【摘要】：婚姻,是為當(dāng)時(shí)社會(huì)制度所確認(rèn)的、男女兩性互為配偶的結(jié)合。中國(guó)經(jīng)歷了兩千多年的封建社會(huì),受“法不入家門(mén)”、“家丑不可外揚(yáng)”、“以和為貴”等傳統(tǒng)思想的影響,很多人不愿直面婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為,他們往往不愿放棄家庭的和睦而采用訴訟的手段來(lái)維護(hù)自己的權(quán)益,認(rèn)為婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為只是夫妻之間的一種私事,因此在發(fā)生婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為時(shí)侵權(quán)人便會(huì)順理成章地逃避法律的制裁。隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,社會(huì)的進(jìn)步,公民思想有了很大的轉(zhuǎn)變,并沒(méi)有再像從前一樣一味的束縛于舊觀念、舊思想傳統(tǒng)之中,加上改革開(kāi)放帶來(lái)的新事物,讓我們有機(jī)會(huì)接觸到西方的文化。這讓越來(lái)越多的已婚婦女已經(jīng)意識(shí)到自己的權(quán)利,從而拿起法律的武器去保護(hù)自己的權(quán)益。遺憾的是我國(guó)現(xiàn)行《婚姻法》在追究婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為的民事責(zé)任時(shí),存在著嚴(yán)重的缺陷,不能很好的對(duì)受害人進(jìn)行有效的司法救濟(jì),也不能起到遏制夫妻侵權(quán)行為的目的。學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任的呼聲也越來(lái)越高,分歧矛盾也層出不窮。婚內(nèi)家庭關(guān)系是最基本的社會(huì)關(guān)系,婚姻關(guān)系的穩(wěn)定關(guān)系到社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定,婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為如果得不到有效地遏制勢(shì)必會(huì)影響到婚姻家庭的穩(wěn)定,因此構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度是我國(guó)社會(huì)發(fā)展和構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的內(nèi)在需求。文章從婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)是否承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任以及構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任的理論依據(jù)和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義出發(fā),審視了構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度所存在的障礙因素,圍繞著是否構(gòu)成婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)以及侵權(quán)責(zé)任承擔(dān)問(wèn)題展開(kāi)討論,并提出了排除障礙的相應(yīng)法律對(duì)策,從而肯定了構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度的可行性和必然性。本文在寫(xiě)作方法上意在通過(guò)以我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法為依據(jù),借鑒世界其他國(guó)家和地區(qū)的立法、司法經(jīng)驗(yàn),以民法、婚姻法、民事權(quán)利法律制度等作為切入點(diǎn)對(duì)婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度構(gòu)建進(jìn)行了深入探討,以理論和實(shí)踐相結(jié)合為基本研究方法,輔之以歷史分析法、目的分析方法等研究方法,把實(shí)證和規(guī)范相結(jié)合。 全文除了引言和結(jié)束語(yǔ)之外,共分為三部分： 第一部分婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定。本章主要對(duì)婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)的基本問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了論述,從婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)的概念入手,闡述了婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)的特點(diǎn)、構(gòu)成要件和具體表現(xiàn)形式,把一般侵權(quán)行為和婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析,并對(duì)婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為的分類(lèi)以及幾種典型的婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為進(jìn)行了探討,以便更好地理解什么是婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為,使今后對(duì)婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為作出正確的判斷,更好地保障婚姻當(dāng)事人的權(quán)益。 第二部分構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任的可行性和制約因素。本部分結(jié)合我國(guó)民事責(zé)任制度的立法現(xiàn)狀對(duì)構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任的可行性進(jìn)行分析,指出我國(guó)在構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度方面是有一定理論依據(jù)和法律依據(jù),從而肯定了構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度的可行性。同時(shí)指出了在構(gòu)建過(guò)程中學(xué)術(shù)界和實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的或者可能出現(xiàn)的阻礙婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度構(gòu)建的障礙因素,并對(duì)此進(jìn)行全面分析�？梢钥闯�,構(gòu)建我國(guó)婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度勢(shì)在必行。 第三部分婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度的構(gòu)建。本部分首先闡述了構(gòu)建婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度的意義,從而肯定了婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度在立法中的地位不容忽視,婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度的確立對(duì)婚姻家庭立法的完善有著舉足輕重的作用。文章最后結(jié)合我國(guó)實(shí)際情況,針對(duì)本文第二部分所提到的可能出現(xiàn)的障礙因素提出了有針對(duì)性的立法對(duì)策,可以有效排除存在的問(wèn)題,對(duì)構(gòu)建我國(guó)婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度起到的積極的作用。
[Abstract]:Marriage was a marriage affirmed by the social system at that time, in which men and women were married to each other. After more than 2000 years of feudal society in China, many people were reluctant to face up to marital infringement because of the influence of traditional ideas such as "law does not enter the family", "family ugliness should not be publicized", "harmony is the most precious" and so on. With the development of our economy and the progress of our society, the citizen's thought has changed greatly, and has not changed as before. Restricted by old ideas, old ideological traditions, and new things brought about by reform and opening up, we have the opportunity to come into contact with Western culture. This has made more and more married women aware of their rights and thus take up the legal weapon to protect their rights and interests. There are serious defects in the civil liability of acts, which can not provide effective judicial relief to the victims, nor can it serve the purpose of curbing marital infringement. The stability of marital relationship is related to the stability of society. If the marital infringement can not be effectively curbed, it will affect the stability of marriage and family. Therefore, the construction of civil liability system for marital infringement is the internal demand of social development and the construction of a harmonious society. Starting from the theoretical basis and practical significance of civil liability for rights, this paper examines the obstacles in the construction of civil liability for marital infringement, discusses whether it constitutes marital infringement and the problem of liability for infringement, and puts forward corresponding legal countermeasures to remove the obstacles, thus affirming the establishment of civil liability for marital infringement. Feasibility and inevitability. This paper intends to make a thorough discussion on the construction of civil liability system for marital infringement by taking the current legislation of our country as the basis, drawing on the legislative and judicial experience of other countries and regions in the world, taking civil law, marriage law, civil rights legal system as the breakthrough point, and combining theory with practice as the basis. Basic research methods, supplemented by historical analysis, purpose analysis and other research methods, combine empirical and normative methods.
Apart from the introduction and concluding remarks, the article is divided into three parts.
The first part is the determination of marital infringement. This chapter mainly discusses the basic problems of marital infringement. Starting from the concept of marital infringement, it expounds the characteristics, constitutive requirements and specific manifestations of marital infringement. It makes a comparative analysis of general infringement and marital infringement, and classifies marital infringement and several kinds of infringement. Typical marital infringement is discussed in order to better understand what is marital infringement, so as to make a correct judgment on marital infringement in the future and better protect the rights and interests of marital parties.
The second part is about the feasibility and restrictive factors of constructing civil liability for infringement in marriage.This part analyzes the feasibility of constructing civil liability for infringement in marriage in light of the legislative status quo of civil liability system in China,and points out that there are certain theoretical and legal basis for constructing civil liability system for infringement in marriage in China. At the same time, it points out the obstacles that appear in the academic circles and practice or may appear in the process of building the civil liability system of infringement in marriage, and makes a comprehensive analysis of them. It can be seen that it is imperative to establish the civil liability system of infringement in marriage in China.
The third part is the construction of the civil liability system of infringement in marriage.This part firstly expounds the significance of constructing the civil liability system of infringement in marriage,thus affirming that the status of civil liability system of infringement in marriage can not be ignored in legislation,and the establishment of civil liability system of infringement in marriage plays an important role in the perfection of marriage and family legislation. In the end, according to the actual situation of our country, the article puts forward some legislative countermeasures against the possible obstacles mentioned in the second part of this article, which can effectively eliminate the existing problems and play a positive role in constructing the civil liability system of marital infringement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 楊立新;論侵害配偶權(quán)的精神損害賠償責(zé)任[J];法學(xué);2002年07期

2 蔡文強(qiáng);;試論婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)損害賠償[J];中共南昌市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

3 陳秋玲;;論我國(guó)婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)賠償制度的建立[J];衡陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

4 馮愷;分居制度與配偶權(quán)關(guān)系探析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2001年04期

5 陳葦;完善我國(guó)夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制的立法構(gòu)想[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2000年01期

6 于東輝;離婚損害賠償制度研究[J];政法論叢;2002年03期

7 姜虹;夫妻侵權(quán)責(zé)任探微[J];政法論壇;2003年01期

8 焦少林;;論建立夫妻間侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2006年05期

9 杜江涌;婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2005年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2198217