本文選題：外部人逆向刺破 + 法人人格制度　； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：法人人格獨(dú)立一直以來在現(xiàn)代公司法的相關(guān)制度構(gòu)建和具體的規(guī)定上,占據(jù)著重要的地位。但是,該理論也給了某些股東以可趁之機(jī),結(jié)果是今年來出現(xiàn)了大批的股東濫用公司獨(dú)立人格逃避公司債務(wù)和股東個(gè)人債務(wù)的情況。在前一種情形中,我國(guó)《公司法》引進(jìn)了傳統(tǒng)的刺破公司面紗制度,用法律的形式規(guī)定,對(duì)公司法人人格制度的完善進(jìn)行了初步的嘗試。但是,近年來,股東為了避免對(duì)自己的個(gè)人債權(quán)人承擔(dān)債務(wù),利用“公司”這一特殊組織形式“保護(hù)”自己的資產(chǎn),在個(gè)人和公司資本之間進(jìn)行不正當(dāng)?shù)牧鬓D(zhuǎn),對(duì)于這種情況,傳統(tǒng)刺破制度已經(jīng)無力解決。因此就存在了引進(jìn)“外部人逆向刺破公司面紗制度”的問題。本文主要內(nèi)容如下:第一部分,是概述部分,意在對(duì)外部逆向刺破進(jìn)行介紹,內(nèi)容主要有外部與內(nèi)部、逆向與正向、法人人格與人格否認(rèn)等概念,并力求通過對(duì)這些概念進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,引出與該項(xiàng)制度相關(guān)的各項(xiàng)概念和制度,為下文的論述做好鋪墊。第二部分,是引進(jìn)該制度制度的正當(dāng)性。首先,在理論基礎(chǔ)上,外部逆向刺破是法人人格獨(dú)立的必然結(jié)果,是法人人格否認(rèn)的應(yīng)有之義,具有衡平性,體現(xiàn)了誠(chéng)實(shí)信用和公司社會(huì)責(zé)任原則。其次,在現(xiàn)實(shí)依據(jù)上,法人人格制度存在固有缺陷需要法律規(guī)定予以補(bǔ)正,而我國(guó)立法缺乏相關(guān)的規(guī)定,同時(shí)司法實(shí)踐迫切需要相關(guān)的制度對(duì)股東的相關(guān)損害股東債權(quán)人利益的行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制。最后,外部人逆向刺破,存在其他制度不能替代的優(yōu)勢(shì),具有獨(dú)立存在的價(jià)值。第三部分,是對(duì)我國(guó)法未來引進(jìn)“外部人逆向刺破”制度具體的構(gòu)建的設(shè)想。從構(gòu)成要件、適用情形、舉證責(zé)任、適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、責(zé)任承擔(dān)等幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了論述。
[Abstract]:The personality independence of legal person has been playing an important role in the construction and specific regulation of modern company law. However, this theory also gives some shareholders an opportunity to avoid corporate debt and personal debt. As a result, a large number of shareholders have abused their independent personality to evade corporate debt and individual shareholder debt this year. In the former case, the Company Law of our country introduced the traditional system of piercing the veil of company, and made a preliminary attempt to perfect the system of corporate personality with the form of law. In recent years, however, in order to avoid debt to their individual creditors, shareholders have used the "company" as a special form of organization to "protect" their assets and make improper transfers between individuals and corporate capital. The traditional puncturing system has been unable to solve. Therefore, there exists the problem of introducing the system of reverse piercing of corporate veil by outsiders. The main contents of this paper are as follows: the first part is an overview part, which is intended to introduce the external reverse piercing, including external and internal, reverse and positive, corporate personality and personality denial, etc. Through the comparative analysis of these concepts, this paper draws out the concepts and systems related to the system, and lays the groundwork for the discussion below. The second part is the legitimacy of the introduction of the system. First of all, on the basis of theory, the external reverse puncture is the inevitable result of the personality independence of legal person, is the due meaning of the denial of legal person personality, has balance, and embodies the principle of good faith and corporate social responsibility. Secondly, on the basis of reality, the inherent defects of the legal personality system need to be rectified by legal provisions, but the legislation of our country lacks relevant provisions. At the same time, the judicial practice urgently needs the relevant system to regulate the shareholders' related actions that harm the interests of the shareholders' creditors. Finally, the extraneous person has the advantage which can not be replaced by other systems and has the value of independent existence. The third part is the idea of the construction of the system of "external reverse piercing" introduced into our law in the future. This paper discusses the constitutive elements, the applicable situation, the burden of proof, the applicable standard and the responsibility.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜麒麟;;反向刺破公司面紗制度的類型構(gòu)建[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

2 李南;李智博;李博_g;;淺談反向刺破公司面紗制度[J];中國(guó)外資;2013年15期

3 李雅光;;論公司人格否認(rèn)的外部反向適用[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2012年08期

4 周欣超;;外部逆向法人人格否認(rèn)制度探析[J];成都理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年02期

5 黃輝;;中國(guó)公司法人格否認(rèn)制度實(shí)證研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2012年01期

6 王麗熔;呂鈞澤;;反向刺破公司面紗制度研究[J];淮海工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

7 陳林;賈宏斌;;反向刺破公司面紗——公司法人格否認(rèn)規(guī)則的擴(kuò)張適用[J];人民司法;2010年14期

8 林瀚智;;我國(guó)公司人格否認(rèn)反向適用的司法困局與思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年06期

9 吳建斌;;公司法人格否認(rèn)成文規(guī)則適用困境的化解[J];法學(xué);2009年07期

10 孟蘭;;逆向否定法人人格原則探討[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年17期

，

本文編號(hào)：2061572