發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-15 12:01

  本文選題：小額貸款 + 審慎監(jiān)管��； 參考：《江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前全國(guó)小額貸款公司近九千家左右,有力地解決了民間融資難的問(wèn)題,獲得了社會(huì)的認(rèn)同,有了較為寬松的制度環(huán)境,但明顯缺乏相應(yīng)的市場(chǎng)準(zhǔn)入機(jī)制及規(guī)范的運(yùn)作程序。小貸公司運(yùn)作中監(jiān)管定位不清、尺度寬嚴(yán)不一、監(jiān)管手段單一、監(jiān)管部門(mén)自由裁量權(quán)隨意性等系列問(wèn)題嚴(yán)重影響和妨礙了小貸行業(yè)的發(fā)展。據(jù)此,本文從公法強(qiáng)化與私法激勵(lì)這兩種視角,探索了小貸行業(yè)的審慎監(jiān)管問(wèn)題。全文共分為五章。第一章闡述了小貸公司概況及法律特征。第二章分析監(jiān)管現(xiàn)狀與現(xiàn)行制度不足,站在公法與私法的兩種視角,重新審視目前法律監(jiān)管所面臨的缺陷:一是監(jiān)管過(guò)度和泛濫,二是監(jiān)管不足和過(guò)偏。前者主要表現(xiàn)為:較高的貸款利率及準(zhǔn)入門(mén)檻阻礙市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、融資市場(chǎng)資金供求相互割裂、對(duì)抵(質(zhì))押財(cái)產(chǎn)限制過(guò)多、稅負(fù)承受力差。后者主要表現(xiàn)為:較低法律位階使行政監(jiān)管困難、各地政府金融辦專業(yè)能力缺乏導(dǎo)致風(fēng)險(xiǎn)頻發(fā)、行業(yè)內(nèi)部風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制意識(shí)不足、違法成本低對(duì)逆向選擇產(chǎn)生強(qiáng)大激勵(lì)。以上問(wèn)題反映出國(guó)家在履行經(jīng)濟(jì)職能時(shí)應(yīng)采取有限理性,防止小額貸款公司“目標(biāo)偏移”,從而引導(dǎo)普惠金融的健康發(fā)展。第三章結(jié)合上述實(shí)踐中面臨或引發(fā)的相關(guān)問(wèn)題,提出實(shí)施小額貸款公司審慎監(jiān)管的主要理論基礎(chǔ),即外部成本論和存在價(jià)值論。其中,外部成本論又分為俘獲論、尋租論。這些理論揭示了缺乏任何一種都無(wú)法完整地描繪出審慎監(jiān)管的藍(lán)圖。第四章從國(guó)際金融危機(jī)后的相關(guān)法律和小額貸款公司發(fā)展的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn)上,通過(guò)比較域外監(jiān)管相關(guān)實(shí)踐,為構(gòu)建我國(guó)的審慎監(jiān)管體系提供法律上的借鑒。第五章為總結(jié)章,提出構(gòu)建我國(guó)小貸公司審慎監(jiān)管的體系的構(gòu)思與建議。以及監(jiān)管主體應(yīng)盡的職責(zé)、目標(biāo)。從公私兩方面討論了我國(guó)小貸公司法律審慎監(jiān)管制度的完善。一方面,公法手段是硬性的,存在著必要與謹(jǐn)慎。針對(duì)監(jiān)管不足和過(guò)偏,應(yīng)當(dāng)在公法導(dǎo)向下對(duì)審慎監(jiān)管加以強(qiáng)化;另一方面,私法手段是柔性的,但也要注意方式。針對(duì)監(jiān)管過(guò)度與泛濫,應(yīng)當(dāng)在私法導(dǎo)向下強(qiáng)調(diào)法律激勵(lì)的運(yùn)用。法律干預(yù)應(yīng)將公法手段與私法手段妥善配置、中性運(yùn)用、謹(jǐn)慎監(jiān)管。
[Abstract]:At present, there are nearly 9,000 micro-loan companies in China, which have solved the problem of the difficulty of private financing, have been recognized by the society, and have a relatively loose institutional environment, but they obviously lack the corresponding market access mechanism and standardized operating procedures. In the operation of small loan companies, a series of problems, such as unclear regulatory position, wide and strict standards, single regulatory means and arbitrary discretion of regulatory authorities, have seriously affected and hindered the development of the small loan industry. Based on this, this paper explores the prudential supervision of small loan industry from the perspectives of strengthening public law and encouraging private law. The full text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter describes the general situation and legal characteristics of small loan companies. The second chapter analyzes the current situation of supervision and the insufficiency of the current system. From the two perspectives of public and private law, it re-examines the defects of current legal supervision: one is overregulation and overflowing, the other is insufficient and excessive supervision. The former mainly shows that higher loan interest rate and entry threshold hinder market competition, fund supply and demand in financing market are separated from each other, too many restrictions on collateral property and poor tax bearing capacity. The latter mainly shows that the lower legal rank makes administrative supervision difficult, the lack of professional ability of local governments and financial offices leads to frequent risk occurrence, the lack of awareness of risk control within the industry, and the low cost of illegal law create strong incentives for adverse selection. The above problems reflect that the state should take limited rationality in performing its economic function to prevent the "target deviation" of microfinance companies, and thus guide the healthy development of inclusive finance. The third chapter puts forward the main theoretical basis of implementing the prudential supervision of microfinance companies, namely, the external cost theory and the existential value theory, in combination with the problems faced or caused by the above mentioned practices. Among them, external cost theory is divided into capture theory and rent-seeking theory. These theories reveal that no one can provide a complete blueprint for prudential regulation. The fourth chapter from the relevant laws after the international financial crisis and the experience and lessons of the development of microfinance companies, through the comparison of extraterritorial regulatory practices, for the construction of China's prudential regulatory system to provide legal reference. The fifth chapter is the summary chapter, puts forward the conception and suggestion of constructing the system of the small loan company's prudential supervision in our country. And the duties and objectives of the supervisory body. This paper discusses the perfection of legal prudential supervision system of small loan companies in China from both public and private aspects. On the one hand, the means of public law are rigid and necessary and prudent. In view of inadequate and excessive supervision, prudent supervision should be strengthened under the guidance of public law; on the other hand, the means of private law are flexible, but they should also be paid attention to. In the light of excessive and overflowing supervision, the application of legal incentives should be emphasized under the guidance of private law. Legal intervention should properly allocate public law and private law means, neutral application and careful supervision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.282

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫良順;;如何破解小額貸款公司發(fā)展中的困境——基于政策環(huán)境視角[J];北京工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年04期

2 張龍耀;楊駿;程恩江;;融資杠桿監(jiān)管與小額貸款公司“覆蓋率-可持續(xù)性”權(quán)衡——基于分層監(jiān)管的準(zhǔn)自然實(shí)驗(yàn)[J];金融研究;2016年06期

3 鄭寧;;小額貸款公司稅收管理風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與防范[J];稅務(wù)研究;2016年06期

4 羿建華;郭峰;;小額貸款公司:中國(guó)普惠金融發(fā)展的制度化開(kāi)端[J];理論學(xué)刊;2015年02期

5 耿欣;馮波;;小額貸款公司運(yùn)營(yíng)及其可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究——以山東小貸公司為例[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年01期

6 劉迎霜;;論我國(guó)中央銀行金融監(jiān)管職能的法制化——以宏觀審慎監(jiān)管為視角[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2014年03期

7 周孟亮;李俊;;普惠金融視角下小額貸款公司監(jiān)管模式研究[J];吉首大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

8 余紹山;陳斌彬;;從微觀審慎到宏觀審慎:后危機(jī)時(shí)代國(guó)際金融監(jiān)管法制的轉(zhuǎn)型及啟示[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2013年03期

9 范小云;王道平;;巴塞爾Ⅲ在監(jiān)管理論與框架上的改進(jìn):微觀與宏觀審慎有機(jī)結(jié)合[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2012年01期

10 何一峰;江翔宇;;準(zhǔn)金融機(jī)構(gòu)監(jiān)管現(xiàn)狀、問(wèn)題及對(duì)策初探[J];上海保險(xiǎn);2011年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉明康;;大力借鑒《核心原則》全面推進(jìn)我國(guó)有效銀行監(jiān)管體系建設(shè)[N];國(guó)際金融報(bào);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 姜斐然;小額貸款公司目標(biāo)偏移研究[D];山東大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1892383