本文選題：歸入權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：股東　出處：《西南科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在所有權(quán)與控制權(quán)日漸分離的現(xiàn)代公司治理模式下,如何保證董事、監(jiān)事、高級(jí)管理人員等公司負(fù)責(zé)人的權(quán)力正當(dāng)行使是一個(gè)難題。股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)制度是有效約束公司負(fù)責(zé)人權(quán)力、保障公司利益的重要制度,理應(yīng)得到重視。股東可以基于共益權(quán),通過(guò)提起訴訟的方式代位行使公司歸入權(quán),從而維護(hù)公司利益。我國(guó)股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)制度尚不成熟,原告主體資格備受質(zhì)疑、被告范圍過(guò)于狹窄、前置程序適用混亂、訴訟費(fèi)用過(guò)高、舉證難、損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)和歸入權(quán)競(jìng)合等問(wèn)題難以在現(xiàn)有制度中得到妥善解決,需要借鑒國(guó)外現(xiàn)有制度對(duì)我國(guó)歸入權(quán)相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行完善。英國(guó)從股東提起派生訴訟的條件、股東派生訴訟程序規(guī)則、股東派生訴訟費(fèi)用承擔(dān)等方面對(duì)股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)制度進(jìn)行了完善;美國(guó)擴(kuò)大了股東代表公司利益提起派生訴訟的范圍、對(duì)當(dāng)事人資格進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)規(guī)定、設(shè)立約束機(jī)制以防止股東派生訴訟制度被濫用、為激勵(lì)股東提起合理的派生訴訟,對(duì)原告股東給予訴訟費(fèi)用補(bǔ)償;日本對(duì)股東派生訴訟制度通過(guò)專節(jié)予以詮釋、引入美國(guó)訴訟費(fèi)用補(bǔ)償制度、設(shè)置股東派生訴訟的前置程序。各國(guó)的股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)制度可供我國(guó)參考和借鑒。通過(guò)放寬對(duì)原告資格的限制、擴(kuò)大股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)被告的范圍、明確公司在股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)的地位等完善股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)訴訟當(dāng)事人制度;通過(guò)實(shí)行案件受理費(fèi)優(yōu)惠政策、實(shí)行訴訟費(fèi)用補(bǔ)償制度等構(gòu)建股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)訴訟激勵(lì)機(jī)制;通過(guò)細(xì)化股東代位行使歸入權(quán)訴訟的前置程序、確立訴訟費(fèi)用擔(dān)保制度等改進(jìn)股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)訴訟的約束機(jī)制。另外從確立法院在股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)訴訟中的地位、確定法院的既判力以及允許提起再審、損害賠償責(zé)任和歸入權(quán)競(jìng)合重疊適用等方面給予歸入權(quán)制度的完善以支持。
[Abstract]:How to ensure the directors and supervisors under the modern corporate governance mode, in which ownership and control are separated day by day, It is a difficult problem for senior managers and other company leaders to exercise their rights properly. The system of shareholder subrogation is an important system that effectively constrains the power of the responsible person of the company and protects the interests of the company. The shareholder can take the subrogation right of the company by way of litigation, so as to safeguard the interests of the company. The system of shareholder's subrogation of corporate subrogation right is not mature, and the qualification of the plaintiff subject is questioned. The scope of the defendant is too narrow, the application of the front procedure is chaotic, the litigation costs are too high, the proof is difficult, the claim for damages and the concurrence of the right of attribution are difficult to be properly solved in the existing system. It is necessary to use the existing system of foreign countries for reference to perfect the relevant system of right of ascription in our country. The system of shareholders' subrogation of corporate subrogation has been perfected, and the scope of shareholders' derivative litigation on behalf of the company has been expanded in the United States, and the qualification of the parties has been specified in detail. Set up the restraint mechanism to prevent the shareholder derivative litigation system from being abused, in order to encourage the shareholders to file the reasonable derivative lawsuit, give the lawsuit cost compensation to the plaintiff shareholder, Japan interprets the shareholder derivative action system through the special section. This paper introduces the compensation system of litigation costs in the United States and sets up the pre-procedure of shareholder derivative action. The system of shareholders' subrogation of corporate subrogation can be used for reference and reference by our country. To expand the scope of shareholder subrogation, to clarify the status of company subrogation in shareholder subrogation, to perfect the litigant system of shareholder subrogation, and to implement the preferential policy of accepting cases, To establish the incentive mechanism of shareholder subrogation in the litigation of the right of subrogation of shareholders, to establish the system of compensation for litigation expenses, to establish the incentive mechanism of litigation of the right of subrogation of shareholders, In addition, from establishing the position of the court in the litigation of the shareholder's subrogation, determining the res judicata of the court and allowing to file a retrial, the system of surety of litigation expenses and so on is established to improve the binding mechanism of the litigation of the right of subrogation of the shareholder to exercise the right of subrogation of the company. Liability for damages and overlapping application of the right of relegation support the perfection of the system of the right of ascription.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 陳冬生,鐘文春;對(duì)欠款人的到期債權(quán)我能否代位行使[J];農(nóng)村百事通;2001年15期

2 陳冬生,鐘文春;對(duì)欠款人的到期債權(quán) 我能否代位行使[J];農(nóng)村百事通;2001年08期

3 薛濤;林炳發(fā);;代位行使債權(quán)問(wèn)題探討[J];審計(jì)月刊;2011年08期

4 王國(guó)忠;趙淑華;;連續(xù)成立債權(quán)的代位行使[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

5 羅襄瓏;;代位行使訴訟權(quán)利追償債務(wù)合法嗎[J];鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)科技;2001年07期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 祁立民;侵害人身產(chǎn)生債權(quán)不得代位行使[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

2 羅襄瓏;代位行使訴訟權(quán)利，，追償債權(quán)合法嗎？[N];中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)報(bào);2001年

3 ;撫恤金求償權(quán)不能代位行使[N];山西經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 蔡碧原;股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)法律問(wèn)題研究[D];西南科技大學(xué);2017年

2 周巖;試論股東代位行使短線交易歸入權(quán)[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

3 劉傳;淺議股東代位行使公司歸入權(quán)[D];北京大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1687019