【摘要】：未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移制度是監(jiān)護(hù)制度的重要組成部分,尤其是在法定代理人一方死亡或喪失監(jiān)護(hù)能力的前提下,該制度對(duì)調(diào)整和規(guī)范父母子女關(guān)系和家族關(guān)系發(fā)揮著積極作用,若不加以正確引導(dǎo)規(guī)范,將導(dǎo)致未成年子女的權(quán)益受損。監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)移又名委托監(jiān)護(hù),其與監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的設(shè)置是兩個(gè)完全不同的概念。我國現(xiàn)行民法制度中對(duì)未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)移規(guī)定相當(dāng)簡(jiǎn)單,立法的不足導(dǎo)致司法、守法的困惑。因此,本文以實(shí)際案例為基點(diǎn),討論在未成年人的一方法定代理人死亡或喪失監(jiān)護(hù)能力的情形下,另一方監(jiān)護(hù)人與第二順位的法定監(jiān)護(hù)人達(dá)成的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移協(xié)議,對(duì)該協(xié)議的正確認(rèn)定,并就我國未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)協(xié)議轉(zhuǎn)移存在的不足進(jìn)行探討,結(jié)合國外相關(guān)規(guī)定,針對(duì)實(shí)際案件提出相關(guān)完善建議。 本文除引言和結(jié)語外,分為五個(gè)部分,共約16688字。 第一部分據(jù)以研究的案例。該部分主要介紹了以本文研究的監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)協(xié)議轉(zhuǎn)移制度為核心的案件,從該案的案由、案件來源、原審法院判決內(nèi)容三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了闡述。 第二部分案件焦點(diǎn)。該部分主要介紹了該案在實(shí)際審判中當(dāng)事人的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn),引出本文探討的相關(guān)法律問題。 第三部分爭(zhēng)議與分歧意見。該部分主要闡述了與案件焦點(diǎn)相關(guān)的四個(gè)法律問題,即案由確定、監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)協(xié)議轉(zhuǎn)移的認(rèn)定、第二監(jiān)護(hù)人的權(quán)利和轉(zhuǎn)移協(xié)議的效力,分別介紹了案件審理過程中合議庭成員在這四個(gè)法律問題上產(chǎn)生的不同意見和作者觀點(diǎn)。 第四部分從本案看我國未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)協(xié)議轉(zhuǎn)移的立法缺陷及完善建議。該部分主要從五個(gè)方面進(jìn)行闡述,針對(duì)我國關(guān)于未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)協(xié)議轉(zhuǎn)移的基本內(nèi)容,結(jié)合國外關(guān)于該制度的立法情況,指出我國未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)協(xié)議轉(zhuǎn)移的缺陷,最后提出關(guān)于未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)協(xié)議轉(zhuǎn)移的完善意見。同時(shí)闡述了在監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移的協(xié)議中進(jìn)行監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)的設(shè)置問題,法院確認(rèn)其監(jiān)護(hù)人身份的具體條件。 第五部分研究結(jié)論。該部分主要分兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行介紹,一是針對(duì)該案的研究結(jié)論,評(píng)議原審法院判決;二是作者提出自己的判決主張。
[Abstract]:The system of the custody transfer of the minor is an important part of the guardianship system, especially on the premise of the death or the loss of the guardianship ability of the legal representative, the system plays an active role in adjusting and regulating the relationship between the parent and the family and the family relationship. The rights and interests of minor children will be damaged. The transfer of custody is also known as the custody of the custody, and the setting of custody is two completely different concepts. In our current civil law system, the transfer of the custody of the minors is quite simple, and the lack of the legislation leads to the confusion of the judicial and the law-abiding. Therefore, in the case of the actual case as the base point, the custody transfer agreement between the guardian of the other party and the legal guardian of the second order is discussed in the case of the death or the loss of the monitoring capacity of one of the legal representatives of the minor, and the correct determination of the agreement is made. In addition, the author probes into the shortcomings of the transfer of the custody agreement of the minors in our country, and puts forward some suggestions on the improvement of the actual cases in the light of the relevant regulations of the foreign countries. In addition to the introduction and the conclusion, this paper is divided into five parts, about 16688. The first part is based on the study This part mainly introduces the case of the transfer system of the custody agreement, which is studied in this paper, from the case of the case, the origin of the case and the judgment of the court of the original instance. The second part. This part mainly introduces the focal point of the case in the actual trial, and leads out the phase of this paper. The issue of the closure of the law. Part III The main part of this part is the four legal issues related to the focus of the case, namely, the determination of the case, the determination of the transfer of the custody agreement, the rights of the second guardian and the right of the second guardian. The effect of the transfer agreement is the difference between the members of the collegial panel in the four legal issues. Opinion and author's point of view. The fourth part looks at the transfer of the custody agreement of the minors in our country from the present case. On the basis of five aspects, this part expounds the basic contents of the transfer of the custody agreement of the minors, and points out the supervision of the minors in our country in the light of the foreign legislation of the system. The defect of the transfer of the right to protect the rights, and finally put forward the custody of the minor. Perfect view of the transfer of the agreement. The issue of the establishment of the custody transfer in the custody transfer agreement is also stated, and the court has confirmed its supervision specific conditions for the identity of the person The fifth part is the conclusion of the fifth part. The part is mainly introduced in two aspects, one is the conclusion of the case and the judgment of the original instance court, and the other is the second one.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱凡;現(xiàn)代監(jiān)護(hù)法發(fā)展趨勢(shì)及熱點(diǎn)問題比較研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

2 江中帆;;婆媳之爭(zhēng):12萬元財(cái)產(chǎn)監(jiān)護(hù)權(quán)歸誰?[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(上半月);2007年01期

3 羅麗華,丁峰;論我國監(jiān)護(hù)制度之不足與完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年02期

4 佟麗華;對(duì)未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的立法思考與建議[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年03期

5 孟勒國,蔣慧,黃鵬;論監(jiān)護(hù)的性質(zhì)及監(jiān)護(hù)人的權(quán)益[J];法學(xué);1996年11期

6 汪金蘭;未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)問題探析[J];法學(xué);1997年08期

7 李玉華,楊軍生;我國未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的反思與重構(gòu)[J];青少年犯罪問題;2004年05期

8 范君;對(duì)完善我國監(jiān)護(hù)制度的思考[J];前沿;1997年06期

9 阿榮;完善我國監(jiān)護(hù)制度的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];前沿;2003年07期

10 王雪晴,葉風(fēng)雷;我國未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度存在的問題及完善[J];新疆廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2483092