發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-15 09:11

  本文選題：德國(guó) + 一般事故保險(xiǎn)　； 參考：《東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：因果關(guān)系的問題一直是法學(xué)理論和實(shí)踐領(lǐng)域重要的問題,德國(guó)通過兩百多年的時(shí)間,在一般事故保險(xiǎn)和工傷事故保險(xiǎn)中分別確立了自成體系的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。在一般事故保險(xiǎn)中,德國(guó)實(shí)行"比例化"的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn);在工傷事故保險(xiǎn)中,實(shí)行"本質(zhì)條件"說。我國(guó)在事故保險(xiǎn)中尚沒有明確規(guī)定因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),造成了司法實(shí)踐的混亂局面。效仿德國(guó),應(yīng)確立有別于我國(guó)民法領(lǐng)域的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定體系,在一般事故保險(xiǎn)中實(shí)行"比例化"的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),在工傷事故保險(xiǎn)中實(shí)行"本質(zhì)條件"說的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:The problem of causality has always been an important problem in the field of legal theory and practice. Through more than 200 years, Germany has established its own standard of causation in general accident insurance and industrial accident insurance respectively.In general accident insurance, Germany carries out the criterion of "proportionality" causality, and in industrial accident insurance, the "essential condition" is applied.There is no definite criterion of causality in accident insurance in our country, which leads to confusion in judicial practice.Following the example of Germany, we should establish the system of causality identification different from that in the field of civil law in our country, implement the criterion of "proportionality" of causality in general accident insurance, and implement the criterion of "essential condition" in industrial accident insurance.
【作者單位】： 遼寧大學(xué)法學(xué)院;中共沈陽市委黨校基礎(chǔ)教研部;北京語言大學(xué)研究生院;
【基金】：中共中央黨校全國(guó)黨校系統(tǒng)重點(diǎn)調(diào)研課題資助項(xiàng)目(中校廳發(fā)[2017]39號(hào)96項(xiàng))
【分類號(hào)】：D951.6;DD912.28

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 楊秀朝;構(gòu)建我國(guó)因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定模式之探討[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2003年02期

2 劉燕;梁p煵，

本文編號(hào)：1753460