【摘要】：衣食住行是百姓最基本的生活需要，改革開放以來，我國綜合實力持續(xù)增強，人們生活水平節(jié)節(jié)上升，我國房地產市場日益繁榮，商品房的銷售交易量非常驚人。然而，觀察實際交易，，在房屋的銷售中，買賣雙方并不是直接立即簽訂商品房買賣合同，而是首先簽訂其預約合同，即商品房認購協(xié)議。伴隨商品房的大量銷售，商品房認購協(xié)議也被頻繁使用，于是與商品房認購協(xié)議相關的購房糾紛、矛盾也日益增多。而我國的《民法通則》、《合同法》等并沒有對此作出具體規(guī)定。《最高人民法院關于審理商品房買賣合同糾紛案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》針對商品房認購協(xié)議問題作出了定金罰則的規(guī)定。但該規(guī)定面對實踐中復雜的商品房認購協(xié)議糾紛顯得過于原則化，適用時缺乏可操作性。本文從預約合同的基礎理論出發(fā)，研究我國的商品房認購協(xié)議存在的問題，并借鑒國內外相關經驗，提出了建設性的意見。 本文共分為4個部分。 第一部分首先引出了商品房認購協(xié)議的相關理論問題，提出了商品房認購協(xié)議的概念是商品房買賣當事人在簽訂正式的商品房買賣合同之前所形成的具有法律效力的協(xié)議，介紹了商品房認購協(xié)議的特征，著重論證了商品房認購協(xié)議的法律性質是預約。 第二部分先介紹了我國商品房認購協(xié)議的立法實踐現(xiàn)狀，具體分析了我國立法實踐中商品房認購協(xié)議存在的問題，如缺乏明確的法律依據(jù)，沒有明確商品房認購協(xié)議的生效要件，商品房認購協(xié)議的定金責任的適用認識不同，對商品房認購協(xié)議是否可以適用強制履行存在爭議，對違反商品房認購協(xié)議的違約賠償范圍確定不同等問題。 第三部分考慮到商品房認購協(xié)議的實質是預約合同，應當分析借鑒國外關于預約合同的立法理論。因此這一章主要先介紹了大陸法系、英美法系的預約合同的立法現(xiàn)狀，并結合我國商品房認購協(xié)議制度的不足，總結出了借鑒的意義。 第四部分探討了針對我國的商品房認購協(xié)議立法和實踐中存在的具體問題，在分析借鑒國外預約合同的立法現(xiàn)狀的基礎上，一一對應提出了具體的完善建議。
[Abstract]:Food, clothing, housing and transportation are the most basic living needs of the people. Since the reform and opening up, the comprehensive strength of our country has been continuously strengthened, the living standard of people has been rising, the real estate market of our country is booming day by day, and the sales volume of commercial housing is very amazing. However, observing the actual transaction, in the sale of the house, the buyer and seller do not sign the commercial house sale contract directly, but sign their reservation contract first, that is, the commercial house subscription agreement. With a large number of sales of commercial housing, commercial housing subscription agreement is also frequently used, so the purchase of housing disputes related to the agreement on the purchase of commercial housing, contradictions are also increasing day by day. And the "General principles of Civil Law" in China, The Supreme people's Court's explanation of some legal issues applicable to the trial of disputes over the sale and purchase of commercial housing has made a stipulation on the fixed penalty for the subscription agreement of commercial housing. However, the regulation is too principled and lacks maneuverability when it is applied in the face of complicated commercial house subscription agreement disputes in practice. Based on the basic theory of reservation contract, this paper studies the problems existing in the subscription agreement of commercial housing in our country, and draws lessons from the relevant experience at home and abroad, and puts forward some constructive suggestions. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part first leads to the relevant theoretical issues of the commercial housing subscription agreement, and puts forward that the concept of the commercial housing subscription agreement is a legally effective agreement formed by the commercial housing buyers and sellers before the signing of the formal contract for the sale of commercial housing. This paper introduces the characteristics of the commercial housing subscription agreement, and emphatically demonstrates that the legal nature of the commercial house subscription agreement is reservation. The second part first introduces the current situation of the legislation practice of the commercial house subscription agreement in our country, and analyzes the problems existing in the commercial house subscription agreement in our country, such as lack of clear legal basis. There is no clear requirements for the validity of the commercial housing subscription agreement, and the application of the deposit liability of the commercial housing subscription agreement is different. There is a dispute as to whether the commercial housing subscription agreement can be applied to the compulsory performance. The scope of compensation for breach of commercial housing subscription agreement to determine different issues. In the third part, considering that the essence of the subscription agreement of commercial housing is the reservation contract, we should analyze and learn from the legislative theory of the reservation contract in foreign countries. Therefore, this chapter mainly introduces the legislation status of civil law system and Anglo-American law system, and summarizes the significance of reference in combination with the deficiency of China's commercial house subscription agreement system. The fourth part discusses the specific problems existing in the legislation and practice of the commercial house subscription agreement in our country. On the basis of analyzing the current situation of the legislation of foreign booking contract, the author puts forward some specific suggestions for perfection.
【學位授予單位】：廣東商學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 白玉;;預約合同的法理及其應用[J];東岳論叢;2009年07期

2 竇權宏;商品房買賣中認購書及定金的法律性質[J];中國房地產;2004年07期

3 錢玉林;預約合同初論[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2003年04期

4 安玉霞;;預約合同制度探析[J];今日南國(理論創(chuàng)新版);2009年04期

5 王崇能;論商品房認購書的法律意義[J];福建工程學院學報;2003年03期

6 李秀民;;預約若干法律問題探析[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2006年01期

7 李雄;;商品房買賣中的法律焦點問題思考[J];理論探索;2006年02期

8 黃宇健;;商品房認購書的效力問題研究[J];寧德師專學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年04期

9 白玉;牟憲魁;;預約合同若干法律問題探析[J];齊魯學刊;2009年04期

10 王勤勞;;商品房認購書的性質與法律效力[J];企業(yè)經濟;2012年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 付振興;我國商品房預售風險控制的法律對策[D];華東政法大學;2010年

2 張小俊;商品房預約合同法律問題研究[D];河南大學;2011年

3 顧漱巖;我國商品房買賣關系中對購房者權益保護的案例分析[D];蘭州大學;2011年

4 范源杰;論商品房認購書的效力及其相關法律問題[D];內蒙古大學;2011年

5 李t;論商品房買受人的法律風險與防范[D];中南大學;2011年

6 王蓉;預約合同研究[D];山東大學;2007年

7 隆麗麗;期房買受人面臨的欺詐風險之法律問題研究[D];西南政法大學;2008年

8 郭勇;商品房認購書與商品房預售合同的區(qū)分[D];西南政法大學;2008年

9 茹玉;論商品房預售制度中預購人的權利保護[D];吉林大學;2008年

10 張利;預約合同法律問題研究[D];復旦大學;2008年

本文編號：2399886