發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-30 12:31

  本文選題：反壟斷法 + 軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)的發(fā)展可謂翻天覆地,如今的網(wǎng)絡(luò)可以稱之為這個(gè)時(shí)代的標(biāo)志。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)上產(chǎn)生了相應(yīng)的信息產(chǎn)業(yè)。軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)作為信息產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的核心,在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中起著至關(guān)重要的作用,不僅把經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)推向高級(jí)化,還極大地方便了我們的生活,推動(dòng)了社會(huì)進(jìn)步。各國無一例外地把軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)放在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的優(yōu)先位置。但是任何事物的發(fā)展都有兩面性,軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)在發(fā)展的同時(shí)帶來了一系列問題,本文主要是考察軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)帶來的壟斷性問題。近年來,世界范圍內(nèi)軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)的壟斷案件不斷增多,壟斷對(duì)軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展十分不利。軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展不僅需要技術(shù)和人才,更需要一個(gè)公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的市場(chǎng)環(huán)境。所以越來越多的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家和法學(xué)家開始關(guān)注軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)的反壟斷問題。反壟斷法中一個(gè)重要的概念就是相關(guān)市場(chǎng),相關(guān)市場(chǎng)的界定在認(rèn)定市場(chǎng)支配地位時(shí)起著關(guān)鍵性的作用,各國在制定反壟斷法時(shí)都將相關(guān)市場(chǎng)的界定納入其中,因?yàn)殡x開了相關(guān)市場(chǎng),很多案件的壟斷行為無法認(rèn)定。相關(guān)市場(chǎng)主要是從相關(guān)產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)、相關(guān)地域市場(chǎng)和相關(guān)時(shí)間市場(chǎng)將涉案企業(yè)限定在一定范圍內(nèi),在這一范圍內(nèi)認(rèn)定涉案企業(yè)的行為是否限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。傳統(tǒng)界定相關(guān)市場(chǎng)的方法主要包括定性上的替代性分析方法和定量上的SSNIP測(cè)試方法,這些方法都是建立在單邊市場(chǎng)思維基礎(chǔ)上的。而軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)有著不同于傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)的特征,最顯著的特征就是軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)具有雙邊市場(chǎng)性。雙邊市場(chǎng)理論雖然早已出現(xiàn),但是一直沒有受到重視,直到銀行卡壟斷案件頻發(fā)才逐漸引起學(xué)者的關(guān)注。雙邊市場(chǎng)是兩邊的用戶需要通過平臺(tái)企業(yè)進(jìn)行交易,一邊的價(jià)值取決于另一邊的用戶數(shù)量。就軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)來說,雙邊市場(chǎng)就是軟件平臺(tái)要同時(shí)向應(yīng)用軟件提供者和用戶提供產(chǎn)品和服務(wù),也只有兩邊的用戶同時(shí)對(duì)軟件平臺(tái)有需求時(shí),平臺(tái)的研發(fā)者才能實(shí)現(xiàn)其價(jià)值。軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)的雙邊市場(chǎng)特性給傳統(tǒng)的相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定方法帶來了巨大的挑戰(zhàn)。比如軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)這一新興產(chǎn)業(yè)有哪些不同于傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)的新特征?雙邊市場(chǎng)理論對(duì)相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定帶來哪些困難?傳統(tǒng)的相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定方法是否適用于軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)?實(shí)踐中如何克服軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定的困難?縱觀各國反壟斷法,沒有一個(gè)國家明確規(guī)定了軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)界定相關(guān)市場(chǎng)的方法,這就需要我們一步步地在理論和實(shí)踐中進(jìn)行探索和研究,在翻閱了大量國內(nèi)外相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定方面文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,本文擬對(duì)雙邊市場(chǎng)條件下軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)如何界定相關(guān)市場(chǎng)進(jìn)行探討。
[Abstract]:The development of network can be described as earth-shaking, today's network can be called the symbol of this era. On the basis of the development of the network, the corresponding information industry has emerged. As the core of the development of information industry, software industry plays a vital role in the economic development. It not only pushes the economic structure to a higher level, but also greatly facilitates our life and promotes social progress. Countries without exception put the software industry in the priority position of economic development. However, there are two sides to the development of everything. The software industry brings a series of problems while it develops. This paper mainly examines the monopoly problems brought by software industry. In recent years, there are more and more monopoly cases in the software industry, which is unfavorable to the development of the software industry. The development of software industry needs not only technology and talents, but also a fair market environment. So more and more economists and jurists begin to pay attention to the anti-monopoly problem of software industry. An important concept in anti-monopoly law is the related market. The definition of relevant market plays a key role in determining the dominant position of the market. All countries include the definition of the relevant market in the formulation of anti-monopoly law. Because of leaving the relevant market, many cases of monopoly behavior can not be identified. The related market is mainly from the related product market, the related regional market and the relevant time market to limit the enterprise involved in a certain range, in this range to determine whether the behavior of the enterprises involved limits competition. The traditional methods of defining relevant markets mainly include qualitative alternative analysis method and quantitative SSNIP test method. These methods are based on unilateral market thinking. The software industry is different from the traditional industry, the most obvious feature is that the software industry has a bilateral market. Although the theory of bilateral market has appeared for a long time, it has not been paid much attention until the frequent cases of bank card monopoly. Bilateral markets are where users on both sides need to trade through the platform, depending on the number of users on the other side. As far as software industry is concerned, the bilateral market is that the software platform should provide products and services to the application software providers and users simultaneously, and only if the users on both sides need the software platform at the same time, the developers of the platform can realize its value. The bilateral market characteristics of the software industry bring great challenges to the traditional relevant market definition methods. For example, what are the new features of software industry, which are different from traditional industries? What difficulties does bilateral market theory bring to the definition of relevant markets? Is the traditional market definition method applicable to the software industry? How to overcome the difficulties of defining the relevant market in the software industry in practice? Throughout the anti-monopoly law, none of the countries clearly defined the software industry to define the relevant market methods, which requires us to step by step in theory and practice in the exploration and research, On the basis of reviewing a large number of domestic and foreign literature on the definition of relevant markets, this paper intends to discuss how to define the relevant markets under the conditions of bilateral markets.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D912.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張志奇;;相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定的方法及其缺陷[J];北京行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李泉;雙邊市場(chǎng)價(jià)格理論及其產(chǎn)業(yè)應(yīng)用研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2008年

2 張小強(qiáng);網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)的反壟斷法規(guī)制[D];重慶大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 繆文燕;論雙邊市場(chǎng)條件下相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定的困境及出路[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

2 黃杰;論反壟斷法對(duì)雙邊市場(chǎng)中平臺(tái)企業(yè)的適用[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1955312