本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸 + 擔保模式　； 參考：《華東政法大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：民間網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸是近年新興起的民間融資形式,其快速發(fā)展與我國金融信貸市場長期存在的結(jié)構(gòu)失衡有關(guān),這是一種不同于傳統(tǒng)銀行間接融資模式和資本市場直接融資的新型融資模式。其存在和發(fā)展一定程度上活躍了金融市場,對中小微型企業(yè)和個人融資難的問題提供了破解思路。但就目前來看,網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸機構(gòu)的運營模式不一,平臺角色不明,對借款人的審查缺乏統(tǒng)一的信用評級標準和綜合信用評價體系,法律監(jiān)管不到位等問題都制約著網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺的發(fā)展。因此,剖析網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸主體及參與者之間的法律關(guān)系,明確網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺的角色定位,提出行之有效的監(jiān)管措施,對網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的發(fā)展至關(guān)重要。探究各網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺擔保模式的優(yōu)劣,優(yōu)化創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺的擔保模式,這是本文研究的重點。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸發(fā)展過程中,產(chǎn)生了多種經(jīng)營模式,從最初的信用借貸到要求提供擔保,再到擔保模式的細分。對網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸擔保模進行探究,有益于網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸行業(yè)的發(fā)展。本文除引言、結(jié)論外分為以下三部分內(nèi)容:第一部分是關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的基本概述。對網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺的運營模式和發(fā)展歷史進行梳理,并對國外的網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺進行了簡略介紹。通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸與其他互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融模式進行概念區(qū)分來界定網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的概念,總結(jié)出網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的特點和作用。第二部分是網(wǎng)絡(luò)貸款擔保制度現(xiàn)狀透視。以是否需要擔保和擔保提供人為標準可對網(wǎng)絡(luò)貸款平臺運營模式分為無擔保模式、網(wǎng)絡(luò)貸款平臺擔保模式、第三方擔保模式和借款人擔保模式四種。最初,無擔保模式即為小額信用貸款,這是網(wǎng)絡(luò)貸款最初存在并吸引投資人和借款人的最大特點。但隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)貸款的發(fā)展無擔保模式的弊端逐漸顯現(xiàn),反而制約了網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的發(fā)展。隨即,諸多網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺開始以加強對借款人的身份驗證、根據(jù)借款人信息(身份證、戶口簿、銀行卡、收入證明、工作證明等)提供的多寡和質(zhì)量的高低對其進行信用劃級等方式來降低風險,并為信用等級較高的客戶向投資人提供擔保。但是由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)的虛擬性和提供信息的電子化使信息作假大量存在,導致許多借貸平臺存在很大的風險。加之對借貸平臺法律定位不清,其是否具備擔保資格和經(jīng)營資格尚存爭論。然后,部分網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺吸取經(jīng)驗教訓引入專業(yè)擔保公司為投資人擔保,這便將網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺的的風險轉(zhuǎn)移到擔保機構(gòu)中。事實上網(wǎng)絡(luò)貸款自身的高風險并沒有實質(zhì)的減少,這樣做的結(jié)果導致?lián)９境袚唢L險倒閉。最后,以借款人提供擔保的網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸模式是風險最低,最具有保障的一種,但是也存在擔保物范圍狹窄、擔保物流轉(zhuǎn)受限制等問題。第三部分是網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸擔保的優(yōu)化和規(guī)范建議。根據(jù)第二部分對各擔保模式的透視首先提出了網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸嚴格限制信用貸款的模式。其次提出網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸效率和安全并重、網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺角色的回歸和實質(zhì)的借款人擔保和形式的擔保機構(gòu)擔保等網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸擔保優(yōu)化建議和措施。最后對完善網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸擔保配套制度也提出了優(yōu)化網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸征信路徑和加強中介服務(wù)商監(jiān)管等切實可行的措施。
[Abstract]:Private network lending is a new form of non-governmental financing in recent years. Its rapid development is related to the long-standing structural imbalance in the financial credit market of China. This is a new financing model different from the traditional bank indirect financing model and the direct financing of the capital market. At present, the operation mode of the network lending institutions is different, the role of the platform is unclear, the lack of unified credit rating standards and the comprehensive credit evaluation system for the borrower's review, the lack of legal supervision and so on, which restrict the development of the network lending platform. To analyze the legal relationship between the subject and the participants of the network, define the role of the network lending platform, and put forward the effective supervision measures, which is very important to the development of the network lending. It is the focus of this study to explore the advantages and disadvantages of the guarantee mode of the network lending platform and optimize the guarantee mode of the innovation network lending platform. In the course of the development of collateral loan, there are a variety of business models, from the initial credit loan to the requirement to provide guarantee, and then to the subdivision of the guarantee model. It is beneficial to the development of the network lending industry. This article is divided into the following three parts except the introduction: the first part is about the basic probability of network lending. The operation mode and development history of the network lending platform are combed, and the network lending platform abroad is briefly introduced. The concept of network lending is defined through the concept distinction between network lending and other Internet financial models, and the characteristics and functions of network lending are summarized. The second part is the network loan guarantee system. Current situation perspective. The network loan platform operation mode can be divided into non guarantee mode, network loan platform guarantee mode, third party guarantee mode and borrower guarantee mode, four kinds of credit loan platform operation mode. At first, the non guarantee mode is small credit loan, which is the initial existence and attracting investors of the network loan. But with the biggest characteristics of the borrower, but with the development of the unsecured mode of the development of network loans, the development of network lending is restricted. Then, many network lending platforms begin to strengthen the identification of borrowers, and provide more information based on the borrower information (ID card, account book, bank card, income proof, work proof, etc.) Oligarchy and quality have a credit rating to reduce risks and provide security for investors with higher credit levels. However, because of the virtual nature of the network and the electronization of information, there are a lot of false information, which leads to a lot of risk in the lending platform. There is a debate about whether it has a security qualification and management qualifications. Then, some of the network lending platform draws lessons from the professional Guarantee Corporation to guarantee the investor, which transfers the risk of the network lending platform to the guarantee agency. In fact, the high risk of the network loan is not substantially reduced, and the result of this result is the result. The Guarantee Corporation has a high risk of bankruptcy. Finally, the network lending model with the borrower's guarantee is the lowest risk and the most guaranteed, but there are also some problems such as the narrow scope of the guarantee and the limitation of the guarantee logistics. The third part is the optimization and the standard suggestion of the network loan guarantee. According to the second part of the guarantee model, First, it puts forward the mode of strictly restricting credit loan by network lending. Secondly, it puts forward the optimization suggestions and measures of network lending efficiency and security, the return of the role of the network lending platform, the substantial borrower guarantee and the guarantee of the form of guarantee institutions. Finally, it also proposes to improve the supporting system for the guarantee of the network loan guarantee. Some feasible measures have been put forward, such as optimizing the path of credit collection and lending, and strengthening the supervision of intermediary service providers.

【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.28

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡小梅;我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)銀行的風險與控制[J];江西行政學院學報;2005年S1期

2 趙艷;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融監(jiān)管的難點及對策探究[J];學理論;2011年01期

3 霍翠鳳;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融的創(chuàng)新效應(yīng)[J];軍事經(jīng)濟研究;2009年06期

4 馮鵬志;值得提防的“網(wǎng)絡(luò)文化殖民”[J];政工研究動態(tài);1999年17期

5 許文穎;;對網(wǎng)絡(luò)銀行控管之探討[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律評論;2011年01期

6 宋澤朋;;關(guān)于中國網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融的發(fā)展以及對中國社會的影響的探究[J];時代金融;2014年18期

7 徐亮;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融的法律規(guī)制——網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融立法構(gòu)想[J];河北法學;2005年08期

8 鄭伯順;網(wǎng)絡(luò)銀行有關(guān)法律問題探討及其對策[J];湖南經(jīng)濟管理干部學院學報;2003年01期

9 魏玲;;“東亞思想庫網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融合作會議”綜述[J];外交評論(外交學院學報);2007年02期

10 黎遠;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融被“剎車”?[J];新民周刊;2014年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 賴梁盟;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的特點及防控[A];當代法學論壇（2008年第2輯）[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 馮靜生;我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融發(fā)展存在的問題[N];經(jīng)濟參考報;2003年

2 實習生 郝爽;網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融能否挑戰(zhàn)傳統(tǒng)金融？[N];科技日報;2013年

3 記者 盧曉平;金融保險：不斷創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融服務(wù)模式[N];上海證券報;2013年

4 本報記者 王榮;前三季網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融釣魚詐騙激增[N];中國證券報;2013年

5 本報記者 高衛(wèi)民;網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融或成理財新方向[N];安徽經(jīng)濟報;2013年

6 本報記者 王冠　張月光 見習記者 黃斌;融入式電商金融？ 中行網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融戰(zhàn)略拆解[N];21世紀經(jīng)濟報道;2014年

7 馮靜生;網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融切忌增量不增質(zhì)[N];中國城鄉(xiāng)金融報;2003年

8 本報記者 程瑞華;網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融 再筑輝煌[N];金融時報;2002年

9 馮靜生;網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融存在五大問題[N];上海金融報;2003年

10 趙燕凌;網(wǎng)絡(luò)銀行：危險游戲講究安全玩法[N];廠長經(jīng)理日報;2001年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前5條

1 王雷;網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融的國際比較與借鑒[D];東北財經(jīng)大學;2003年

2 賴觀榮;網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟時代的投資選擇與管理[D];廈門大學;2001年

3 歐陽勇;網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代銀行中介功能研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2007年

4 王小燕;基于模糊評價的網(wǎng)絡(luò)銀行顧客信任度量方法研究[D];暨南大學;2011年

5 尹龍;網(wǎng)絡(luò)銀行與電子貨幣——網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融理論初探[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2002年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 吳蘇蘇;我國民間網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸風險防控研究[D];華南理工大學;2015年

2 石雅君;中國商業(yè)銀行網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融業(yè)務(wù)管理研究[D];華南理工大學;2015年

3 趙磊;網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融對荊州市農(nóng)村銀行業(yè)的影響分析[D];長江大學;2015年

4 林升;網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺法律問題研究[D];廣東財經(jīng)大學;2015年

5 于冰;我國小微企業(yè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)融資模式及創(chuàng)新案例研究[D];山東財經(jīng)大學;2015年

6 聶煒平;網(wǎng)絡(luò)互助融資平臺信用風險成因及實證研究[D];電子科技大學;2014年

7 駱朝偉;我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺監(jiān)管法律問題研究[D];西南科技大學;2015年

8 吳志堅;網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的擔保模式研究[D];華東政法大學;2015年

9 黃劍;論我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融的風險防控[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2014年

10 陳鳳;網(wǎng)絡(luò)金融準入的相關(guān)法律問題探究[D];中國社會科學院研究生院;2014年

，

本文編號：1890849