本文選題：家事　切入點(diǎn)：家事案件　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 家事訴訟案件在我國(guó)一直存在,但卻尚未設(shè)置單獨(dú)的家事訴訟程序,司法實(shí)際部門目前主要是依據(jù)民事訴訟法、婚姻法以及最高人民法院的司法解釋來對(duì)相關(guān)家事案件進(jìn)行處理,雖然可以基本應(yīng)對(duì),但是考慮到家事事件的特殊性,以及對(duì)其他國(guó)家相關(guān)家事訴訟程序的參考,設(shè)立單獨(dú)的家事訴訟程序在我國(guó)目前的情況下是十分必要的。家事事件事關(guān)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定和公序良俗,與一般財(cái)產(chǎn)法上的法律關(guān)系不同,它不能完全的由當(dāng)事人自由處分,而且家事事件更多地涉及感情、親情、倫理道德和隱私問題,因而我們有必要根據(jù)家事事件的不同性質(zhì)和特點(diǎn),為其設(shè)置相應(yīng)的訴訟程序,使其遵循不同的程序法例和程序規(guī)則,以利于糾紛的處理和當(dāng)事人權(quán)利的維護(hù)。普通的訴訟程序不能滿足現(xiàn)在家事案件訴訟的要求,主要表現(xiàn)在以下幾個(gè)方面:首先,普通的訴訟程序嚴(yán)格遵循私權(quán)自治的原則,在訴訟中給予當(dāng)事人較多地自由權(quán)和選擇權(quán),法院一般不予干預(yù);而家事案件則不完全適用私權(quán)自治的規(guī)則,其根本原因在于當(dāng)事人對(duì)訴訟標(biāo)的——身份關(guān)系不具有自由處分的權(quán)利。其次,家事事件是涉及公私雙益的一種社會(huì)關(guān)系,實(shí)體法就此關(guān)系作了規(guī)定,而無(wú)相應(yīng)的程序法保障,正像某學(xué)者所說的,無(wú)程序保障之正義是很難實(shí)現(xiàn)的,僅有實(shí)體法保障的正義在很大程度上只是一句空話,我國(guó)目前實(shí)體法對(duì)婚姻等方面問題有詳細(xì)的規(guī)定,但是訴訟法上沒有完全對(duì)應(yīng)的程序,例如婚姻無(wú)效之訴等。因此在立法上需要制定一套家事訴訟程序,區(qū)別于普通民事訴訟程序。隨著社會(huì)的不斷發(fā)展和科學(xué)技術(shù)的進(jìn)步,新的糾紛類型層出不窮,以公益、集團(tuán)糾紛等為代表的現(xiàn)代性訴訟不斷顯現(xiàn),有必要將其加以歸類梳理,完善我國(guó)的家事訴訟制度。 本文分四個(gè)部分,約34000字,第一部分概述家事訴訟的主要概念,并與其他訴訟程序進(jìn)行比較;第二部分摘選英美德日這四個(gè)英美法系和大陸法系的代表國(guó)家的家事訴訟程序進(jìn)行比較,并從機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置和程序規(guī)則兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行歸納;第三部分從我國(guó)古代的家族法訴訟的角度出發(fā),討論我國(guó)古代家族法訴訟和現(xiàn)代家事訴訟的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系,并從中得以啟示;第四部分為結(jié)論篇,主要是將比較研究的結(jié)果應(yīng)用到我國(guó)家事訴訟程序的構(gòu)建上,對(duì)我國(guó)家事訴訟程序的構(gòu)建淺略的提幾點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:Family litigation cases exist all the time in our country, but no separate family litigation procedures have been set up yet. At present, the actual judicial departments are mainly based on the Code of Civil procedure. Although the Marriage Law and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme people's Court can deal with the relevant family cases, although they can be basically dealt with, considering the particularity of the family affairs and the reference to the relevant family proceedings in other countries, It is very necessary to set up separate family proceedings under the present circumstances in our country. Family matters are related to social stability and public order and good customs, which are different from the legal relationship in general property law. It cannot be completely punished by the parties concerned freely. Moreover, family affairs involve more feelings, family feelings, ethics and privacy issues. Therefore, it is necessary for us to set up corresponding proceedings for family affairs according to their different nature and characteristics. Make it follow different procedural laws and procedural rules in order to facilitate the handling of disputes and the protection of the rights of the parties. Ordinary proceedings cannot meet the requirements of current family cases, mainly in the following aspects: first, The ordinary litigation procedure strictly follows the principle of private right autonomy, giving the parties more right of freedom and choice in litigation, and the court generally does not interfere, while family cases do not fully apply the rules of private right autonomy. The fundamental reason lies in the fact that the parties do not have the right to dispose freely of the subject-identity relationship. Secondly, the family affairs are a kind of social relationship involving both public and private interests, which is stipulated by the substantive law, but not guaranteed by the corresponding procedural law. As a certain scholar has said, justice without procedural protection is very difficult to achieve. The justice only guaranteed by substantive law is to a great extent empty talk. At present, the substantive law of our country has detailed provisions on marriage and other aspects. However, there are no corresponding procedures in the procedural law, such as the action of nullity of marriage, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a set of family procedure in legislation, which is different from ordinary civil procedure. With the development of society and the progress of science and technology, New types of disputes emerge one after another, and the modern litigation represented by public interest and group disputes is constantly emerging. It is necessary to sort it out and perfect the system of family litigation in our country. This article is divided into four parts, about 34000 words, the first part outlines the main concepts of family litigation, and compared with other proceedings; The second part selects the four Anglo-American legal system and the continental law system to compare the family litigation procedures, and from the two aspects of institutional setting and procedural rules to sum up; The third part discusses the difference and relation between the ancient family law litigation and the modern family law litigation from the angle of the ancient family law litigation in our country, and draws inspiration from it. This paper mainly applies the results of comparative research to the construction of family litigation procedure in China, and puts forward some suggestions on the construction of family litigation procedure in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：D915.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 吳志剛;;家事訴訟制度基本范疇研究[J];溫州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 曲洋;家事審判程序研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年

2 張卉;論人事訴訟程序[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

3 王晴;我國(guó)家事訴訟程序的建構(gòu)[D];燕山大學(xué);2012年

4 陳國(guó)華;婚姻訴訟特別程序研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2012年

5 郭磊;我國(guó)設(shè)置人事訴訟程序的思考[D];蘇州大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1604911