本文選題：家庭暴力 + 立法現(xiàn)狀��； 參考：《四川省社會科學(xué)院》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：家庭是一國社會最基本的組成團體,如果說社會是一張網(wǎng),那么家庭就是組成這張網(wǎng)的一個節(jié)。家庭在社會中扮演者必不可少、舉足輕重的角色。對于每個公民來講,談及家庭,給人的感覺應(yīng)該是歸屬感,是安全感,是我們在為生活奔波勞苦之后所想要棲息的地方。他應(yīng)該是我們的身體得以放松的一個居所,一個精神上得以休息的避風(fēng)港。但是理想與現(xiàn)實總會有一定的差距,生活總是給予我們一定的刺痛,讓我們看清她本來的面目,而家庭暴力,便是存在于這個社會的一根刺。嚴格來講,家庭暴力并不是近期甚至近幾十年來出現(xiàn)的一種社會現(xiàn)象,這種社會惡習(xí)由來已久,甚至已經(jīng)有了幾千年的歷史。它頑固的貫穿了我國從古代直到現(xiàn)代的一個歷史脈絡(luò),將根扎的根深蒂固,以至于現(xiàn)今我們難以將其一次性拔除。無獨有偶,家庭暴力并僅僅存在于我國,它已經(jīng)成為了一種世界性的惡習(xí),幾乎每一個國家都有部分公民遭受著家庭暴力的侵害。家庭暴力不僅僅是單純的暴力性毆打,它花樣百出,既包括身體上的摧殘,也包括受精神上的折磨。受暴者其基本人權(quán)被牢牢的束縛在家庭暴力的魔爪之下,沒有公平可言,沒有平等可言。別國我們暫且不提,令人可悲的是,我國雖然泱泱大國,精神文化沉淀了幾千年,卻在反對家庭暴力方面做得少之甚少。反而從我國尚未立法時期,就已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了男女不平等,男尊女卑,夫為妻綱的觀念,這種觀念一直持續(xù)了幾千年。更加令人可悲的是,到了現(xiàn)代社會,家庭暴力非但沒有遭人唾棄,讓人反抗,反而變本加厲。古代時期,家庭暴力是指存在于家庭之中的夫妻之間或者家長與子女之間的一種暴力,而現(xiàn)在社會,家庭暴力已經(jīng)蔓延到了非家庭之間,如情侶之間,同居者之間。更有甚者,子女毆打老人的家庭暴力也是存在的。不得不說我國在反家庭暴力方面所做的一切讓人心寒。統(tǒng)治者的冷漠,道德的無視,使得我國整個社會對家庭暴力的約束力度過于松泛,讓家庭暴力如細菌一般不斷蔓延。因此,本人圍繞家庭暴力行為,從家庭暴力的概況、國內(nèi)外對家庭暴力的規(guī)制、家庭暴力法的評析以及家庭暴力法的完善建議等方面對家庭暴力進行了一定的淺析。本文共包括四章內(nèi)容,具體內(nèi)容如下:第一章主要圍繞家庭暴力的基本情況做了一定概述。首先對家庭暴力這一概念進行界定,對其本質(zhì)特性進行詳細的分析。其次,闡述家庭暴力的主體的特定性、行為的隱蔽性、結(jié)果的嚴重性、大眾的放縱性等特點,進而分析家庭暴力的不利影響,即不僅侵害受暴者的健康權(quán)與自由權(quán),還會影響到未成年人的身心健康、破壞家庭幸福甚至擾亂社會穩(wěn)定。最后,從傳統(tǒng)觀念、立法現(xiàn)狀以及社會大眾態(tài)度等視角來分析家庭暴力如病毒般擴散的原因。第二章主要介紹了我國相關(guān)法律對家庭暴力的規(guī)定。我國雖然較晚的制定針對家庭暴力的專項立法,但是在此之前我國并非沒有對家庭暴力行為進行法律約束。作者通過列舉我國各部法律對家庭暴力的規(guī)定,進而分析我國關(guān)于家庭暴力立法的亮點與不足。第三章主要圍繞國國外法律對家庭暴力行為的規(guī)定進行探討評析。家庭暴力不僅僅是我國獨立存在的社會問題,而是國際間一個普遍存在的社會亂象。本文從國際的角度來闡述美國、英國、加拿大等國家在立法方面對家庭暴力的約束,與我國公權(quán)力介入家庭暴力的形式作比較,進而對我國在家庭暴力的法律規(guī)制方面做出一個相對完善的評析。第四章主要介紹了我國反家庭暴力應(yīng)該做出的完善。對于家庭暴力問題,我國自2016年以前,對家庭暴力行為進行制約的條文,都是零散的分布于各個法律法規(guī)當中,如《憲法》、《婦女權(quán)益保護法》、《刑法》、《民法》、《婚姻法》但是始終沒有一項專門的法律來對其進行規(guī)制,以至于公民對家庭暴力的嚴重危害性認識不足,沒有提起相當?shù)闹匾?進而使家庭暴力行為不斷出現(xiàn)。2016年3月1日起正式施行了《反家庭暴力法》,這是我國第一部專門圍繞家庭暴力所制定的一部專項立法,這部法律成為我國反家庭暴力立法史上的一個里程碑,緩解了我國無關(guān)于家庭暴力專項立法的尷尬,對我國反家暴有著重要的意義。本文從立法角度、司法角度等方面,闡述了我國在反家庭暴力方面應(yīng)該做出的完善。
[Abstract]:Family is the most basic social group in a country. If the society is a net, then the family is a part of the network. The family plays an indispensable and important role in the society. For every citizen, it is a sense of belonging and a sense of security that the feeling of a family is a sense of belonging and a sense of security. He should be a place where we want to live after suffering. He should be a home where our body is relaxed and a safe haven. But there is always a gap between ideal and reality. Life always gives us certain prickle, let us see her original face, and domestic violence is the one in this society. Root thorn. Strictly speaking, domestic violence is not a social phenomenon that has appeared in recent years or even in recent decades. This kind of social bad habit has been for a long time, even for thousands of years. It stubbornly runs through the history of our country from ancient to modern, so it is so deep-rooted that it is difficult to take it once. In fact, domestic violence and only exist in our country. It has become a world habit. In almost every country, some citizens have been violated by domestic violence. Domestic violence is not only a simple violent assault, but also a kind of physical destruction, including mental torture. The basic human rights of the victims are firmly tied to the clunches of domestic violence. There is no equity and no equality. In other countries, we do not mention it. It is sad that, although our country has been a great country, the spiritual culture has been precipitated for thousands of years, little is done in the opposition to domestic violence. Instead, it has not been legislated in our country. The concept of equality between men and women, men and women, and the concept of husband as a wife have lasted for thousands of years. More sadly, in modern society, domestic violence is not only spit on, but has become stronger. In ancient times, family violence refers to the husband and wife or parents in the family. A kind of violence between children, and today's society, family violence has spread to non families, such as lovers, cohabitation. Even more, the family violence of the children beating the elderly is also existing. It is hard to say that everything we do in the field of anti domestic violence is cold. The restraint of domestic violence is too loose in the whole society, and the family violence, like bacteria, is generally spread. Therefore, I have done a certain amount of domestic violence around domestic violence, from domestic violence, domestic and foreign regulation of domestic violence, the assessment of domestic violence law and the improvement of domestic violence law. This article includes four chapters, and the specific contents are as follows: the first chapter is mainly about the basic situation of domestic violence. Firstly, the concept of domestic violence is defined, and its essential characteristics are analyzed in detail. Secondly, the specific nature of the main body of domestic violence, the concealment of the behavior, the severity of the results, and the serious results are discussed. The disadvantageous influence of domestic violence is analyzed, namely, the adverse effects of domestic violence are not only infringed on the right to health and freedom of the victims, but also on the physical and mental health of the minors, destroying family happiness and even disturbing social stability. Finally, the domestic violence, such as the virus, is analyzed from the traditional concept, the legislative situation and the social public attitude. The second chapter mainly introduces the regulation of domestic violence in our country. Although our country is late to formulate special legislation for domestic violence, our country does not have no legal restraint on domestic violence before it. The author analyses the regulations of domestic violence by the laws of our country, and then analyses me. The third chapter mainly discusses the provisions of domestic violence in the country and abroad. Domestic violence is not only a social problem in our country, but also a common social disorder in the world. This article expounds the United States, Britain, Canada and so on from the international perspective. The state's restriction on domestic violence in legislation is compared with the form of public power involved in domestic violence in China, and then a relatively perfect analysis is made to the legal regulation of domestic violence in China. The fourth chapter mainly introduces the complete good of our country's anti domestic violence. For domestic violence, China has since 2016 Before, the provisions that restrict domestic violence are scattered scattered in various laws and regulations, such as the constitution, the law of the protection of women's rights and interests, the criminal law, the civil law, and the marriage law, but there is no special law to regulate it, so that the citizens' serious harm to domestic violence is insufficient and has not been mentioned. When we attach great importance to the domestic violence, the law of anti domestic violence has been formally implemented from March 1st.2016. This is the first special legislation enacted in our country specially around domestic violence. This law has become a milestone in the history of domestic violence legislation in our country, which has relieved our country's lack of domestic violence. The embarrassment of the law is of great significance to the anti domestic violence in China. This article, from the legislative angle and the judicial angle, expounds the perfection that our country should make in the aspect of anti domestic violence.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 李春斌;;《反家庭暴力法(征求意見稿)》的域外經(jīng)驗——大陸法系典型國家涉家庭暴力立法的考察報告[J];山東女子學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年02期

2 陳敏;;家庭暴力是暴力而不是糾紛[J];人民司法;2014年07期

3 劉淑芬;李瓊宇;;家庭暴力主體關(guān)系模型的構(gòu)建與演進——兼對“家庭成員”概念進行辨析[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2012年04期

4 李洪祥;;“家庭暴力”之法律概念解析[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2007年04期

5 金眉;;論反家庭暴力的立法缺失[J];法學(xué)家;2006年02期

6 唐紹洪;論中國社會轉(zhuǎn)型期夫妻之間的身體暴力沖突[J];天府新論;2004年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉昱輝;公權(quán)力介入家庭暴力的法理思考[D];中共中央黨校;2016年

2 羅杰;家庭暴力立法與實踐研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 李洋;反家庭暴力法證據(jù)制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

2 孫麗麗;家庭暴力法律對策研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

3 劉繼英;針對婦女的家庭暴力及其法律防治比較研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2012年

4 范祥;反家庭暴力立法研究[D];北方工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

5 都正偉;家庭暴力及其防治對策[D];南昌大學(xué);2008年

6 胡苷用;中美反家庭暴力問題探析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

7 劉艷梅;家庭暴力專項立法要點問題探討[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1779839