【摘要】：《中共中央關(guān)于全面深化改革若干重大問題的決定》提出,科學(xué)的宏觀調(diào)控,有效的政府治理是發(fā)揮社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的內(nèi)在要求。完善調(diào)控體系關(guān)乎市場(chǎng)良性發(fā)展和政府管理效率,有序的調(diào)控秩序是我國(guó)宏觀調(diào)控的應(yīng)有之義,它能在很大程度上為提高調(diào)控質(zhì)量提供幫助。同時(shí),健全宏觀調(diào)控體系的一個(gè)重要方面就是以制度特別是法律制度保障調(diào)控活動(dòng)有效有序的進(jìn)行,在現(xiàn)階段的調(diào)控活動(dòng)中還時(shí)常出現(xiàn)決策、執(zhí)行過程中缺乏法律保障,法律制度滯后的現(xiàn)象,因此對(duì)宏觀調(diào)控體系建設(shè)應(yīng)該以法治化的視角加以審視。在學(xué)界的研究中,對(duì)于宏觀調(diào)控法治化的研究也多集中于對(duì)調(diào)控主體權(quán)力、職能的法律規(guī)制研究,并且在這些問題的研究上也都取得了很大成果,而對(duì)于調(diào)控過程、程序,理論界的目光卻鮮有青睞。但是實(shí)體制度與程序制度是相互作用的,調(diào)控活動(dòng)本身也是表現(xiàn)為動(dòng)態(tài)過程的,只關(guān)注主體或受體的權(quán)力(權(quán)利)、職責(zé)(義務(wù))容易使研究的思路局限在人的行為本身而忽略了行為行使的時(shí)間、空間、方式是否符合法律的要求。強(qiáng)調(diào)調(diào)控程序的制度化,是因?yàn)檎{(diào)控程序的好壞會(huì)直接影響到調(diào)控的秩序、效果以及目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn),如果缺乏法律機(jī)制的約束很可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致調(diào)控者的越權(quán)、濫權(quán)現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn),直接影響調(diào)控目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn),可見,想要實(shí)現(xiàn)高水平、高質(zhì)量的調(diào)控,調(diào)控實(shí)體規(guī)制與調(diào)控程序規(guī)制是不可偏廢。除此之外,法律程序本身的價(jià)值追求也要求政府的調(diào)控活動(dòng)體現(xiàn)程序上的正當(dāng)性,實(shí)現(xiàn)程序理性對(duì)調(diào)控秩序的維護(hù)�；谠搯栴}在理論層面和實(shí)踐層面的重要價(jià)值,有必要對(duì)這一問題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)分析。本文從這一視角出發(fā),在查閱相關(guān)資料、厘清相應(yīng)概念的基礎(chǔ)上,分析了調(diào)控程序法律規(guī)制的必要性和國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)理論與制度實(shí)踐,并針對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的調(diào)控過程中的制度缺失與不足提出自己的構(gòu)想與看法,希望通過對(duì)這一問題進(jìn)行研究能使自己加深對(duì)這一問題的理解,也期盼調(diào)控實(shí)踐過程中更多的目光集中于這一問題,早日實(shí)現(xiàn)宏觀調(diào)控法治化。
[Abstract]:The decision of the CPC Central Committee on comprehensively deepening reform puts forward that scientific macro-control and effective government governance are the inherent requirements for giving full play to the socialist market economic system. Perfecting the control system is related to the benign development of the market and the efficiency of the government management. The orderly control order is the proper meaning of the macro-control in our country, and it can help to improve the quality of the regulation and control to a great extent. At the same time, an important aspect of improving the macro-control system is the effective and orderly conduct of the regulation and control activities under the system, especially the legal system. At the present stage, decisions are often made in the regulatory activities, and there is a lack of legal protection in the process of implementation. Therefore, the construction of macro-control system should be examined from the perspective of rule of law. In the research of academic circles, the research on the rule of law of macro-control is mainly focused on the legal regulation of the power and function of the subject of regulation and control, and great achievements have been made in the study of these issues, and for the process of regulation and control, the procedure, The eyes of the theorists are seldom favored. However, the substantive system and the procedural system are interacted, and the regulatory activities themselves are dynamic processes, focusing only on the rights (rights) of the subject or the receptor. Duties (duties) tend to limit the research ideas to the human behavior itself and ignore the time, space and mode of the behavior to meet the requirements of the law. It is emphasized that the institutionalization of the regulatory procedures is because the good or bad of the regulatory procedures will directly affect the order, effect and realization of the objectives of the regulation and control. If there is no restriction of the legal mechanism, it is likely that the lack of legal mechanism will lead to the ultra vires of the regulator and the appearance of abuse of power. It can be seen that in order to achieve high level and high quality regulation, regulation entity regulation and regulation procedure regulation can not be neglected. In addition, the pursuit of the value of the legal procedure itself also requires the government to embody the legitimacy of the procedure and to realize the maintenance of the order of the control by the rationality of the procedure. Based on the important value of this problem in theory and practice, it is necessary to analyze this problem systematically. From this angle of view, on the basis of consulting relevant data and clarifying the corresponding concepts, this paper analyzes the necessity of legal regulation of regulatory procedures and the relevant theories and institutional practices at home and abroad. Aiming at the deficiency and deficiency of the system in the process of regulation and control in reality, the author puts forward his own ideas and opinions, hoping that through the study of this problem, he can deepen his understanding of the problem. We also hope to focus more attention on this issue in the process of regulation and control and realize the rule of law of macro-control as soon as possible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張守文;宏觀調(diào)控權(quán)的法律解析[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

2 邢會(huì)強(qiáng);宏觀調(diào)控行為的不可訴性探析[J];法商研究;2002年05期

3 李曙光;;對(duì)制定中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)政策法的幾點(diǎn)不同看法[J];法學(xué);2010年09期

4 王晨光;法律的可訴性:現(xiàn)代法治國(guó)家中法律的特征之一[J];法學(xué);1998年08期

5 顏運(yùn)秋,王力;對(duì)宏觀調(diào)控程序法治化的思考[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

6 馮果;;憲法秩序下的經(jīng)濟(jì)法法權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)探究[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年04期

7 覃忠;;試論我國(guó)宏觀調(diào)控的法治化[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

8 顏運(yùn)秋;李明耀;;宏觀調(diào)控通往法治之路的理論探索[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2012年06期

9 周人杰;劉瑞;;中外宏觀調(diào)控相關(guān)法律制度比較研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2008年06期

10 秦小紅,陳行龍;經(jīng)濟(jì)法對(duì)宏觀調(diào)控的法律規(guī)制[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐瀾波;宏觀調(diào)控法治化問題研究[D];中南大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2411415