論探望權(quán)的司法判定
本文選題:探望權(quán) + 中止; 參考:《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文
【摘要】:近年來(lái),離婚案件日益增多,涉及探望權(quán)糾紛的案件數(shù)量隨之漸長(zhǎng)。由于《中華人民共和國(guó)婚姻法》對(duì)探望權(quán)的規(guī)定不夠具體和完善,導(dǎo)致實(shí)踐中探望權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)出現(xiàn)諸多困難。本文通過(guò)一個(gè)典型案例,分析探望權(quán)制度在實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,對(duì)比域外先進(jìn)的立法及司法經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)探望權(quán)進(jìn)行分析,為探望權(quán)之司法判定及未來(lái)立法提供幾點(diǎn)參考意見(jiàn)。主要包括以下內(nèi)容:引言部分,通過(guò)李某甲與李某乙探望權(quán)糾紛一案,引出探望權(quán)制度在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題,進(jìn)行相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)梳理,梳理出當(dāng)前的研究現(xiàn)狀,分析該問(wèn)題的研究意義和價(jià)值。第一部分,探望權(quán)的基本理論認(rèn)知。從應(yīng)然層面論述探望權(quán)所涉及到的基本理論知識(shí),主要包括探望權(quán)的概念和特征、探望權(quán)的性質(zhì)、探望權(quán)行使應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循的原則、探望權(quán)的功能和意義。第二部分,分析我國(guó)探望權(quán)運(yùn)行之現(xiàn)狀。從實(shí)然層面論述我國(guó)探望權(quán)立法現(xiàn)狀、實(shí)踐運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀存在的不足。一是中止情形不明確,二是行使方式不具體,三是探望權(quán)保障制度的缺乏。第三部分,域外探望權(quán)立法情況之考察。比較分析域外先進(jìn)的立法及司法經(jīng)驗(yàn),分別對(duì)探望權(quán)的限制、探望權(quán)的行使、探望權(quán)的制度保障三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行比較分析,以冀取人之長(zhǎng)補(bǔ)己之短。如美國(guó)的變更監(jiān)護(hù)制度、精神損害賠償制度,法國(guó)的“探望中心”的建立,等等。第四部分,完善探望權(quán)司法判定之路徑分析。首先,探望權(quán)的中止,可借鑒臺(tái)灣列舉式立法,結(jié)合概括性立法加以完善。其次,探望權(quán)行使方式,可借鑒美國(guó)“以子女為中心的親職時(shí)間指南”,探望方式的確定應(yīng)考慮會(huì)面、網(wǎng)上視頻聊天、信件來(lái)往等多種方式并存,探望時(shí)間的確定應(yīng)關(guān)注寒暑假、春節(jié)、生日等特殊日子,子女年齡還應(yīng)當(dāng)成為確定探望權(quán)行使方式的考量因素。再次,探望權(quán)之保障,可通過(guò)加強(qiáng)疏導(dǎo)教育、引入變更監(jiān)護(hù)制度、精神損害賠償制度、完善第三方協(xié)助機(jī)制、增加探望權(quán)義務(wù)性規(guī)定等措施來(lái)完善。最后,回歸案例,對(duì)該案例在現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)定下的處理作出分析,并提出完善建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, divorce cases are increasing, and the number of cases involving visitation right disputes is growing. Because the stipulation of visitation right in the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China is not specific and perfect, there are many difficulties in the realization of visitation right in practice. Through a typical case, this paper analyzes the problems in the practice of visitation right system, compares the advanced legislation and judicial experience, analyzes visitation right, and provides some references for the judicial judgment and future legislation of visitation right. Mainly includes the following content: introduction part, through Li Mou Jia and Li Mou B visitation right dispute case, leads to several problems that the visitation right system appears in our country judicial practice, carries on the related literature combing, combs out the present research present situation. The research significance and value of this problem are analyzed. The first part, the basic theory cognition of visitation right. This paper discusses the basic theoretical knowledge involved in visitation right from the aspect of necessity, including the concept and characteristics of visitation right, the nature of visitation right, the principles to be followed in the exercise of visitation right, and the function and significance of visitation right. The second part, analyzes the present situation of visitation right in our country. This paper discusses the status quo of visitation right legislation and the deficiency of practice operation from the aspect of reality. One is the suspension is unclear, the other is the lack of specific ways of exercising, and the lack of the visitation right guarantee system. The third part is the investigation of the legislation of extraterritorial visitation right. This paper compares and analyzes the advanced legislation and judicial experience of foreign countries, and makes a comparative analysis of the restriction of visitation right, the exercise of visitation right and the system guarantee of visitation right in order to make up for the weakness of others. Such as the change of guardianship system in the United States, the system of compensation for moral damage, the establishment of visiting centres in France, and so on. The fourth part, perfect the path analysis of the judicial judgment of visitation right. First of all, the suspension of visitation rights can be improved by Taiwan's enumeration legislation and general legislation. Secondly, the exercise of visitation rights can be used for reference in the United States "child-centered parental time guide," the determination of visiting methods should consider meeting, online video chat, correspondence and other means co-exist. The determination of visiting time should pay attention to the special days such as winter and summer vacation, Spring Festival, birthday and so on. The age of children should also be the consideration factor of determining the way of exercising visitation right. Thirdly, the guarantee of visitation right can be improved by strengthening the guidance education, introducing the system of changing guardianship, the system of compensation for mental damage, perfecting the mechanism of third party assistance, increasing the stipulation of obligation of visitation right and so on. Finally, return to the case, the case under the existing legal provisions of the analysis, and put forward suggestions for improvement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D923.9
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張迎秀;簡(jiǎn)析離婚父母的探望權(quán)[J];政法論叢;2002年05期
2 楊俊英;試析探望權(quán)[J];遼寧師專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期
3 黃新,張冰;國(guó)外、域外探望權(quán)制度比較——兼論我國(guó)探望權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建[J];山東行政學(xué)院山東省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期
4 張莉,王仰光;“探望權(quán)”若干問(wèn)題的研究[J];番禺職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期
5 王麗萍;中日探望權(quán)制度研究[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期
6 劉艷;探望權(quán)的執(zhí)行及其立法建議[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期
7 吳國(guó)平;離婚后父母對(duì)子女的探望權(quán)問(wèn)題探析[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期
8 姜素紅;論我國(guó)探望權(quán)法律制度及其完善[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2004年06期
9 戴曉青,王紅梅;和諧社會(huì)建設(shè)中探望權(quán)制度的完善[J];市場(chǎng)周刊(管理探索);2005年04期
10 陳紅;芻議探望權(quán)案件的執(zhí)行[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年10期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條
1 劉淑芬;方硯;;誰(shuí)比誰(shuí)親?權(quán)利誰(shuí)屬?——從一起探望權(quán)判例說(shuō)起[A];全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)叢書(shū)——英美法系及其對(duì)中國(guó)的影響[C];2008年
2 羅張進(jìn);;試論探望權(quán)案件的執(zhí)行[A];中國(guó)管理科學(xué)文獻(xiàn)[C];2008年
3 付曉斌;;隔代親情的法律保護(hù)——論隔代探望權(quán)的確立和制度設(shè)置[A];探索社會(huì)主義司法規(guī)律與完善民商事法律制度研究——全國(guó)法院第23屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募ㄏ拢C];2011年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 占翔 詹菊生;探望權(quán) 間接撫養(yǎng)子女者的法定權(quán)利[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2001年
2 武莉蓉 姜婷婷 周小明;探望權(quán)淺析[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2005年
3 陳洪斌;探望權(quán)在審判實(shí)踐中的具體適用[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2002年
4 陳新華 王恩飛;對(duì)探望權(quán)案件執(zhí)行的思考[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2004年
5 本報(bào)記者 荊 龍 張曉敏;探望權(quán):如何體現(xiàn)孩子意志[N];人民法院報(bào);2004年
6 張繼衡邋劉常儉;丈夫不讓見(jiàn)女兒 法律維護(hù)探望權(quán)[N];河北日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
7 張劍邋藍(lán)莉;探望權(quán)為何執(zhí)行難?[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2007年
8 朱強(qiáng);探望權(quán)在實(shí)踐中的運(yùn)用[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2007年
9 姜旭春;淺談我國(guó)探望權(quán)的現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[N];云南經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
10 金健峰;訴訟中探望權(quán)的確定[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 周軼;論我國(guó)的探望權(quán)制度及其完善[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年
2 馬濤;探望權(quán)法律問(wèn)題探析[D];河北大學(xué);2010年
3 韓玟;探望權(quán)制度功能價(jià)值的實(shí)現(xiàn)及其完善[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年
4 湯雯;探望權(quán)制度的審思與完善[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2010年
5 彭昀峰;論我國(guó)探望權(quán)制度的立法完善[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年
6 呂虹;試論我國(guó)探望權(quán)制度及其完善[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年
7 丁美君;探望權(quán)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年
8 張威;論我國(guó)探望權(quán)制度的完善[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年
9 運(yùn)勝雷;論我國(guó)探望權(quán)制度[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年
10 劉文文;論我國(guó)的探望權(quán)制度及其完善[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年
,本文編號(hào):1872620
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/1872620.html