發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-31 10:30

【摘要】：商標(biāo)產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口是指在某一特定產(chǎn)品的商標(biāo)已獲進(jìn)口國(guó)法律保護(hù),并且國(guó)外商標(biāo)權(quán)利人已在該國(guó)自己或授權(quán)他人制造或銷(xiāo)售的情況下,進(jìn)口商未經(jīng)授權(quán)擅自從境外進(jìn)口并在本國(guó)銷(xiāo)售該商標(biāo)產(chǎn)品的行為。商標(biāo)產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口反映了錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜的利益關(guān)系:從國(guó)家對(duì)外交往層面來(lái)說(shuō),涉及進(jìn)口國(guó)國(guó)家與出口國(guó)國(guó)家之間的利益關(guān)系;涉及維護(hù)本國(guó)企業(yè)與限制跨國(guó)企業(yè)之間的利益關(guān)系,對(duì)貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義的限制程度和對(duì)貿(mào)易自由主義的擴(kuò)張勢(shì)態(tài)會(huì)影響該國(guó)在國(guó)際關(guān)系國(guó)際社會(huì)的地位;從本國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展層面來(lái)看,涉及國(guó)內(nèi)商標(biāo)權(quán)利人、平行進(jìn)口商、消費(fèi)者等不同主體當(dāng)事人之間的利益,對(duì)私人利益的鼓勵(lì)和對(duì)公共利益的保護(hù)會(huì)直接影響不同當(dāng)事人的直接效益。它融合了本國(guó)立法和雙邊多邊條約;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的理論和國(guó)際貿(mào)易的實(shí)踐等綜合性問(wèn)題。與私人利益不同,平行進(jìn)口的合法性問(wèn)題還涉及到上游的國(guó)家政策、國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)向,國(guó)際貿(mào)易平衡,外交手段等相關(guān)問(wèn)題,僅僅從法律的角度怕無(wú)法分析周全,而專(zhuān)業(yè)背景為國(guó)際貿(mào)易、國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)的學(xué)者對(duì)該問(wèn)題已做了詳盡的數(shù)據(jù)分析可進(jìn)行參考。綜合學(xué)者的討論,目前我國(guó)的大環(huán)境適于對(duì)平行進(jìn)口持寬容態(tài)度。結(jié)合日本已經(jīng)形成的成熟的平行進(jìn)口合法性的判斷方法/依據(jù),本文通過(guò)對(duì)各要件進(jìn)行深入研究和分析,提出除了從“權(quán)利窮竭、地域性”等知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)原則性之外,在合法性的判斷要件上,以日本的三要件為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合我國(guó)的國(guó)情,對(duì)三要件原則之外做出例外規(guī)定:例如實(shí)質(zhì)性差異例外、合同許可例外等。在司法實(shí)踐中先行一步,由最高院出臺(tái)司法解釋,來(lái)確認(rèn)商標(biāo)產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口的合法性,等時(shí)機(jī)成熟后,再進(jìn)行立法補(bǔ)充。
[Abstract]:Parallel import of trademark products means that when the trademark of a particular product has been protected by the law of the importing country and the foreign trademark owner has manufactured or sold it in that country or authorized others, The importer's unauthorized import from abroad and the sale of the trademark product in his own country. The parallel import of trademark products reflects the complex interest relationship: from the aspect of the country's external relations, it involves the interest relationship between the importing country and the exporting country, and involves the maintenance of the interest relationship between the domestic enterprise and the restricted multinational enterprise. The extent of restrictions on trade protectionism and the expansion of trade liberalism will affect the country's position in the international community in international relations; in terms of domestic economic development, it involves domestic trademark rights holders, parallel importers, The interests of different parties such as consumers, the encouragement of private interests and the protection of public interests will directly affect the direct benefits of different parties. It combines national legislation with bilateral multilateral treaties, the theory of intellectual property and the practice of international trade. Unlike private interests, the legality of parallel imports also involves issues related to upstream national policies, national economic orientation, international trade balance, diplomatic means, and so on, which cannot be fully analyzed from a legal perspective alone. The professional background is international trade, and scholars of international economics have made detailed data analysis on this issue for reference. Comprehensive scholar's discussion, at present our country's big environment is suitable to hold the tolerant attitude to the parallel import. Combined with the mature judgment method / basis of the legitimacy of parallel import in Japan, this paper, through in-depth study and analysis of the various elements, puts forward that in addition to the principle of intellectual property rights, such as "exhaustion of rights, regionalism", etc. On the basis of the three elements of Japan and the national conditions of our country, this paper makes an exception to the principle of legality, such as the exception of substantial difference, the exception of contract permission, and so on. In judicial practice, the Supreme Court issued a judicial interpretation to confirm the legitimacy of parallel import of trademark products.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.295

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王曉賀;;論平行進(jìn)口的合法性[J];湖北函授大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年16期

2 朱翔;;商標(biāo)許可中的質(zhì)量控制標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];中華商標(biāo);2016年08期

3 譚再坤;;現(xiàn)貨代購(gòu)商標(biāo)侵權(quán)與例外[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

4 王心陽(yáng);;電商時(shí)代商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口的合法性分析(上)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年01期

5 姚新超;;進(jìn)口商品國(guó)內(nèi)銷(xiāo)售中的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)爭(zhēng)議啟示與借鑒[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2015年03期

6 郭軍濤;郭靜;;商標(biāo)侵權(quán)案件中被控侵權(quán)者合法來(lái)源抗辯的認(rèn)定[J];中華商標(biāo);2015年02期

7 劉維;;商標(biāo)識(shí)別功能損害判定研究[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年09期

8 于凱旋;;歐盟商標(biāo)產(chǎn)品的平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題分析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年03期

9 李士林;;商標(biāo)質(zhì)量功能論爭(zhēng)與立法抉擇[J];法治研究;2013年02期

10 田村善之;張鵬;;商標(biāo)法所保護(hù)的利益[J];法律適用;2012年10期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 施小雪;;平行進(jìn)口中的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)判定[N];中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)報(bào);2015年

2 胡宓;;非典型性平行進(jìn)口中的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定[N];中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馬樂(lè);國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易中平行進(jìn)口法律規(guī)制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 黃亦楙;論商標(biāo)的平行進(jìn)口[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

2 常凱;我國(guó)商標(biāo)平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

3 劉云川;商標(biāo)產(chǎn)品平行進(jìn)口相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題研究[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2155308