necessity of the development of this paper stressed the significance of the study. The third chapter takes the foreign trade union and collective bargaining norm as the research object, mainly analyzes the legislation of adjusting the collective contract system and the trade union system in the developed market economy countries such as the United States, South Korea, Japan, etc. The paper also makes a brief analysis and summary of the experiences that can be used for reference in the construction of trade union system suitable for the development of collective negotiation in China. The fourth chapter is about the construction of China's collective bargaining development of trade union system of legal thinking. The construction of a trade union system adapted to the development of collective bargaining in China is more in line with the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of workers, which is the main purpose of establishing the collective bargaining system. In addition, it is also an important measure to construct a new type of labor relations, to realize the autonomy of labor and to promote the win-win situation between workers and employers, which emphasizes the significance of this paper again. The fifth chapter is the legislative suggestion to construct the trade union system which adapts to the development of collective negotiation. On the basis of the previous in-depth study, according to the value orientation of collective consultation system, based on the existing domestic laws and foreign advanced legislative experience, this paper puts forward the legal obligation of collective negotiation between employers and trade unions in legislation. To improve the representation of labor unions to the interests of workers, to truly realize the independence of trade unions in terms of funds and personnel, to improve the procedural guarantee mechanism for collective negotiation of trade unions, and to strengthen the role of trade unions as a bridge between workers and employers. And give full play to its leading role in collective negotiations and other suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳文芳;;德國(guó)集體合同“法規(guī)性效力”與“債權(quán)性效力”之研究[J];法商研究;2010年02期

2 趙紅梅;;從“富士康事件”看我國(guó)勞動(dòng)者權(quán)益保護(hù)機(jī)制的缺陷[J];法學(xué);2010年08期

3 馮祥武;;珠三角地區(qū)工資集體協(xié)商的現(xiàn)狀和相關(guān)理論問(wèn)題[J];法治研究;2012年02期

4 程延園;;集體談判在我國(guó)的發(fā)展與完善[J];工會(huì)博覽;2006年03期

5 王賢森;西方國(guó)家工會(huì)集體談判經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究——兼論對(duì)我國(guó)工會(huì)的啟示[J];工會(huì)理論與實(shí)踐.中國(guó)工運(yùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

6 姜穎;對(duì)集體合同形式化的反思[J];工會(huì)理論與實(shí)踐.中國(guó)工運(yùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

7 趙曉華;;工資集體協(xié)商與和諧勞動(dòng)關(guān)系構(gòu)建——工會(huì)在工資集體協(xié)商中的角色定位[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

8 陶建國(guó);;德國(guó)集體合同制度及其糾紛解決機(jī)制[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

9 黃任民;;中國(guó)工資集體協(xié)商的特點(diǎn)及工會(huì)的作用[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

10 李立新;;從日本勞動(dòng)立法看我國(guó)集體談判權(quán)的保障[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 王鵲林;南非集體談判制度研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2010年

2 陸慧;集體談判制度中的主體問(wèn)題研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2006年

3 李鳳春;論中國(guó)工會(huì)的地位與作用[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

4 孫巍寧;當(dāng)代中國(guó)工會(huì)維權(quán)職能缺失的原因及對(duì)策研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

5 曾婧;論我國(guó)工會(huì)在維權(quán)中的角色沖突[D];西南交通大學(xué);2010年

6 羅曉季;集體談判權(quán)的憲法保護(hù)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2123255