本文關(guān)鍵詞： 設(shè)立中公司 民事責(zé)任 發(fā)起人　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)不斷的進(jìn)步和發(fā)展,公司在社會(huì)的發(fā)展過(guò)程中扮演者舉足輕重的地位。但是公司的設(shè)立是一個(gè)紛繁復(fù)雜的過(guò)程,需要符合相關(guān)法定條件和法定程序才能成為有獨(dú)立法人資格的公司。在公司的設(shè)立過(guò)程中會(huì)實(shí)施相應(yīng)的創(chuàng)設(shè)公司行為包括同第三人建立相關(guān)法律關(guān)系,這其中會(huì)涉及到發(fā)起人、設(shè)立中公司、成立后的公司以及相關(guān)第三人的利益。伴隨著這類活動(dòng)的日益復(fù)雜化和糾紛增多,為適應(yīng)商事活動(dòng)的發(fā)展,最高人民法院在二零一一年出臺(tái)了《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用中華人民共和國(guó)公司法若干規(guī)定(三)》對(duì)于糾紛的解決起到了一定的作用,但是在責(zé)任的分配上仍存在一定的模糊性.為了彌補(bǔ)法律上的缺陷和不明確有必要對(duì)此進(jìn)一步探討。筆者將在論述設(shè)立中公司相關(guān)基礎(chǔ)理論基礎(chǔ)之上結(jié)合國(guó)外的相關(guān)立法和司法實(shí)踐以及平衡不同利益主體之下對(duì)設(shè)立中公司責(zé)任承擔(dān)進(jìn)行分析和探討。本文除了引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)之外總共分為三個(gè)部分。第一部分是對(duì)設(shè)立中公司基本理論進(jìn)行分析探討,為下文設(shè)立中公司責(zé)任承擔(dān)提供依據(jù)。在這一部分主要對(duì)設(shè)立中公司的法律性質(zhì)、行為類型以及對(duì)相關(guān)責(zé)任主體關(guān)系進(jìn)行探討。第二部分區(qū)分合同類型對(duì)設(shè)立中公司責(zé)任承擔(dān)進(jìn)行分析和探討。依據(jù)發(fā)起人訂立合同的名義區(qū)分為以發(fā)起人自己、設(shè)立中公司以及擬成立公司名義結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外立法和司法實(shí)踐以及在平衡不同主體利益下分析相關(guān)擔(dān)責(zé)理論并提出責(zé)任承擔(dān)見(jiàn)解。第三部分是對(duì)完善設(shè)立中公司民事責(zé)任制度的相關(guān)建議。這部分包括對(duì)《公司法司法解釋三》存在的不足予以完善,在區(qū)分設(shè)立行為類型基礎(chǔ)之上明確公司設(shè)立成功時(shí)和設(shè)立失敗時(shí)的責(zé)任承擔(dān)。
[Abstract]:With the continuous progress and development of the society, the company plays an important role in the process of social development. But the establishment of the company is a complicated process. It is necessary to meet the relevant legal conditions and legal procedures in order to become a company with independent legal personality. In the process of establishing a company, the corresponding acts of creating a company include establishing a relevant legal relationship with a third party, which will involve the initiator, The interests of established companies, established companies and related third parties. With the increasing complexity of such activities and the increase in disputes, in order to adapt to the development of commercial activities, In 2011, the Supreme people's Court promulgated the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (3), which played a certain role in the settlement of disputes. However, there is still some ambiguity in the distribution of responsibility. In order to make up for the defects in law and lack of clarity, it is necessary to further explore this issue. The author will combine the relevant basic theories of the established company with foreign ones. The related legislation and judicial practice and the balance of different stakeholders to the responsibility of the company under the establishment of the analysis and discussion. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into a total of three parts. The first part is the establishment of the company. The basic theory is analyzed and discussed. To provide the basis for the liability of the established company below. In this part, the legal nature of the company being established, The second part analyzes and discusses the responsibility of the company in the process of establishment. According to the name of the initiator to conclude the contract, it is divided into the initiator himself. The establishment of the company and the proposed establishment of the name of the company combined with domestic and foreign legislative and judicial practice and under the balance of the interests of different subjects to analyze the related accountability theory and put forward the responsibility. The third part is to perfect the establishment of the people of the company. This part includes the deficiencies of the Judicial interpretation of Company Law, On the basis of distinguishing the types of establishing behavior, it is clear that the responsibility of the successful establishment and the failure of the establishment of the company.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 王麗質(zhì);;淺析設(shè)立中公司的合同效力及民事責(zé)任承擔(dān)[J];法制與社會(huì);2017年09期

2 張前東;;淺析發(fā)起人在公司設(shè)立階段的法律地位[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2013年04期

3 許超;;淺析有限責(zé)任公司設(shè)立中公司行為在實(shí)踐中的體現(xiàn)和處理[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2011年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張樂(lè)新;公司自治視野下有限公司設(shè)立法律規(guī)則的變遷與重構(gòu)[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 郭露;論設(shè)立中公司的責(zé)任歸屬[D];蘇州大學(xué);2014年

2 白江紅;論設(shè)立中公司的若干法律問(wèn)題[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2014年

3 臧磊;公司發(fā)起人民事義務(wù)與責(zé)任研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2013年

4 范穎;設(shè)立中公司法律制度的研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

5 馮丹;論公司設(shè)立失敗中債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

6 孫一亮;論設(shè)立中公司民事合同責(zé)任[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1513522