本文選題：缺陷產(chǎn)品召回　切入點(diǎn)：政府職責(zé)　出處：《天津師范大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：構(gòu)建缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度的目的在于保護(hù)消費(fèi)者的合法權(quán)益,該制度是消除因產(chǎn)品缺陷而致消費(fèi)者危害的一種有效途徑。缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度具有顯著的時(shí)代性特征,與以往的保護(hù)公民權(quán)利的私法相比,具有很大的差別。主要差別體現(xiàn)在缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度兼具公法與私法的特征,政府在此項(xiàng)制度的實(shí)施中充當(dāng)著重要的角色,在主動(dòng)召回的過(guò)程中,積極引導(dǎo)、鼓勵(lì)企業(yè)；在強(qiáng)制召回中則采取行政手段,強(qiáng)制企業(yè)對(duì)缺陷產(chǎn)品進(jìn)行召回,可以說(shuō)政府是此項(xiàng)制度的“靈魂”,貫穿在整個(gè)過(guò)程當(dāng)中,沒(méi)有政府的監(jiān)管,就沒(méi)有真正意義上的缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度。本文主要針對(duì)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回中的政府職責(zé)進(jìn)行研究,明確政府在缺陷產(chǎn)品中角色定位、明確各政府職能部門的具體職責(zé)分工,建立我國(guó)完善的缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度。論文共分為五個(gè)部分。第一部分分析了缺陷產(chǎn)品召回的法律關(guān)系,明確了缺陷產(chǎn)品召回法律關(guān)系中的各種主體的身份地位,即缺陷產(chǎn)品召回中的主體包括當(dāng)事人和關(guān)系人,一方當(dāng)事人是經(jīng)營(yíng)者,另一方是消費(fèi)者,關(guān)系人是政府。消費(fèi)者是法律關(guān)系中的權(quán)利主體,缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度設(shè)計(jì)的核心是保護(hù)消費(fèi)者權(quán)益。與權(quán)利主體相對(duì)應(yīng)的義務(wù)主體既包括經(jīng)營(yíng)者,也包括政府,消費(fèi)者權(quán)利的實(shí)現(xiàn)有賴于義務(wù)主體如實(shí)地履行義務(wù)。第二部分,論述了政府介入缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度的必要性,政府負(fù)有調(diào)控宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)合理發(fā)展和維護(hù)社會(huì)公共利益的責(zé)任,因此,其有義務(wù)對(duì)經(jīng)營(yíng)者的召回行為進(jìn)行監(jiān)管。第三部分,對(duì)政府在缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度中發(fā)揮的職責(zé)加以探究,說(shuō)明了政府在缺陷產(chǎn)品召回中的重要性,可以說(shuō)沒(méi)有政府的監(jiān)管,就沒(méi)有真正意義上的缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度。第四部分,對(duì)政府在缺陷產(chǎn)品召回中履行職責(zé)現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了剖析,指出了目前存在的問(wèn)題,即我國(guó)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回的范圍狹窄,政府職能部門分工不明確,政府缺乏對(duì)產(chǎn)品召回信息的處理機(jī)制等。第五部分,根據(jù)我國(guó)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回中的實(shí)際情況,提出了完善政府在缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度中履行職責(zé)的具體建議,即應(yīng)建立普遍性的缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度,應(yīng)構(gòu)建完善的信息處理機(jī)制,并應(yīng)對(duì)政府職能部門合理分工進(jìn)行完善。只有將政府的職責(zé)貫穿在缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度整個(gè)過(guò)程中,以此為契機(jī),才能建立一套適合我國(guó)國(guó)情的缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度。
[Abstract]:The purpose of constructing defective product recall system is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, and this system is an effective way to eliminate the harm caused by product defects. The main difference is that the recall system of defective products has the characteristics of public law and private law, and the government plays an important role in the implementation of this system. In the process of active recall, we should actively guide and encourage enterprises. In the process of compulsory recall, we can say that the government is the "soul" of this system and runs through the whole process by adopting administrative means to force enterprises to recall defective products. Without government supervision, there is no real defect product recall system. The thesis is divided into five parts. The first part analyzes the legal relationship of defective product recall. The identity status of various subjects in the legal relationship of defective product recall is clarified, that is, the main body of defective product recall includes the parties and the parties concerned, one party is the operator, the other is the consumer, The party concerned is the government. The consumer is the right subject in the legal relationship. The core of the defective product recall system design is to protect the rights and interests of the consumer. The realization of consumers' rights depends on the obligation subjects to fulfill their obligations truthfully. The second part discusses the necessity of government intervention in the recall system of defective products. The government is responsible for regulating and controlling the rational development of the macro economy and safeguarding the public interests of the society. Therefore, it has the obligation to supervise the managers' recall behavior. The third part explores the responsibility of the government in the defective product recall system, and explains the importance of the government in the defective product recall. It can be said that without government supervision, there will be no genuine defective product recall system. Part 4th analyzes the current situation of the government performing its duties in the recall of defective products, and points out the existing problems. That is, the scope of defective product recall in China is narrow, the division of labor between government functional departments is not clear, the government lacks the processing mechanism of product recall information, etc., according to the actual situation of defective product recall in our country, The paper puts forward some concrete suggestions to perfect the government's duty in the recall system of defective products, that is, to establish a universal recall system of defective products, and to construct a perfect information processing mechanism. Only when the responsibility of the government runs through the whole process of the defective product recall system, can we set up a set of defective product recall system suitable for the national conditions of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭毓楓;;完善我國(guó)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回法律制度研究[J];湖北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

2 王世好;;論我國(guó)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回法律制度的完善[J];河南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

3 田麗;;論我國(guó)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回成本控制[J];中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì);2008年07期

4 宿希強(qiáng);;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回步入常態(tài)化——關(guān)于兩則缺陷產(chǎn)品新聞事件的深層解讀[J];中國(guó)質(zhì)量萬(wàn)里行;2009年06期

5 易鵬;;我國(guó)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回法律制度立法之商榷——兼評(píng)《缺陷產(chǎn)品召回管理?xiàng)l例(草案)》第三條[J];廣東廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

6 趙江燕;;關(guān)于建立我國(guó)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回法律制度的思考[J];科技信息;2009年31期

7 趙樹(shù)文;王巖云;;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回及其立法分析[J];理論探索;2010年02期

8 成繼平;;論我國(guó)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回的立法模式[J];湖北汽車工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

9 栗陽(yáng);;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任視角下的缺陷產(chǎn)品召回法律制度[J];中國(guó)商貿(mào);2012年22期

10 王一鶴;;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回中的監(jiān)管者的職責(zé)分析[J];北京化工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 梁興國(guó);;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度與政府管理研究[A];2013年政府法制研究[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 ;中國(guó)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回條例有望明年出臺(tái)[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 記者 汪偉　見(jiàn)習(xí)記者 魏_g;制定缺陷產(chǎn)品召回法[N];天津日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

3 本報(bào)記者 顧克非;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回在考問(wèn)中延伸[N];消費(fèi)日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

4 記者 周芳　實(shí)習(xí)生 曹程 通訊員 秋琪 李偉;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回有了監(jiān)管[N];湖北日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

5 燕鏡伊;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回信息系統(tǒng) 讓消費(fèi)者投訴“有門”[N];中國(guó)國(guó)門時(shí)報(bào);2006年

6 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院院長(zhǎng)、教授 王利明;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回應(yīng)是企業(yè)的法定義務(wù)[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

7 本報(bào)記者 高亞蘭;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回立法 緊急提速[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2008年

8 本報(bào)記者 劉微;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回立法聚焦三大熱點(diǎn)[N];消費(fèi)日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

9 本報(bào)記者 韓樂(lè)悟;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回立法 欲樹(shù)汽車召回“標(biāo)竿”[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

10 張輝 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所;中國(guó)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回統(tǒng)一立法任重道遠(yuǎn)[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2010年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 代磊;企業(yè)缺陷產(chǎn)品召回敏捷管理研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 許f，

本文編號(hào)：1637174