本文選題：股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：股東利益　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán),即指公司股東基于其股東的資格在公司發(fā)行新股的時(shí)候,能夠優(yōu)先于其他股東按照其持股比例認(rèn)購新股的權(quán)利。股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)不同于一般股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓,與公司員工行使的優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)亦有不同。股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)使得股東的比例性利益得到了維護(hù),使現(xiàn)有股東免受發(fā)行新股后其表決權(quán)比例有所下降,并且賦予股東維護(hù)自身利益的權(quán)利,股東得以借此獲得新股價(jià)格與市價(jià)之間差價(jià)作為現(xiàn)實(shí)收益。因此,股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)具有共益權(quán)兼具自益權(quán)的功能。股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)分為抽象性股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)與具體性股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán),二者既有聯(lián)系又有區(qū)別,抽象性股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)為基礎(chǔ),具體性股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)由其產(chǎn)生,然而抽象性股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)又必須依賴于具體性股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)。對于抽象性股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)的性質(zhì)不存在爭議,但對于具體性股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)的性質(zhì)存在較大的爭議,主要爭議在于其是債權(quán)還是物權(quán)、形成權(quán)還是請求權(quán)。股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)往往會與公司的運(yùn)作效率相沖突,公司的融資效率會受到較大的影響。隨著社會的快速發(fā)展、經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的深入,公司的商事行為所產(chǎn)生的影響逐漸擴(kuò)大,往往會牽涉到社會公眾的利益。因此股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)所體現(xiàn)的利益沖突已不再是股東利益與公司運(yùn)作效率之間的沖突了,利益沖突更加多元化,對廣大股民以及社會投資決策者等社會公眾利益一方也會造成嚴(yán)重的影響。本文將股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)所體現(xiàn)的各項(xiàng)利益進(jìn)行分析,研究了股東利益與公司的運(yùn)作效率以及社會公眾利益三者之間應(yīng)當(dāng)怎樣平衡。對現(xiàn)有股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)法律制度的不足進(jìn)行整理、歸納,并分析了國外股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)法律制度,以一種創(chuàng)新的價(jià)值理念的引領(lǐng),對我國股東優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)法律制度的完善提出建議。
[Abstract]:Shareholder's prior subscription right means that the shareholders of a company, based on the qualification of their shareholders, can take precedence over the rights of other shareholders to subscribe for new shares according to their shareholding ratio when the company issues new shares. The prior subscription right of shareholders is different from the transfer of ordinary shares. It is also different from the preferential option exercised by the employees of the company. The shareholder's prior subscription rights protect the shareholders' proportional interests and reduce the voting ratio of existing shareholders after they are exempted from issuing new shares. And it gives shareholders the right to defend their own interests, through which shareholders can obtain the difference between the new share price and the market price as a real benefit. The shareholder's preferential subscription right has the function of co-beneficial right and self-beneficial right. The shareholder's prior subscription right is divided into abstract shareholder's preferential subscription right and concrete shareholder's preferential subscription right, both of which are related and different, and the abstract shareholder's preferential subscription right is based on the abstract shareholder's prior subscription right. However, the realization of abstract shareholder's preferential subscription right must depend on the specific shareholder's prior subscription right, and there is no dispute about the nature of abstract shareholder's preferential subscription right. However, there is a great dispute about the nature of the specific shareholders' preferential subscription right, the main dispute is whether it is the creditor's right or the real right, the forming right or the claim right, and the shareholder's prior subscription right often conflicts with the company's operational efficiency. With the rapid development of the society and the deepening of economic globalization, the influence of the commercial behavior of the company will be gradually expanded. As a result, the conflict of interest embodied in the shareholders' prior subscription rights is no longer the conflict between the shareholders' interests and the efficiency of the company's operation, and the conflicts of interest are more diversified. It will also have a serious impact on the interests of the majority of shareholders and social investment decision makers. This paper analyzes the various interests embodied in the shareholders' preferential subscription rights. This paper studies how to balance the interests of shareholders with the operating efficiency of the company and the social public interests. It collates and summarizes the shortcomings of the existing legal system of shareholders' preferential subscription rights, and analyzes the legal system of foreign shareholders' preferential subscription rights. With the guidance of an innovative value concept, the author puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the legal system of shareholders' preemption right in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王彥明;股東大會決議的無效與撤銷——基于德國股份法的研究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年04期

2 張新榮;試論“優(yōu)先購買權(quán)”及其法律保護(hù)[J];法學(xué);1989年09期

3 劉宏;;上市公司配股并非穩(wěn)賺不賠[J];大眾理財(cái)顧問;2010年04期

4 劉云升;先買權(quán)制度法律價(jià)值等諸問題的探討——兼論先買權(quán)制度在未來民法典上的定位[J];河北法學(xué);2000年05期

5 王彥明;;公司增資中股東新股認(rèn)購權(quán)排除制度研究——以德國股份法為研究視角[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

6 傅穹;孫秋楓;;新股優(yōu)先認(rèn)購權(quán)規(guī)則[J];南京大學(xué)法律評論;2004年02期

，

本文編號：1587774