本文選題：供給側(cè)改革 + 石油價(jià)格　； 參考：《西南石油大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,我國(guó)已成為名副其實(shí)的經(jīng)濟(jì)大國(guó),但囿于產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)失衡、勞動(dòng)力短缺等癥結(jié),我國(guó)也正面臨著經(jīng)濟(jì)滯脹的新難題。有鑒于此,國(guó)家提出了供給側(cè)結(jié)構(gòu)性改革方案,根本目的是"在適度擴(kuò)大總需求的同時(shí),去產(chǎn)能、去庫(kù)存、去杠桿、降成本、補(bǔ)短板,從生產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域加強(qiáng)優(yōu)質(zhì)供給,減少無(wú)效供給,擴(kuò)大有效供給,提高供給結(jié)構(gòu)適應(yīng)性和靈活性,提高全要素生產(chǎn)率,使供給體系更好適應(yīng)需求結(jié)構(gòu)變化"。我國(guó)石油價(jià)格領(lǐng)域同樣面臨著供給側(cè)改革,一方面在國(guó)際原油供給過(guò)剩的宏觀背景下,我國(guó)原油生產(chǎn)應(yīng)趁著供給側(cè)改革的東風(fēng)主動(dòng)去產(chǎn)能、調(diào)結(jié)構(gòu);另一方面在我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展進(jìn)入新常態(tài)的大背景下,從需求側(cè)視角在未來(lái)一段時(shí)間內(nèi)我國(guó)對(duì)成品油市場(chǎng)的需求將持續(xù)穩(wěn)定,從供給側(cè)視角國(guó)內(nèi)煉油產(chǎn)能卻已初現(xiàn)過(guò)剩端倪。因此,伴隨著石油市場(chǎng)供需非均衡問(wèn)題的凸顯和我國(guó)油價(jià)領(lǐng)域固有的結(jié)構(gòu)性失靈與制度性失靈的雙重"囹圄",石油價(jià)格規(guī)制在供給側(cè)改革的驅(qū)動(dòng)下亦應(yīng)進(jìn)行全面更新,尋求能與供給側(cè)改革相匹配的制度性方案或制度性供給。進(jìn)而言之,石油價(jià)格領(lǐng)域的供給側(cè)改革要求政府革新規(guī)制范式,要求政府依憑法律規(guī)范,從體制上、制度供給上改變現(xiàn)有的低效、無(wú)序、行政壟斷特色的成品油供給體系,建立合理的成品油產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu),營(yíng)造公平的成品油市場(chǎng),并在此基礎(chǔ)上著力提高成品油供給的質(zhì)量和效率。石油價(jià)格法律規(guī)制并非簡(jiǎn)單的價(jià)格規(guī)制,其牽涉到產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整、市場(chǎng)化等諸多體制性因素。我國(guó)石油價(jià)格法律規(guī)制面臨的實(shí)踐困境折射出當(dāng)前石油價(jià)格規(guī)制被俘獲以及部門利益與集團(tuán)利益的路徑依賴。而我國(guó)現(xiàn)行石油價(jià)格法律規(guī)制的現(xiàn)狀也不容樂(lè)觀,存在以下問(wèn)題:其一,法律的隱匿與規(guī)制體系的斷裂;其二,規(guī)制主體缺乏專業(yè)性和獨(dú)立性;其三,權(quán)法矛盾下的制度失范;其四,程序制度供給失衡。本文在此情景下,以石油價(jià)格法律規(guī)制的改革為立論,在分析現(xiàn)有石油價(jià)格法律規(guī)制的缺陷及其成因的基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)而從法律規(guī)制的方式、法律規(guī)制的主體、法律規(guī)制的范圍、法律規(guī)制的模式、法律規(guī)制的程序五方面提出重塑石油價(jià)格的制度供給模式。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy, China has become a real economic country, but due to overcapacity, industrial structure imbalance, labor shortage and other sticking points, China is also facing a new problem of economic stagflation. In view of this, the country has put forward a supply-side structural reform plan, the fundamental purpose of which is "to expand aggregate demand moderately, to remove production capacity, to destock, to deleverage, to reduce costs, to make up for shortcomings, and to strengthen quality supply from the production field." Reduce ineffective supply, expand effective supply, improve adaptability and flexibility of supply structure, raise total factor productivity, make supply system better adapt to change of demand structure. China's oil price field is also facing supply-side reform. On the one hand, under the macro background of international crude oil supply surplus, China's crude oil production should take the advantage of supply-side reform to take the initiative to produce capacity and adjust the structure; On the other hand, under the background of China's economic development entering the new normal, the demand for refined oil products market in China will remain stable in the future from the demand-side perspective, but the surplus production capacity in domestic oil refining from the supply-side perspective has initially appeared. Therefore, with the highlight of the imbalance between supply and demand in the oil market and the dual "imprisonment" of the inherent structural failure and institutional failure in the field of oil prices in China, the regulation of oil prices should also be comprehensively renewed under the drive of supply-side reform. To seek institutional schemes or institutional supply that can be matched with supply-side reforms. Furthermore, the supply-side reform in the field of oil prices requires the government to innovate the regulatory paradigm and to change the existing supply system of refined oil products with characteristics of inefficient, disorderly and administrative monopoly according to the legal norms and the system of institutional supply. To establish a reasonable industrial structure of oil products, to create a fair oil market, and on this basis to improve the quality and efficiency of oil products supply. Legal regulation of oil price is not a simple price regulation, which involves many institutional factors, such as industrial structure adjustment, marketization and so on. The practical dilemma of the legal regulation of oil prices in China reflects the capture of the current regulation of oil prices and the dependence of the path between the interests of the sector and the interests of the group. However, the current situation of legal regulation of oil price in China is not optimistic, there are the following problems: first, the concealment of law and the breakage of regulation system; secondly, the lack of professionalism and independence of the subject of regulation; thirdly, the system anomie under the contradiction of power law; Fourth, procedural system supply imbalance. Based on the analysis of the defects and causes of the existing legal regulation of oil price, this paper takes the reform of legal regulation of oil price as an argument, and then from the way of legal regulation, the subject of legal regulation, the scope of legal regulation. The model of legal regulation and the procedure of legal regulation put forward the institutional supply mode of reshaping oil price.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南石油大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 畢吉耀;油價(jià)井噴的政經(jīng)潛流 國(guó)際石油價(jià)格暴漲的原因與走勢(shì)及其影響[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號(hào)：2053689