論我國(guó)離婚精神損害賠償?shù)姆赏晟?/H1>
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-03 06:44
本文選題：婚姻法 切入點(diǎn)：離婚 出處：《對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文 論文類型：學(xué)位論文
【摘要】： 2001年4月28日公布施行的《中華人民共和國(guó)婚姻法》第四十六條規(guī)定了離婚損害賠償制度,最高人民法院《關(guān)于適用中華人民共和國(guó)婚姻法若干問(wèn)題的解釋(一)》正式明確了離婚損害賠償包括物質(zhì)損害賠償及精神損害賠償兩方面,這是離婚立法改革的重大成果。 首先,筆者就離婚精神損害賠償?shù)母拍�、特征及意義進(jìn)行了論述。離婚精神損害賠償是指配偶一方違法侵害配偶他方的合法權(quán)益,導(dǎo)致婚姻關(guān)系破裂,離婚時(shí)無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)配偶所受的精神利益的損害和精神創(chuàng)傷,過(guò)錯(cuò)配偶應(yīng)承擔(dān)的民事責(zé)任。離婚精神損害賠償是加強(qiáng)社會(huì)主義法制的需要,是建立和諧社會(huì)的需要,是保護(hù)無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)方配偶合法權(quán)益、制裁過(guò)錯(cuò)方的需要。離婚精神損害賠償須有違法行為、損害事實(shí)、主觀過(guò)錯(cuò)、因果關(guān)系四個(gè)法定要件和四種法定原因。責(zé)任方式包括財(cái)產(chǎn)責(zé)任和非財(cái)產(chǎn)責(zé)任兩種方式。 其次,筆者就離婚精神賠償數(shù)額確定的法定因素和酌定考慮因素進(jìn)行論述。指出過(guò)錯(cuò)情況、損害后果、經(jīng)濟(jì)因素作為法定因素來(lái)考慮,而結(jié)婚時(shí)間、對(duì)家庭貢獻(xiàn)大小、社會(huì)地位、加害人的事后態(tài)度等一起作為酌定考慮因素,使賠償數(shù)額的確定既合法又合情合理。 最后,筆者就離婚精神損害賠償中若干問(wèn)題進(jìn)行初步探討,同時(shí)嘗試提出一些立法建議。筆者就離婚精神損害賠償?shù)恼?qǐng)求權(quán)利主體和義務(wù)主體進(jìn)行探討,認(rèn)為賠償權(quán)利主體應(yīng)拓寬為受害者;存在主觀過(guò)錯(cuò)的第三者承擔(dān)連帶賠償責(zé)任。筆者就離婚精神損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)利行使的時(shí)間進(jìn)行論述,并就離婚精神損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)的讓與和繼承進(jìn)行分析。筆者結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐,就離婚精神損害賠償中請(qǐng)求方是否一定以“無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)為原則”和“誰(shuí)主張誰(shuí)舉證”的證據(jù)原則進(jìn)行探討,提出區(qū)別過(guò)錯(cuò),過(guò)錯(cuò)相抵的原則來(lái)裁判案件;提出應(yīng)該區(qū)分不同情況分別對(duì)待,對(duì)無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)配偶的舉證確難到位的特定情況,可適用過(guò)錯(cuò)推定原則;就當(dāng)前社會(huì)上“其他導(dǎo)致離婚的重大過(guò)錯(cuò)”提出我國(guó)立法技術(shù)上應(yīng)采取列舉性規(guī)定和概括性規(guī)定相結(jié)合的方式,以保持立法的穩(wěn)定性和長(zhǎng)期性。
[Abstract]:Article 46th of the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China, promulgated on April 28th 2001, provides for the system of compensation for divorce damages. The interpretation (1) of the Supreme people's Court concerning the application of the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China (1) makes it clear that the compensation for divorce damages includes material damages and spiritual damages, which is a major achievement of the legislative reform on divorce. First of all, the author discusses the concept, characteristics and significance of the moral damage compensation for divorce, which means that one spouse violates the lawful rights and interests of the other spouse, which results in the breakdown of the marriage relationship. At the time of divorce, it is necessary to strengthen the socialist legal system and to build a harmonious society. It is the need to protect the lawful rights and interests of the spouse of the no-fault party and to punish the wrongdoing party. There are four legal elements and four legal reasons for causation. The way of liability includes two ways: property liability and non-property liability. Secondly, the author discusses the legal factors and discretionary factors for determining the amount of spiritual compensation for divorce. The author points out that fault situation, damage consequences, economic factors are considered as legal factors, while the time of marriage contributes to the family. The social status and the hindsight attitude of the victimizer are considered as the discretionary factors together, which make the determination of the amount of compensation legal and reasonable. Finally, the author makes a preliminary discussion on some problems in the compensation for moral damages of divorce, and tries to put forward some legislative suggestions. The author thinks that the subject of the right of compensation should be broadened to be the victim, the third party with subjective fault shall bear the joint and several liability for compensation. The author also analyzes the alienation and inheritance of the right to claim for moral damages in divorce. This paper discusses whether the claimant must take the principle of "no-fault" and "who claims who proves the evidence" to judge the case, and puts forward the principle of distinguishing fault and offsetting the fault; It is suggested that different cases should be treated separately, and the principle of presumption of fault can be applied to certain cases in which the proof of no-fault spouse is difficult to put in place. With regard to the "other major faults leading to divorce" in the society at present, the author puts forward that the legislation of our country should adopt the combination of enumeration and generality in order to maintain the stability and long-term nature of the legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張磊蕾;離婚中的精神損害賠償[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年
，
本文編號(hào)：1559949
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/1559949.html
本文選題：婚姻法 切入點(diǎn)：離婚 出處：《對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文 論文類型：學(xué)位論文
【摘要】： 2001年4月28日公布施行的《中華人民共和國(guó)婚姻法》第四十六條規(guī)定了離婚損害賠償制度,最高人民法院《關(guān)于適用中華人民共和國(guó)婚姻法若干問(wèn)題的解釋(一)》正式明確了離婚損害賠償包括物質(zhì)損害賠償及精神損害賠償兩方面,這是離婚立法改革的重大成果。 首先,筆者就離婚精神損害賠償?shù)母拍�、特征及意義進(jìn)行了論述。離婚精神損害賠償是指配偶一方違法侵害配偶他方的合法權(quán)益,導(dǎo)致婚姻關(guān)系破裂,離婚時(shí)無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)配偶所受的精神利益的損害和精神創(chuàng)傷,過(guò)錯(cuò)配偶應(yīng)承擔(dān)的民事責(zé)任。離婚精神損害賠償是加強(qiáng)社會(huì)主義法制的需要,是建立和諧社會(huì)的需要,是保護(hù)無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)方配偶合法權(quán)益、制裁過(guò)錯(cuò)方的需要。離婚精神損害賠償須有違法行為、損害事實(shí)、主觀過(guò)錯(cuò)、因果關(guān)系四個(gè)法定要件和四種法定原因。責(zé)任方式包括財(cái)產(chǎn)責(zé)任和非財(cái)產(chǎn)責(zé)任兩種方式。 其次,筆者就離婚精神賠償數(shù)額確定的法定因素和酌定考慮因素進(jìn)行論述。指出過(guò)錯(cuò)情況、損害后果、經(jīng)濟(jì)因素作為法定因素來(lái)考慮,而結(jié)婚時(shí)間、對(duì)家庭貢獻(xiàn)大小、社會(huì)地位、加害人的事后態(tài)度等一起作為酌定考慮因素,使賠償數(shù)額的確定既合法又合情合理。 最后,筆者就離婚精神損害賠償中若干問(wèn)題進(jìn)行初步探討,同時(shí)嘗試提出一些立法建議。筆者就離婚精神損害賠償?shù)恼?qǐng)求權(quán)利主體和義務(wù)主體進(jìn)行探討,認(rèn)為賠償權(quán)利主體應(yīng)拓寬為受害者;存在主觀過(guò)錯(cuò)的第三者承擔(dān)連帶賠償責(zé)任。筆者就離婚精神損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)利行使的時(shí)間進(jìn)行論述,并就離婚精神損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)的讓與和繼承進(jìn)行分析。筆者結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐,就離婚精神損害賠償中請(qǐng)求方是否一定以“無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)為原則”和“誰(shuí)主張誰(shuí)舉證”的證據(jù)原則進(jìn)行探討,提出區(qū)別過(guò)錯(cuò),過(guò)錯(cuò)相抵的原則來(lái)裁判案件;提出應(yīng)該區(qū)分不同情況分別對(duì)待,對(duì)無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)配偶的舉證確難到位的特定情況,可適用過(guò)錯(cuò)推定原則;就當(dāng)前社會(huì)上“其他導(dǎo)致離婚的重大過(guò)錯(cuò)”提出我國(guó)立法技術(shù)上應(yīng)采取列舉性規(guī)定和概括性規(guī)定相結(jié)合的方式,以保持立法的穩(wěn)定性和長(zhǎng)期性。
[Abstract]:Article 46th of the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China, promulgated on April 28th 2001, provides for the system of compensation for divorce damages. The interpretation (1) of the Supreme people's Court concerning the application of the Marriage Law of the people's Republic of China (1) makes it clear that the compensation for divorce damages includes material damages and spiritual damages, which is a major achievement of the legislative reform on divorce. First of all, the author discusses the concept, characteristics and significance of the moral damage compensation for divorce, which means that one spouse violates the lawful rights and interests of the other spouse, which results in the breakdown of the marriage relationship. At the time of divorce, it is necessary to strengthen the socialist legal system and to build a harmonious society. It is the need to protect the lawful rights and interests of the spouse of the no-fault party and to punish the wrongdoing party. There are four legal elements and four legal reasons for causation. The way of liability includes two ways: property liability and non-property liability. Secondly, the author discusses the legal factors and discretionary factors for determining the amount of spiritual compensation for divorce. The author points out that fault situation, damage consequences, economic factors are considered as legal factors, while the time of marriage contributes to the family. The social status and the hindsight attitude of the victimizer are considered as the discretionary factors together, which make the determination of the amount of compensation legal and reasonable. Finally, the author makes a preliminary discussion on some problems in the compensation for moral damages of divorce, and tries to put forward some legislative suggestions. The author thinks that the subject of the right of compensation should be broadened to be the victim, the third party with subjective fault shall bear the joint and several liability for compensation. The author also analyzes the alienation and inheritance of the right to claim for moral damages in divorce. This paper discusses whether the claimant must take the principle of "no-fault" and "who claims who proves the evidence" to judge the case, and puts forward the principle of distinguishing fault and offsetting the fault; It is suggested that different cases should be treated separately, and the principle of presumption of fault can be applied to certain cases in which the proof of no-fault spouse is difficult to put in place. With regard to the "other major faults leading to divorce" in the society at present, the author puts forward that the legislation of our country should adopt the combination of enumeration and generality in order to maintain the stability and long-term nature of the legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張磊蕾;離婚中的精神損害賠償[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號(hào)：1559949
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hyflw/1559949.html
最近更新
教材專著
