本文選題：股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán) + 制度價(jià)值�。� 參考：《海南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：關(guān)于股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)制度的相關(guān)問(wèn)題學(xué)術(shù)界一直爭(zhēng)議不斷,隨著新《公司法》司法解釋四(征求意見(jiàn)稿)的出臺(tái),其中第四部分用整一章內(nèi)容來(lái)規(guī)定了關(guān)于股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)的情形,新一輪的爭(zhēng)議也漸漸掀起。如對(duì)于侵害股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)的股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議的效力問(wèn)題,公司法司法解釋四(征求意見(jiàn)稿)直接規(guī)定了該情形下協(xié)議無(wú)效。對(duì)此,有的學(xué)者表示支持,有的學(xué)者則表示強(qiáng)烈的反對(duì)。筆者通過(guò)研讀該征求意見(jiàn)稿中規(guī)定的關(guān)于股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)的部分,以及不同學(xué)者的意見(jiàn),再加上研究分析歷年來(lái)司法實(shí)踐中的相關(guān)案例,得出了一個(gè)初步的議題,即對(duì)于股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)不管是在立法還是司法實(shí)踐中,都存在擴(kuò)大適用的趨勢(shì),對(duì)此我們應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行合理的限制。鑒于此,本文將展開(kāi)對(duì)股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)合理限制問(wèn)題的探討。全文由引言、五個(gè)章節(jié)以及結(jié)論,幾個(gè)部分構(gòu)成,五個(gè)章節(jié)的主要內(nèi)容如下:第一部分是關(guān)于股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)制度概述,主要從概念和相關(guān)規(guī)定,及制度本身價(jià)值去闡述,該章內(nèi)容的寫(xiě)作目的是為下文的展開(kāi)分析做鋪墊。第二部分主要是重點(diǎn)分析了我國(guó)關(guān)于股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)合理限制問(wèn)題的現(xiàn)狀,其中談到了會(huì)直接引發(fā)進(jìn)行合理限制思考的典型案例,然后歸納分析了審判實(shí)踐中常涉及到其他合理限制的例子,最后概括我國(guó)股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)合理限制的不足之處。第三部分主要介紹國(guó)外關(guān)于該制度合理限制的相關(guān)立法,以及對(duì)我國(guó)股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)合理限制有關(guān)規(guī)定的完善有何借鑒意義。第四部分寫(xiě)的是為何要對(duì)股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)進(jìn)行限制,筆者主要從理論和實(shí)踐兩個(gè)角度進(jìn)行了分析。第五部分主要是結(jié)合上文的分析,針對(duì)性的提出了幾條關(guān)于股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)合理限制規(guī)定的完善的措施。最后結(jié)論對(duì)全文進(jìn)行了總結(jié),以及闡明了本文寫(xiě)作的目的,主要是希望通過(guò)對(duì)本文的研究,能夠引起大家對(duì)此問(wèn)題的關(guān)注,進(jìn)而去不斷完善有關(guān)的規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:The academic circles have been disputing about the system of shareholders' preemption right. With the introduction of the fourth judicial interpretation of the new Company Law (draft for soliciting opinions),The fourth part uses the whole chapter to define the situation of shareholders' preemption right, and a new round of controversy is gradually set off.For example, as to the validity of the equity transfer agreement which infringes on the shareholders' preemptive right, the judicial interpretation of the company law (draft of soliciting opinions) directly stipulates that the agreement is invalid under this situation.To this, some scholars express support, some scholars express strong opposition.By studying the part of the draft on shareholders' preemptive right, and the opinions of different scholars, plus the research and analysis of relevant cases in judicial practice over the years, the author has come to a preliminary topic.That is to say, there is a tendency to expand the application of shareholders' preemptive right, whether in legislation or judicial practice, which we should restrict reasonably.In view of this, this paper will discuss the reasonable restriction of shareholders' preemption right.The full text is composed of introduction, five chapters and conclusions. The main contents of the five chapters are as follows: the first part is an overview of the system of shareholders' preemption rights, mainly from the concept and related provisions, and the value of the system itself.The purpose of this chapter is to lay the groundwork for the following analysis.The second part focuses on the analysis of the current situation of the reasonable restriction of shareholders' preemption right in China, in which the typical cases that directly lead to reasonable restriction thinking are discussed.Then it summarizes and analyzes the examples of other reasonable restrictions that are often involved in trial practice, and finally generalizes the shortcomings of reasonable restrictions on shareholders' preemption rights in China.The third part mainly introduces the relevant legislation about the reasonable restriction of this system in foreign countries, and how to use for reference for the perfection of the reasonable restriction of the shareholders' preemption right in our country.The fourth part is about why to restrict the shareholders' preemption right, the author mainly analyzes it from two angles: theory and practice.The fifth part mainly combines the above analysis, puts forward several measures to perfect the reasonable restriction of shareholders' preemption right.Finally, the conclusion summarizes the full text, and clarifies the purpose of this paper, mainly through the study of this paper, can arouse the attention of everyone to this issue, and then to constantly improve the relevant provisions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 蔣大興;;股東優(yōu)先購(gòu)買(mǎi)權(quán)行使中被忽略的價(jià)格形成機(jī)制[J];法學(xué);2012年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1762417