【摘要】：民法基本原則是民事法律制度的根本指導(dǎo)思想，其效力貫穿于所有民事活動的始終。民法基本原則具有克服成文法的局限性、彌補法律滯后性的功能。在司法實踐中，直接適用民法基本原則判處案件的比例有所提高，而這其中“公序良俗”原則的直接適用也成為了一個社會關(guān)注的熱點。公序良俗是民法體系中重要的一項原則，，在大陸法系中占有重要地位。但我國民法體系中并沒有對公序良俗進行明確的界定，致使這一概念的定位、考量、適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)都存在較大差異，進而造成在司法實踐中的不確定性。公序良俗的實質(zhì)是對當(dāng)事人意識自治的限制，在我國司法實踐中，該限制集中體現(xiàn)在遺贈領(lǐng)域，如瀘州遺贈案、廣西二奶案等，最終目的是確定遺贈行為的效力。這類案件與婚姻法、繼承法相關(guān)法律存在交織，適用公序良俗限定使當(dāng)事人自治無效的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、依據(jù)、尺度應(yīng)如何把握？目前尚未有一個明確的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，完全靠法官的自由裁量，這使得同案不同判的現(xiàn)象比較普遍。筆者力圖通過案例對比分析，從學(xué)理及實踐角度對公序良俗在遺贈糾紛中的裁量問題進行分析，旨在尋求一種在遺贈案件中對公序良俗限定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的界定或者一種審理思路，使該原則的適用更加理性合理，具有相對的操作性。
[Abstract]:The basic principle of civil law is the basic guiding ideology of civil law system, and its effect runs through all civil activities. The basic principles of civil law have the function of overcoming the limitation of statutory law and making up for the lag of law. In judicial practice, the proportion of cases directly applied to the basic principles of civil law has been increased, and the direct application of the principle of "public order and good custom" has become a hot spot of social concern. Public order and good custom is an important principle in the civil law system and plays an important role in the civil law system. However, there is no clear definition of public order and good custom in the civil law system of our country, which leads to great differences in the orientation, consideration and applicable standards of this concept, which leads to uncertainty in judicial practice. The essence of public order and good custom is to restrict the party's consciousness autonomy. In the judicial practice of our country, the restriction is concentrated in the field of bequest, such as Luzhou bequest case, Guangxi second wife case and so on, and the ultimate purpose is to determine the effect of bequest behavior. This kind of case is intertwined with the marriage law and the law of inheritance. How should we grasp the criterion of applying public order and good custom to limit the invalidation of party autonomy? At present, there is no clear standard, which depends entirely on the discretion of the judge, which makes the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case more common. Through the comparative analysis of cases, the author tries to analyze the discretion of public order and good custom in legacy disputes from the point of view of theory and practice, in order to seek a definition of the standard of public order and good custom in legacy cases or a way to try it. Make the application of this principle more rational and reasonable, have relative operability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 梁興國;;從判例、判例法到案例指導(dǎo)制度——“判例是如何形成的?”理論研討會綜述[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年06期

2 胡呂銀;法律行為內(nèi)容的限制與違反善良風(fēng)俗的適用——對一起遺囑繼承案的法理剖析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2002年03期

3 何海波;;何以合法? 對“二奶繼承案”的追問[J];中外法學(xué);2009年03期

4 陳桂香;;淺談夫妻忠實義務(wù)[J];黑龍江畜牧獸醫(yī)職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年01期

5 王歌雅;;夫妻忠誠協(xié)議:價值認知與效力判斷[J];政法論叢;2009年05期

6 梁慧星;市場經(jīng)濟與公序良俗原則[J];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院學(xué)報;1993年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 闞凱;非婚同居的法律問題研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：2262193