本文選題：殘骸 + 清除費用��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：2007年通過的《內(nèi)羅畢國際船舶殘骸清除公約》,時隔八年,終于在2015年4月14日開始生效。這是國際上第一個系統(tǒng)性調(diào)整船舶殘骸打撈法律問題的國際公約,這一公約的生效給國際上船舶殘骸打撈工作指明了方向,也給我國船舶殘骸打撈帶來了挑戰(zhàn)。《內(nèi)羅畢國際船舶殘骸清除公約》明確了對船舶殘骸定位、標記以及強制責(zé)任保險或其他經(jīng)濟擔(dān)保等制度,規(guī)定了船舶登記所有人對其登記所有的構(gòu)成危害的船舶殘骸負有打撈清除并承擔(dān)清除費用的責(zé)任。本文在對公約重點條款進行分析的基礎(chǔ)上,采用對比分析法,將我國相關(guān)制度與公約規(guī)定進行比較分析,重點論述船舶殘骸清除費用的法律問題,為實踐中船舶殘骸清除費用的實現(xiàn)提供理論支撐。本文共分為四個部分。第一部分首先明確船舶殘骸的范圍,然后采用具體問題具體分析的方法,分情況進行討論,對不同類別的船舶殘骸打撈方式分別界定船舶殘骸清除費用的性質(zhì)。第二部分分析承擔(dān)船舶殘骸清除費用的責(zé)任主體,只要明確了船舶殘骸清除費用的承擔(dān)者,就解決了在實踐中費用向誰索賠的問題。第三部分分析船舶殘骸清除費用是否屬于限制性債權(quán),這一點,我國的立法思路與公約不一致,然而是能否享受責(zé)任限制對船舶殘骸清除費用的實現(xiàn)有一定的影響。第四部分探討船舶殘骸清除費用的實現(xiàn)機制,實踐中最關(guān)心的問題就是船舶殘骸清除費用的實現(xiàn)。在借鑒公約的基礎(chǔ)上,完善我國相關(guān)機制,在理論上提出解決船舶殘骸清除費用問題的方法。本文采用理論與實踐相結(jié)合的方法,同時借鑒國際立法,為解決我國船舶殘骸清除費用的法律問題提出對策。
[Abstract]:The Nairobi Convention on the removal of wreckage, adopted in 2007, came into force on April 14, 2015, after eight years. This is the first international convention to systematically regulate the legal issue of the salvage of ship wreckage. The entry into force of this convention has pointed out the direction for the salvage of wreckage in the international community. The Nairobi Convention on the removal of wreckage clearly defines the systems for the positioning, marking, compulsory liability insurance or other economic guarantees of ship wreckage. The owner of the ship's register shall be responsible for the salvage and removal of all hazardous wreckage registered by the ship. Based on the analysis of the key articles of the Convention, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the relevant systems of our country and the provisions of the Convention by means of comparative analysis, and focuses on the legal issues of the cost of wreckage removal. It provides theoretical support for the realization of the cost of ship wreckage removal in practice. This paper is divided into four parts. In the first part, the scope of ship wreckage is defined, and then the method of concrete analysis is used to discuss the situation, and the nature of the cost of wreckage removal is defined respectively for different types of ship wreckage. The second part analyzes the main body responsible for the cost of wreckage removal. As long as the payer of the cost of wreckage removal is defined, the problem of who claims for the cost in practice will be solved. The third part analyzes whether the cost of wreckage removal is a restrictive claim, which is inconsistent with the legislation of our country. However, the limitation of liability has a certain impact on the realization of the cost of wreckage removal. In the fourth part, the realization mechanism of the cost of wreckage removal is discussed. The most concerned problem in practice is the realization of the cost of wreckage removal. On the basis of reference to the convention and perfecting the relevant mechanism of our country, this paper puts forward a method to solve the problem of the cost of wreckage removal in theory. By combining theory with practice and drawing lessons from international legislation, this paper puts forward some countermeasures to solve the legal problem of the cost of wreckage removal in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 史景利;;析海上殘骸清除之法律對策[J];重慶交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期

2 李波;趙月林;;淺論中國油污基金的建立(英文)[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報;2007年S2期

3 盧大平;代金寶;;淺談在我國建立沉船沉物強制打撈清除基金[J];中國海事;2007年11期

4 沈衛(wèi)東;周潔;呂斌;;水行政執(zhí)法中部分具體行政行為的法律性質(zhì)探析[J];江淮水利科技;2008年04期

5 初北平;論沉船打撈中貨物保險人的法律地位[J];中國海商法年刊;1999年00期

6 陳龍杰;劉先鳴;;中國油污基金制度的構(gòu)建模式[J];中國海商法年刊;2007年00期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 羅曉斌;沉船沉物打撈清除若干法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2004年

2 溫靖玉;中國海事賠償責(zé)任限制制度研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1799143