本文選題：企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度 + 效力　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度的合法完備以及是否能夠有效發(fā)揮其效力直接關(guān)乎著我國(guó)和諧勞動(dòng)關(guān)系的構(gòu)建和法治社會(huì)的形成。然而,在當(dāng)前的企業(yè)勞動(dòng)用工實(shí)踐中,由于企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度不合理甚至違法、違規(guī)現(xiàn)象引發(fā)的侵害勞動(dòng)者合法權(quán)益,從而引發(fā)的勞動(dòng)爭(zhēng)議案件已經(jīng)不勝枚舉,屢見(jiàn)不鮮。于是,企業(yè)勞動(dòng)規(guī)章制度中存在的問(wèn)題應(yīng)得到重視和及時(shí)解決。本文以企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度為研究對(duì)象,試圖對(duì)其效力完善提出一些建議,以期更好地維護(hù)雙方權(quán)益。除去引言與結(jié)論,文章主體分為四部分:第一部分,企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度適用過(guò)程中存在的主要問(wèn)題。這一部分主要是從搜集的與企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度適用有關(guān)的32則實(shí)務(wù)案例出發(fā),通過(guò)對(duì)案件判決結(jié)果和理由的仔細(xì)分析,剖析在企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度適用過(guò)程中存在的主要問(wèn)題。首先,是是否符合企業(yè)規(guī)章制度的有效性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題,主要是從其內(nèi)容和程序兩個(gè)部分來(lái)闡述。其次,分析了勞動(dòng)者嚴(yán)重違反企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度的“嚴(yán)重性”程度認(rèn)定問(wèn)題,司法機(jī)關(guān)關(guān)于“嚴(yán)重性”的不同衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也直接關(guān)系著案件的不同裁判結(jié)果;最后,談到了影響企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度效力發(fā)揮的證據(jù)問(wèn)題,這也是處理此類案件時(shí)不可忽視的又一重要問(wèn)題。第二部分,企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度的性質(zhì)探討和效力表現(xiàn)。經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)決定上層建筑,我國(guó)法律設(shè)計(jì)目的的初衷也離不開(kāi)促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。在此部分,首先分析了企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)上的原理,然后再以此為基礎(chǔ)去探討其法律上的效力基礎(chǔ),最后分析了其性質(zhì)歸屬;其次結(jié)合審判實(shí)踐闡述了我國(guó)企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度效力的主要表現(xiàn)。第三部分,對(duì)企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度效力有效要件的反思。由于我國(guó)勞動(dòng)基準(zhǔn)法律并沒(méi)有對(duì)欠缺合法性要件時(shí)的企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度的效力作出明確規(guī)定,然而從司法實(shí)踐中的勞動(dòng)糾紛來(lái)看,該問(wèn)題也應(yīng)得到及時(shí)解決。本部分首先對(duì)其合法性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了分析;然后對(duì)欠缺合法性要件時(shí)的企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度的效力進(jìn)行探討;最后剖析了當(dāng)前司法實(shí)踐中影響企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度效力發(fā)揮的主要原因。第四部分,提出完善我國(guó)企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章有效性的制度保障。本部分作為本文的落腳點(diǎn),主要是針對(duì)上述影響企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度效力發(fā)揮的主要問(wèn)題,同時(shí)汲取國(guó)外發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出完善我國(guó)企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章有效性的制度保障,主要包括增加制定事前審查備案程序;強(qiáng)化勞資雙方的平等協(xié)商機(jī)制;細(xì)化企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章實(shí)施規(guī)則;加強(qiáng)對(duì)企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)自主發(fā)展權(quán)的規(guī)制。
[Abstract]:The legal perfection of the internal rules and regulations of enterprises and whether they can effectively exert their effects are directly related to the construction of harmonious labor relations and the formation of a society ruled by law. However, in the current practice of labor and employment in enterprises, due to unreasonable or even illegal internal rules and regulations of the enterprise, violations of the legal rights and interests of workers caused by the phenomenon, thus the labor dispute cases have been numerous, common occurrence. Thus, the existing problems in the enterprise labor rules and regulations should be paid attention to and solved in time. Taking the internal rules and regulations of enterprises as the research object, this paper tries to put forward some suggestions on the perfection of their effectiveness in order to better safeguard the rights and interests of both sides. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, the main body of the article is divided into four parts: the first part, the main problems in the application of internal rules and regulations. This part is mainly from the collection of 32 practical cases related to the application of internal rules and regulations of the enterprise, through the careful analysis of the results and reasons of the case judgment, the main problems existing in the application of the internal rules and regulations of the enterprise are analyzed. First of all, whether it conforms to the validity standard of enterprise rules and regulations, mainly from its content and procedure two parts to elaborate. Secondly, the author analyzes the problem of the degree of "seriousness" of the serious violation of the internal rules and regulations of the enterprise, and the different standards of the judicial organ on the "seriousness" are also directly related to the different adjudication results of the case. This paper discusses the evidence that affects the effectiveness of internal rules and regulations, which is also an important problem that can not be ignored in dealing with this kind of cases. The second part, the nature of the internal rules and regulations and the effectiveness of the performance. The economic base determines the superstructure, and the original intention of the legal design in our country is to promote the development of economy. In this part, we first analyze the economic principles of the internal rules and regulations of the enterprise, and then discuss its legal validity basis on this basis, and finally analyze the nature of the attribution; Secondly, it expounds the main performance of the effectiveness of internal rules and regulations of Chinese enterprises combined with the trial practice. The third part, the reflection on the effective elements of the internal rules and regulations. Because the labor standard law of our country has not made the explicit stipulation on the validity of the internal rules and regulations of the enterprise when it lacks the legality elements, however, from the view of the labor dispute in the judicial practice, the problem should be solved in time. In this part, the author first analyzes the legitimacy standard, and then discusses the effectiveness of the internal rules and regulations in the absence of the elements of legitimacy. Finally, it analyzes the main reasons that affect the effectiveness of internal rules and regulations in the current judicial practice. In the fourth part, the author puts forward the system guarantee to perfect the effectiveness of internal rules and regulations in our country. This part, as the foothold of this paper, mainly aims at the above main problems which affect the effectiveness of the internal rules and regulations of enterprises, and at the same time, draws on the advanced experience of foreign developed countries, and puts forward the system guarantee to improve the effectiveness of internal rules and regulations in our country. It mainly includes establishing the procedure of prior examination and filing, strengthening the equal consultation mechanism between employers and employees, refining the internal rules and regulations of the enterprise, and strengthening the regulation of the right to independent development of enterprise management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.5;D922.291.91

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 張燁;;試論公司內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度的效力研究[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2013年21期

2 ;公司能以內(nèi)部規(guī)章解雇我嗎[J];新疆人大;2003年01期

3 ;內(nèi)部規(guī)章能作為處罰的依據(jù)嗎[J];民主與法制;2007年18期

4 談海圣;從內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度立法現(xiàn)狀看勞動(dòng)者權(quán)益保護(hù)[J];蘇州科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

5 李軍鋒;沈建峰;;法治視野的高校內(nèi)部規(guī)章及其效力[J];理論探索;2012年03期

6 彭鳳蓮;;高校內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度的制定與實(shí)施[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期

7 王鳳民 ,程紅梅;保護(hù)勞動(dòng)者合法權(quán)益是企業(yè)制定規(guī)章制度的基礎(chǔ)[J];中外企業(yè)文化;2005年08期

8 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 王杰;;企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度的法律問(wèn)題[A];第十四屆海峽兩岸關(guān)系研討會(huì)論文集[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 楊冬梅 中國(guó)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系學(xué)院教授;企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度必須符合法律要求[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

2 江蘇省泰興市人民檢察院 王菲;勞動(dòng)者權(quán)益保護(hù)視角下的企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章探討[N];大眾科技報(bào);2009年

3 本報(bào)評(píng)論員 郭振綱;內(nèi)部規(guī)章：勞資雙方的博弈之鏡[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

4 肖軍;關(guān)注企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

5 雷和平;清理內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度乃當(dāng)務(wù)之急[N];金融時(shí)報(bào);2004年

6 記者 畢式明 實(shí)習(xí)生 黃麗穎 通訊員 張麗春;合同期內(nèi)女工不得生仔？不！[N];南方日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

7 馬建銀;健全內(nèi)部規(guī)章 建設(shè)信用藥監(jiān)[N];中國(guó)醫(yī)藥報(bào);2005年

8 本報(bào)記者白青鋒 中國(guó)勞動(dòng)保障報(bào)記者韓智力;合法的內(nèi)部規(guī)章同樣有約束力[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

9 尤曦紅邋龔甬鈺;無(wú)錫濱湖審結(jié)“五元錢(qián)”官司[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

10 曾小慶;“家法”必須服從國(guó)法[N];中山日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 黎怡婧;企業(yè)內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度效力研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

2 蔡昆;用人單位內(nèi)部規(guī)章制度研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1848863