【摘要】：保險(xiǎn)公司破產(chǎn)前置程序主要表現(xiàn)為通過有力的行政干預(yù)對(duì)問題保險(xiǎn)公司進(jìn)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)處置,避免破產(chǎn)司法程序的啟動(dòng),以降低保險(xiǎn)公司破產(chǎn)事件對(duì)整個(gè)金融秩序和經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的高度負(fù)外部性。我國(guó)現(xiàn)有立法原則規(guī)定了保險(xiǎn)公司破產(chǎn)前置程序的相關(guān)問題,實(shí)踐中也發(fā)生了一些啟動(dòng)前置程序進(jìn)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)處置的案例,但顯然還存在行政權(quán)力一支獨(dú)大、保險(xiǎn)保障基金使用不規(guī)范、前置程序難以向司法程序順利過渡等諸多問題。借鑒美國(guó)、日本保險(xiǎn)業(yè)以及我國(guó)其他金融行業(yè)的有益經(jīng)驗(yàn),我國(guó)應(yīng)通過增加程序性要求、合理限制保險(xiǎn)保障基金的用途以及細(xì)化前置程序與司法程序的銜接要求等方式不斷完善提高保險(xiǎn)公司破產(chǎn)前置程序的立法和執(zhí)法實(shí)踐。
[Abstract]:The pre-bankruptcy procedure of the insurance company mainly shows that it can deal with the risk of the problem insurance company through the powerful administrative intervention to avoid the commencement of the bankruptcy judicial proceedings. In order to reduce the bankruptcy of insurance companies to the overall financial order and economic and social highly negative externalities. The existing legislative principles of our country stipulate the related problems of the pre-bankruptcy procedure for insurance companies. In practice, there have also been some cases of initiating the pre-procedure for risk disposal, but obviously there is still a monopoly of administrative power. The use of insurance guarantee fund is not standardized, and it is difficult to make a smooth transition to judicial procedure. Drawing lessons from the useful experience of the United States, Japan's insurance industry and other financial industries in China, China should increase its procedural requirements by adding procedural requirements. In order to improve the legislation and enforcement practice of insurance company's bankruptcy pre-procedure, it is necessary to restrict the use of insurance guarantee fund reasonably and to refine the connection requirements between pre-procedure and judicial procedure.
【作者單位】： 對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“國(guó)際評(píng)級(jí)巨頭霸權(quán)濫用及我國(guó)的法律應(yīng)對(duì)措施”(項(xiàng)目批準(zhǔn)號(hào):13BFX147)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D922.284;D922.291.92

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張娜;;證券虛假陳述民事訴訟的前置程序研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年09期

2 朱文龍;盧鼎亮;羊文;;股東派生訴訟前置程序探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年29期

3 王春;;股東派生訴訟前置程序研究[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年05期

4 楊曼;建立股東派生訴訟制度[J];社科縱橫;2004年03期

5 李曉政;陳明湖;;公司解散訴訟的程序困境及路徑選擇[J];中國(guó)集體經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年25期

6 王雪W，

本文編號(hào)：2438014