發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-02 05:51

【摘要】：價(jià)格壟斷行為破壞市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制，損害消費(fèi)者和社會(huì)公共利益。依法開(kāi)展反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法工作，對(duì)預(yù)防和制止價(jià)格壟斷行為，保護(hù)公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)發(fā)揮重要作用，是完善社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的內(nèi)在需要。本文圍繞當(dāng)前我國(guó)反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法經(jīng)驗(yàn)尚處于起步階段，反價(jià)格壟斷工作面臨諸多挑戰(zhàn)，從如何借鑒歐盟執(zhí)法經(jīng)驗(yàn)、分析我國(guó)反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法難點(diǎn)，探索可行對(duì)策等方面，提高反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法能力和水平。本文結(jié)構(gòu)如下： 緒論部分通過(guò)研究背景、研究意義，闡述論文選題的出發(fā)點(diǎn)，在國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀、論文結(jié)構(gòu)、研究方法與思路等章節(jié)，對(duì)論文的寫(xiě)作思路做了整理和規(guī)范。 論文主體通過(guò)分析我國(guó)反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法存在的問(wèn)題、存在問(wèn)題的原因以及借鑒歐盟反價(jià)格壟斷法律制度和執(zhí)法對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示，提出完善我國(guó)反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法的對(duì)策。此部分共分為四章。具體內(nèi)容如下： 一、我國(guó)反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法存在的問(wèn)題。分析反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法存在的問(wèn)題是研究基礎(chǔ)。主要從市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管經(jīng)驗(yàn)不足、缺乏系統(tǒng)完整的反價(jià)格壟斷體系、對(duì)行政壟斷規(guī)制存在局限、反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法力量薄弱展開(kāi)。 二、我國(guó)反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法存在問(wèn)題的原因。主要是觀(guān)念上對(duì)反價(jià)格壟斷的重要性認(rèn)識(shí)不足、體制上反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法部門(mén)獨(dú)立性不夠、法律上反價(jià)格壟斷法律法規(guī)體系不健全、利益驅(qū)動(dòng)上導(dǎo)致經(jīng)營(yíng)者會(huì)以更隱蔽的方式形成價(jià)格壟斷。 三、歐盟反壟斷法律制度和執(zhí)法對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示。從總結(jié)歐盟反壟斷的立法基礎(chǔ)、法律框架、制度框架入手。 四、完善我國(guó)反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法的對(duì)策。主要包括以下幾個(gè)方面：完善配套立法，提供制度保障；進(jìn)行體制改革，保證執(zhí)法獨(dú)立性；建立長(zhǎng)效機(jī)制，規(guī)范價(jià)格行為；加強(qiáng)隊(duì)伍建設(shè)，提升執(zhí)法自信。 最后結(jié)論中指出，一方面反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法應(yīng)借鑒國(guó)外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)，，一方面反價(jià)格壟斷執(zhí)法應(yīng)立足中國(guó)國(guó)情進(jìn)行不斷完善。
[Abstract]:Price monopoly undermines the market competition mechanism and damages consumers and public interests. To carry out the law enforcement of anti-price monopoly according to law plays an important role in preventing and stopping price monopoly and protecting fair competition, which is the inherent need of perfecting the socialist market economic system. This article revolves around our country's anti-price monopoly law enforcement experience is still in the initial stage, the anti-price monopoly work faces many challenges, from how to draw lessons from the European Union's law enforcement experience, analyzes our country's anti-price monopoly law enforcement difficulty, explores the feasible countermeasure and so on. Improve the ability and level of law enforcement against price monopoly. The structure of this paper is as follows: introduction part through the research background, research significance, the starting point of the paper topics, research status at home and abroad, the structure of the paper, research methods and ideas and other chapters, The paper's writing ideas are sorted out and standardized. The main body of this paper puts forward the countermeasures to perfect the law enforcement of anti-price monopoly by analyzing the existing problems and the causes of the problems and drawing lessons from the European Union's anti-price monopoly law system and the enlightenment of the law enforcement to our country. This part is divided into four chapters. The specific contents are as follows: first, the problems existing in the enforcement of anti-price monopoly in China. It is the research foundation to analyze the problems existing in the law enforcement of anti-price monopoly. Mainly from the lack of market supervision experience, the lack of a systematic and complete anti-price monopoly system, there are limitations to the administrative monopoly regulation, anti-price monopoly law enforcement force is weak to carry out. Second, the reason that our country anti-price monopoly law enforcement exists problem. It is mainly due to the lack of understanding of the importance of anti-price monopoly, the lack of independence of anti-price monopoly law enforcement departments and the imperfect legal system of anti-price monopoly laws and regulations. Interest-driven causes the operator to form a price monopoly in a more subtle way. Third, EU anti-monopoly legal system and law enforcement to our country enlightenment. From the summary of the EU anti-monopoly legislative basis, legal framework, institutional framework. Fourth, perfect our country anti-price monopoly law enforcement countermeasure. It mainly includes the following aspects: perfect supporting legislation, provide system guarantee; carry out system reform to ensure the independence of law enforcement; establish long-term mechanism, standardize price behavior; strengthen the construction of the team, enhance the confidence of law enforcement. Finally, it is pointed out that, on the one hand, anti-price monopoly law enforcement should draw lessons from foreign advanced experience, and on the other hand, anti-price monopoly law enforcement should be continuously improved on the basis of China's national conditions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 于立;姜春海;;自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)的規(guī)制政策研究[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

2 于良春;張偉;;中國(guó)行業(yè)性行政壟斷的強(qiáng)度與效率損失研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年03期

3 李鐳;;第二講:我國(guó)反價(jià)格壟斷的簡(jiǎn)要回顧[J];中國(guó)價(jià)格監(jiān)督檢查;2011年07期

4 黃勇;申耘宇;;第三屆中國(guó)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)政策論壇綜述[J];中國(guó)價(jià)格監(jiān)管與反壟斷;2014年08期

5 張穹;;我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段反壟斷工作的改革使命[J];價(jià)格理論與實(shí)踐;2014年01期

本文編號(hào)：2218454