本文關(guān)鍵詞： 收入公平 消費(fèi)公平 擴(kuò)大內(nèi)需 制度創(chuàng)新 消費(fèi)貢獻(xiàn)制度　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 本文在傳統(tǒng)“收入公平——經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)”分析框架的基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建了“收入公平——消費(fèi)公平——經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)”的理論模型。在對(duì)該模型分析的基礎(chǔ)上,本文認(rèn)為公平與效率是可以兼得的,其交叉影響因素就是消費(fèi)公平�；诖�,筆者提出了消費(fèi)公平政策的概念,解釋并發(fā)展了庫(kù)茲涅茨假說(shuō)。 消費(fèi)是生產(chǎn)的唯一目的,擴(kuò)大內(nèi)需是我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展長(zhǎng)期基本立足點(diǎn)。本文認(rèn)為擴(kuò)大內(nèi)需的首要任務(wù)是擴(kuò)大居民消費(fèi),通過(guò)實(shí)證分析發(fā)現(xiàn),由于邊際消費(fèi)傾向遞減,我國(guó)存在居民消費(fèi)不公平現(xiàn)象,主要表現(xiàn)為低收入者消費(fèi)占收入比例過(guò)高,而高收入者消費(fèi)不足,并且,我國(guó)消費(fèi)不公平擴(kuò)大的程度遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)大于收入不公平擴(kuò)大的程度,帶動(dòng)了收入不公平程度繼續(xù)擴(kuò)大,影響了經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康增長(zhǎng)。因此,擴(kuò)大內(nèi)需的重點(diǎn)是擴(kuò)大高收入者消費(fèi)。 為更有效地?cái)U(kuò)大內(nèi)需,本文分析了制約我國(guó)居民消費(fèi)的瓶頸因素,并相應(yīng)評(píng)析了常用擴(kuò)大內(nèi)需措施,發(fā)現(xiàn)目前實(shí)施的很多措施不利于長(zhǎng)期經(jīng)濟(jì)健康發(fā)展。因此,我國(guó)應(yīng)改變擴(kuò)大內(nèi)需的方式,以更寬闊的眼光尋求擴(kuò)大內(nèi)需的有效措施,確保國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)又好又快發(fā)展。 社會(huì)公正是和諧社會(huì)的本質(zhì)和基石。由于種種原因,我國(guó)目前在社會(huì)公正方面存在的問(wèn)題已經(jīng)成為建設(shè)和諧社會(huì)和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的最大瓶頸。為此,本文認(rèn)為,尋求可持續(xù)發(fā)展機(jī)制,我國(guó)需要進(jìn)行制度創(chuàng)新,并且,制度創(chuàng)新應(yīng)更有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)公平正義、有利于擴(kuò)大居民消費(fèi)、有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)消費(fèi)的公平、有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)居民對(duì)社會(huì)責(zé)任公平。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文提出了消費(fèi)貢獻(xiàn)制度的概念,以社會(huì)公平為出發(fā)點(diǎn),倡導(dǎo)通過(guò)消費(fèi)公平及對(duì)社會(huì)責(zé)任公平方式擴(kuò)大內(nèi)需,促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),逐步轉(zhuǎn)變政府職能,縮小收入差距,規(guī)范市場(chǎng)秩序及完善社會(huì)保障制度。此外,本文還論證了修改勞動(dòng)法的必要性。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the traditional analysis frame of "income equity-economic growth", this paper constructs a theoretical model of "income equity-consumption equity-economic growth", which is based on the analysis of this model. This paper holds that both fairness and efficiency can be obtained, and the cross-influencing factor is consumption fairness. Based on this, the author puts forward the concept of consumer justice policy and explains and develops the Kuznets hypothesis. Consumption is the only purpose of production, and expanding domestic demand is the long-term basic foothold of economic development in China. This paper thinks that the first task of expanding domestic demand is to expand the consumption of residents, and find out through empirical analysis. Because of the decline of marginal consumption tendency, there is an unfair phenomenon of resident consumption in our country, which mainly shows that the proportion of low income consumption to income is too high, while the high income consumption is insufficient, and. The extent of unfair expansion of consumption in China is far greater than that of income inequality, which leads to the continued expansion of income inequality and affects the healthy growth of the economy. The focus of expanding domestic demand is to expand the consumption of high income earners. In order to expand domestic demand more effectively, this paper analyzes the bottleneck factors that restrict the consumption of our country's residents, and evaluates the common measures to expand domestic demand accordingly. It is found that the current implementation of many measures is not conducive to the healthy development of the long-term economy. Therefore, China should change the way of expanding domestic demand and seek more effective measures to expand domestic demand in a broader perspective. To ensure the sound and rapid development of the national economy. Social justice is the essence and cornerstone of a harmonious society. For various reasons, the problems existing in social justice in China have become the biggest bottleneck in the construction of harmonious society and economic development. In order to seek the sustainable development mechanism, our country needs to carry on the system innovation, moreover, the system innovation should be more advantageous to realize the social fair justice, is advantageous to enlarge the resident consumption, is advantageous to realize the consumption fairness. On this basis, this paper puts forward the concept of consumption contribution system, taking social equity as the starting point, advocating the expansion of domestic demand through consumption equity and social responsibility equity. Promote economic growth, gradually change government functions, narrow income gap, standardize market order and perfect social security system. In addition, this paper also demonstrates the necessity of amending labor law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F124;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬海濤,姜愛(ài)華;個(gè)人收入分配差距拉大的原因分析及對(duì)策[J];財(cái)政研究;2003年07期

2 袁曉玲;楊萬(wàn)平;;政府、居民消費(fèi)與中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的因果關(guān)系[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2008年05期

3 徐麗敏;;國(guó)外福利依賴(lài)研究綜述[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年06期

4 張理智;;論“公平與效率之爭(zhēng)”無(wú)意義[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

5 路征;;經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與收入分配互動(dòng)機(jī)制研究綜述[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2008年10期

6 吳信如;;我國(guó)最終消費(fèi)與收入增長(zhǎng)的互動(dòng)關(guān)系:一個(gè)3SLS估計(jì)[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期

7 馬強(qiáng);我國(guó)居民消費(fèi)需求不足的成因與對(duì)策[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2004年05期

8 王慶華;;我國(guó)收入分配差距的癥結(jié)與政策建議[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2008年12期

9 王玉梅;;如何建立我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2006年13期

10 劉桂芝,劉振華;經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與收入分配相關(guān)性研究重點(diǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移帶來(lái)的政策啟示[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)緯;2004年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1464619