發(fā)布時間：2018-06-05 05:33

  本文選題：消費稅 + 立法　； 參考：《吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在最近幾年消費稅的頻繁調(diào)整引起了民眾對于行政機關(guān)收稅立法權(quán)合法性的探討。如何去認識消費稅、如何完善消費稅制度以及如何使得消費稅的調(diào)整符合稅收法定原則,本文從這幾點出發(fā)進行了論述。當(dāng)前我國消費稅的征收主要依據(jù)行政法規(guī),對于課稅要素的調(diào)整則多以部門規(guī)章的形式進行,消費稅法規(guī)在法律位階上的問題已經(jīng)凸顯。首先,文中闡述了消費稅的一般概念。消費稅是一種不同于其他對于貨物普遍征收的稅費,是選定特定的商品進行加征。基于此概念又引申出了消費稅的主要特點,具有范圍特定、易于轉(zhuǎn)嫁及具有累退性明顯。消費稅相比于其他稅種具有針對性強調(diào)節(jié)靈活、稅源集中便于征收、導(dǎo)向鮮明及減免情況特殊的特點。其次,立足于我國消費稅法律制度現(xiàn)狀分析,著重介紹了2006年的消費稅調(diào)整的情況,此次的消費稅調(diào)整是自稅種設(shè)立以來最大的一次調(diào)整,不僅增加了三個大類的商品還突出了消費稅的兩個重要作用,以消費稅來實現(xiàn)環(huán)境保護限制資源消耗和引導(dǎo)理性消費間接平衡收入分配。仔細分析此次調(diào)整有利于把握我國消費稅的改革方向,為消費稅立法完善提供現(xiàn)實依據(jù)。隨后總結(jié)了我國消費稅行政法規(guī)存在的諸多問題:在法律層面存在著立法層級低、不符合稅收法定原則、立法過程中民主程度不高、授權(quán)被過度使用。在消費稅制度設(shè)計上存在著征收范圍局限不能適應(yīng)政策需要,以及價內(nèi)計稅不利于調(diào)節(jié)目的實現(xiàn)的問題。然后,介紹了西方國家的消費稅立法情況,其中美國注重以消費稅收入設(shè)立特定基金,對相關(guān)項目進行建設(shè)維護,做到專款專用的目的。美國、俄羅斯、法國稅種的設(shè)立都由立法機關(guān)以法律的形式來體現(xiàn)的,如美國的《美國國內(nèi)收入法典》、俄羅斯的《俄羅斯聯(lián)邦稅收法典》和法國的《法國稅法典》。在稅收立法過程中注重立法原則,憲法原則、法治原則、民主原則、科學(xué)原則在法律中均有體現(xiàn)。對于稅收立法工作的準(zhǔn)備工作也比較充足,一個法律草案的產(chǎn)生先需要經(jīng)過多個專業(yè)機構(gòu)的分析、討論、研究、審查,通過專家和學(xué)者對稅收法律產(chǎn)生的社會影響做出充分的評估,然后再通過立法機構(gòu)進行表決,從而保證稅收法律的嚴(yán)謹科學(xué)。最后,根據(jù)國外經(jīng)驗及國內(nèi)現(xiàn)狀進行總結(jié)論述,提出了對我國消費稅立法完善的建議。在立法程序方面,要確立立法原則,以便在今后的立法修法過程中起到指引作用。其中稅收法定原則是立法原則的根本,稅收法定原則的落實可以理清稅收立法權(quán)的配置及歸屬問題,明確立法機關(guān)及行政機關(guān)的權(quán)力邊界,對于納稅人依法納稅,行政機關(guān)依法征稅具有不可替代的作用。稅收法律因其具有專業(yè)性技術(shù)性,稅收法定原則的執(zhí)行不能完全禁止授權(quán),但是要求在立法程序中明確授權(quán)內(nèi)容,并在授權(quán)后應(yīng)全程監(jiān)督被授權(quán)機關(guān)的授權(quán)使用是否合法,追蹤確保所授權(quán)力被正確有效使用以促進授權(quán)目的有效實現(xiàn)。在稅收法律執(zhí)行程序中建立定期評估制度,對稅目、稅率、征稅環(huán)節(jié)等課稅要素進行必要性、合理性評估。在消費稅立法內(nèi)容上提出了四點完善建議:一是實行價外征稅對于實現(xiàn)國家消費調(diào)節(jié)政策、引導(dǎo)消費方向、調(diào)節(jié)消費結(jié)構(gòu)和限制特定商品消費具有積極意義;二是消費稅中央地方共享,建立專項基金以便用于保護環(huán)境、特定項目維護、節(jié)約能源;三是將部分服務(wù)業(yè)納入消費稅征收范圍有助于實現(xiàn)收入再分配,引導(dǎo)消費行為;四是將消費稅功能在立法中明確,將會使得今后的稅目調(diào)整更具有方向性,也更符合法律的可預(yù)測性,并且有利于社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the frequent adjustment of the consumption tax has caused the people to discuss the legality of the legislative power of the administrative organs. How to understand the consumption tax, how to improve the consumption tax system and how to make the adjustment of the consumption tax conform to the statutory principle of tax revenue, this paper has discussed from these points. The current levy of consumption tax in China is mainly dependent on the collection of the consumption tax. According to the administrative regulations, the adjustment of the elements of taxation is mostly carried out in the form of departmental regulations. The problem of the consumption tax laws in the order of the law has been highlighted. First, the general concept of the consumption tax is expounded. The consumption tax is a tax, which is different from the general levy on goods, is a selection of the selected specific goods. It also extends the main characteristics of the consumption tax, which has a specific scope, easy to transfer and has obvious remission. Compared with the other taxes, the consumption tax has the specific emphasis on the flexibility, the tax collection is easy to collect, the guidance is distinct and the special characteristics of the reduction and exemptions. Secondly, the current situation analysis of the legal system of the consumption tax in China is based on the introduction of the present situation. In the case of the adjustment of the consumption tax in 2006, the adjustment of the consumption tax was the biggest adjustment since the establishment of the tax. It not only increased the three major categories of commodities but also highlighted the two important functions of the consumption tax. The consumption tax was used to limit the consumption of the resources and to guide the indirect balance of the income distribution. The adjustment is beneficial to grasp the direction of the reform of the consumption tax in China and provide practical basis for the consummation of the consumption tax legislation. Then, it summarizes many problems in the administrative regulations of the consumption tax in our country: there is a low level of legislation at the legal level, which is not in accordance with the principle of tax law, the degree of civil ownership in the legislative process is not high, and the authorization is overused. In degree design, there is a limitation that the limits of the collection can not meet the needs of the policy and the internal valuation is not conducive to the purpose of adjustment. Then, the consumption tax legislation in the western countries is introduced. In the United States, the United States focuses on the establishment of a specific fund for the construction and maintenance of the related projects, and the purpose of special funds for the related projects. Ross, the establishment of French taxes is embodied by the legislature in the form of law, such as the American domestic revenue code, Russia's Russian Federation tax code and France's French tax code. In the process of tax legislation, it pays attention to legislative principles, constitutional principles, rule of law, democratic principles, and scientific principles in the law. The preparation of the tax legislative work is also sufficient. The production of a draft law needs to be analyzed, discussed, studied and reviewed by a number of professional institutions, and a full assessment is made by experts and scholars on the social impact of the tax law, and then a vote by the legislature to ensure the tax law. In the end, according to the foreign experience and the domestic present situation, this paper puts forward the suggestion to consummate the legislation of the consumption tax in our country. In the aspect of legislative procedure, we should establish the principle of legislation so as to play a guiding role in the process of legislative revision in the future. The principle of tax law is the fundamental of the legislative principle and the implementation of the principle of tax law. It is possible to clarify the allocation and ownership of the legislative power of tax, clear the power boundary of the legislative organs and administrative organs, pay tax to the taxpayers, and tax the administrative organs according to law. Because of their professional technical nature, the implementation of the principle of tax law can not completely prohibit the authorization, but it is required in the legislation. In the procedure, the authorized content should be clearly defined, and the authorized use of the authorized organ should be monitored all the way after the authorization, and the tracking ensures the right and effective use of the power of authorization to promote the effective realization of the purpose of authorization. Four suggestions are put forward on the content of the consumption tax legislation: first, the implementation of the external tax is positive for the realization of the national consumption regulation policy, the direction of consumption, the adjustment of the consumption structure and the restriction of specific commodity consumption; the two is the sharing of the central local consumption tax and the establishment of special funds for the protection of the environment. Three is to bring part of the service industry into the consumption tax collection scope to help realize the redistribution of income and guide the consumption behavior; the four is to make the function of the consumption tax clear in the legislation, which will make the future tax adjustment more directional, more in line with the predictability of the law, and is beneficial to the development of the society and economy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.22

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王榮;試論稅收法定原則[J];遼寧稅務(wù)高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2001年02期

2 王鴻貌;稅收法定原則之再研究[J];法學(xué)評論;2004年03期

3 張永忠;跛腳的稅收法定原則[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2005年04期

4 朱伯玉;論稅收法定原則[J];商業(yè)時代;2005年29期

5 翟繼光;稅收法定原則比較研究——稅收立憲的角度[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

6 王野;;論稅收法定原則的憲法缺失[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年03期

7 秦梅玉;;論我國稅收法定原則入憲[J];法制與社會;2007年01期

8 周密;;論稅收法定原則入憲[J];山東紡織經(jīng)濟;2007年04期

9 馮婕;;淺議稅收法定原則[J];消費導(dǎo)刊;2008年03期

10 陳璐;;論稅收法定原則[J];法制與社會;2010年08期

相關(guān)會議論文 前4條

1 趙芳春;肖正軍;;稅收法定原則內(nèi)含的悖論及其原因分析[A];財稅法論叢（第7卷）[C];2005年

2 楊秋林;;試論我國稅收法定制度的憲法依據(jù)[A];財稅法論叢（第13卷）[C];2013年

3 李俊明;;稅收優(yōu)惠制度的價值與法理分析[A];財稅法論叢（第13卷）[C];2013年

4 何欽強;;醫(yī)療機構(gòu)改革的稅法問題研究[A];財稅法論叢(第2卷)[C];2003年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 湖南省國稅局局長 丁永安;落實稅收法定原則 推進稅收依法行政[N];中國稅務(wù)報;2014年

2 吳睿鶇;稅收法定應(yīng)寫進憲法[N];光明日報;2013年

3 吳睿鶇;“稅收法定”應(yīng)寫進憲法[N];上海金融報;2013年

4 武君;落實稅收法定原則 實現(xiàn)依法治稅[N];人民政協(xié)報;2013年

5 教師 葉祝頤;征稅坐地起價違背稅收法定原則[N];企業(yè)家日報;2013年

6 北京大學(xué)財經(jīng)法研究中心主任 劉劍文;如何準(zhǔn)確理解稅收法定原則[N];經(jīng)濟參考報;2013年

7 本報記者 單曉宇;落實稅收法定原則：需要時間表和路線圖[N];中國稅務(wù)報;2014年

8 本報記者 寇紅 單曉宇;落實稅收法定原則需要更寬的視野[N];中國稅務(wù)報;2014年

9 本報記者 許浩;劉劍文：落實稅收法定原則可分三個階段進行[N];中國經(jīng)營報;2014年

10 中共長治市委黨校 郭惠萍;關(guān)于稅收法定原則的思考[N];山西黨校報;2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 宋槿籬;中國稅收法定原則研究[D];中國財政科學(xué)研究院;2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 童樹標(biāo);稅收法定原則研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2011年

2 張婭;落實稅收法定原則的路徑研究[D];吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

3 程前;英國稅收法定原則研究（13-17世紀(jì)）[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

4 劉園;我國中央和地方政府間財權(quán)與事權(quán)的平衡性研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2016年

5 王相;論稅收法定原則—立法法修改后的思考[D];蘇州大學(xué);2016年

6 牛東坤;論稅收法定原則及其實現(xiàn)[D];河北大學(xué);2015年

7 高雅;我國消費稅法律問題研究[D];西北大學(xué);2016年

8 張藝馨;論稅收法定原則的落實[D];東北財經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

9 李明;稅收法定原則研究[D];吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué);2017年

10 李哲;我國消費稅法律制度問題研究[D];吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：1980787