本文選題：準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系 + 權(quán)利義務(wù)�。� 參考：《沈陽工業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)如今，越來越多的年輕人開始接受并認(rèn)可一種體現(xiàn)自身主體性，崇尚個(gè)性自由的兩性結(jié)合的方式，也就是現(xiàn)在人們所說的準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系。準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系在現(xiàn)今社會(huì)的盛行，使得原始婚姻家庭的傳統(tǒng)地位受到了一定的沖擊，但是現(xiàn)今社會(huì)已經(jīng)開始逐步接納了準(zhǔn)婚姻這一新型的男女關(guān)系。包含中國在內(nèi)的世界各國也開始廣泛關(guān)注對(duì)其的立法規(guī)制。 作為現(xiàn)今社會(huì)已經(jīng)存在并延續(xù)了一定時(shí)期的準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系，現(xiàn)今社會(huì)已經(jīng)對(duì)其具體的制度做出了很大的關(guān)注，因?yàn)橐罁?jù)目前的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況來看，，準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系實(shí)際的關(guān)于解決各類糾紛的案例不勝枚舉，這也有利于人們的關(guān)于此的價(jià)值觀得到很大程度上的升華，也為日后完善我國準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系法律體系奠定了夯實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)。我國對(duì)于準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系的態(tài)度在不斷地變化之中，但對(duì)此詳細(xì)的司法解釋以及立法補(bǔ)充較少，使得對(duì)于該類問題的處理缺乏一定相應(yīng)的法律依據(jù)�；诖耍恼聦⑼ㄟ^闡述準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系的基本涵義，準(zhǔn)婚姻與其他相關(guān)概念的區(qū)分，準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系中涉及的各項(xiàng)法律關(guān)系，我國準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系的現(xiàn)狀分析以及結(jié)合國外對(duì)于準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系的現(xiàn)狀分析和立法規(guī)制，進(jìn)而對(duì)我國準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系的立法制度進(jìn)行合理的思考，最終可以從理論上對(duì)準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系的相關(guān)法律問題進(jìn)行探討和研究。 文章首先運(yùn)用說明和舉例的方式，論述了準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系的理論概述。闡釋了準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系法律涵義的性質(zhì)及基本特征，并將準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系與相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了區(qū)分，以及簡(jiǎn)單地介紹了其涉及的法律關(guān)系；其次，運(yùn)用理論與實(shí)際相結(jié)合的方法，闡述了我國準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系的社會(huì)現(xiàn)狀，從法律層面、法規(guī)層面和政策層面系統(tǒng)的分析了我國準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系存在后所產(chǎn)生的社會(huì)問題，表述了對(duì)我國準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制的必要性和緊迫性；再次，運(yùn)用比較分析的方法對(duì)國外有關(guān)規(guī)制準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系的立法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行了考察，歸納總結(jié)出可以值得我國借鑒的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)和立法啟示；文章最后運(yùn)用法學(xué)理論，為我國準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系制度之完善提出了具有一定價(jià)值的立法思考。其中，一是提出了適時(shí)修改或增設(shè)婚姻法的相關(guān)條款；二是適時(shí)對(duì)準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系作出司法解釋。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, more and more young people begin to accept and recognize a way of combining their own subjectivity and advocating the freedom of individuality, that is, the quasi marriage relationship that people say now. The prevalence of quasi marriage in today's society makes the traditional status of the primitive marriage family suffer a certain impact, but today's society has already been made. Since then, the quasi marital relationship has been gradually accepted. The countries around the world, including China, have begun to pay close attention to its legislative regulation.
As the present society has existed and continued the quasi marriage relationship for a certain period of time, the present society has made great attention to its specific system, because according to the current reality, the actual cases of the quasi marital relations on the settlement of various disputes are too numerous to enumerate, which is also beneficial to people's values on this. To a great extent, the sublimation also laid a solid foundation for the improvement of the legal system of the quasi marriage relations in our country. The attitude of our country to the quasi marriage relationship is constantly changing, but the detailed judicial interpretation and the legislative supplement lack the corresponding legal basis for the treatment of this kind of problem. The chapter will explain the basic meaning of the quasi marriage relationship, the distinction between the quasi marriage and other related concepts, the various legal relations involved in the quasi marriage relationship, the analysis of the status quo of the quasi marriage in China and the analysis of the status quo and the legislative regulation of the quasi marriage relations in foreign countries, and then the legislative system of the quasi marriage relationship in China is reasonable. Finally, we can discuss and study the related legal issues of marriage in theory.
The article first expounds the theoretical outline of the quasi marriage relationship by means of illustration and example, explains the nature and basic characteristics of the legal meaning of the quasi marriage relationship, and distinguishes the relationship between the quasi marriage and the related concepts, and briefly introduces the legal relationship it involves. Secondly, the method of combining theory with practice is used to explain the relationship. The social status of the quasi marriage relationship in China is described, and the social problems arising from the existence of the quasi marriage relationship in China are systematically analyzed from the legal, legal and policy levels, and the necessity and urgency of the legal regulation of the quasi marital relationship in China are expressed. The legislative practice of the marriage relationship was investigated, and the legislative experience and legislative inspiration that could be used for reference were summed up. At the end of the article, the author used the theory of law to put forward some valuable legislative thoughts for the perfection of the system of the quasi marriage relationship in our country. One is to put forward the relevant provisions of the timely modification or the establishment of the marriage law; two It is a judicial explanation for the timely alignment of marriage relations.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何麗新;;論事實(shí)婚姻與非婚同居的二元化規(guī)制[J];比較法研究;2009年02期

2 王薇;;非婚生子女撫養(yǎng)涉及的法律問題:由案件生發(fā)[J];重慶社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年04期

3 屈廣清;;國際私法保護(hù)弱勢(shì)群體的理論考量[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

4 陳葦,謝京杰;論“兒童最大利益優(yōu)先原則”在我國的確立——兼論《婚姻法》等相關(guān)法律的不足及其完善[J];法商研究;2005年05期

5 孟令志;;老年人同居的法律問題研究[J];法商研究;2008年04期

6 吳國平;;非婚同居的法律規(guī)制新探[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

7 王坤;;女性在非婚同居中損害的法律救濟(jì)[J];河北法學(xué);2009年07期

8 王金利;朱強(qiáng);李益;;事實(shí)婚姻和非婚同居之比較[J];湖北生態(tài)工程職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

9 蔣新苗,李贊,李娟;弱勢(shì)群體權(quán)利保護(hù)國際立法初探[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2004年04期

10 焦燕;;論涉外夫妻財(cái)產(chǎn)制的法律適用[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

本文編號(hào)：1814593