【摘要】：因建設工程具有周期長、結(jié)構復雜、涉及面廣,以及存在著眾多不確定的因素,決定著建設工程索賠糾紛發(fā)生的必然性。建設工程索賠糾紛伴隨著工程的進展而層出不窮。改革開放以后,中國也陸續(xù)出臺了《招投標法》、《建筑法》、《合同法》等法律法規(guī),這些法律法規(guī)構建了我國建設工程索賠的法律體系。 但是由于法律規(guī)定的原則性以及滯后性,在處理相關建設工程索賠問題時,缺乏可操作性。國外針對工程索賠的研究已經(jīng)很深入,已經(jīng)形成了一套完整的理論體系。但我國對建設工程索賠方面的研究尚處于初步階段,尚未形成一套完整的體系。大多數(shù)研究者是從工程管理方面入手,從項目管理及合同管理的角度來對工程索賠進行分析。對于工程索賠所依據(jù)的法律原則以及合同條款的效力方面,研究較少。而建設工程索賠所面對的更多是一些法律問題,是對于合同履行過程中雙方的權利義務的確認。通過對建設工程索賠背后的法律原則剖析,研究現(xiàn)行法律的不足之處,對于完善立法、指導建筑施工合同條款的制定,解決雙方n的爭議,具有理論研究的必要性和現(xiàn)實的研究價值。 本文主要分四個部分對我國建設工程索賠的相關制度進行分析： 第一部分為建設工程索賠的基本理論。通過對建設工程程索賠的含義解讀及工程索賠的分類,建設工程索賠與合同價款、違約責任、工程簽證的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系,以及建設工程索賠應當遵循的一般原則進行了剖析,展示了建設工程索賠的基本概念及其與相關概念的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系,以及建設工程索賠的基本原理。 第二部分為我國建設工程索賠相關制度及實踐考察。詳細介紹了我國現(xiàn)行的建設工程索賠相關的法律、法規(guī)、規(guī)章制度及司法解釋,分析了我國常用的建筑施工合同示范文本及FIDIC施工條件中的索賠條款以及我國建設工程索賠的常見類型。 第三部分為我國建設工程索賠存在的問題。分析了我國建設工程索賠立法方面存在的問題、司法實踐中存在的問題、施工合同示范文本存在的問題以及承包人在建設工程索賠方面的問題。諸如存在立法疏漏及缺陷、專業(yè)法官缺失、示范文本存在瑕疵及與工程實踐脫節(jié)、承包人存在錯誤的索賠意識及索賠水平低下等問題。 第四部分為關于改進我國建設工程索賠制度的建議。針對我國建設工程索賠存在的問題,有針對性的提出了立法方面的完善建議、司法實踐的完善建議、施工合同示范文本的完善建議以及改進承包人建設工程索賠水平的完善建議。希望從立法司法、使用及當事人意識等全方面進行改進,以期提高我國建設工程索賠的水平,構建我國建設工程索賠的完整體系。
[Abstract]:Because the construction project has long period, complex structure, wide coverage and many uncertain factors, it determines the inevitability of the construction project claim dispute. Along with the progress of the project, the dispute of claim for construction project emerges in endlessly. After the reform and opening up, China has issued the Law of bidding, the Law of Construction, the Law of contract Law and so on. These laws and regulations have set up the legal system of claims for construction projects in China. However, due to the principle and lag of the legal provisions, there is a lack of maneuverability in dealing with the related construction project claims. Foreign research on engineering claims has been very thorough, has formed a complete theoretical system. However, the research on construction claim in our country is still in the initial stage and has not yet formed a complete system. Most researchers begin with project management and analyze project claims from project management and contract management. Little research has been done on the legal principles and the validity of the contract terms on which the engineering claim is based. The construction project claims are faced with more legal problems, which is the confirmation of the rights and obligations of both parties in the process of contract performance. Through the analysis of the legal principle behind the construction project claim, the deficiency of the current law is studied, which can improve the legislation, guide the formulation of the construction contract terms, and resolve the dispute between the two sides. It has the necessity of theoretical research and practical research value. This paper is divided into four parts to analyze the related system of the construction project claim in China: the first part is the basic theory of the construction project claim. Based on the interpretation of the meaning of the construction project claim and the classification of the engineering claim, the difference and relation between the construction project claim and the contract price, the liability for breach of contract, the project visa, and the general principles that should be followed in the construction project claim, the article analyzes the general principles to be followed in the construction project claim. The basic concept of construction engineering claim and the difference and relation between it and related concepts, as well as the basic principle of construction engineering claim are presented. The second part is the related system and practice investigation of the construction project claim in our country. It introduces in detail the relevant laws, regulations, rules and regulations and judicial interpretation of the current construction project claims in China. This paper analyzes the common model text of construction contract in our country, the claim clause in FIDIC construction condition and the common types of construction project claim in our country. The third part is our country construction project claim existence question. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the legislation of construction engineering claims in our country, the problems in judicial practice, the problems existing in the model text of construction contracts and the problems of contractors in claims for construction projects. Such problems as legislative omission and defects, lack of professional judges, defects in the model text and its disconnection with engineering practice, false claim consciousness of the contractor and low claim level, etc. The fourth part is about improving the construction project claim system of our country. In view of the problems existing in the claim for compensation for construction projects in our country, the author puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of legislation and judicial practice. The suggestion of perfecting the model text of construction contract and improving the claim level of contractor construction project. The author hopes to improve the legislation and judicature, usage and the consciousness of the parties in order to raise the level of claims for construction projects in our country and to build a complete system of claims for claims in construction projects in our country.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6;D922.297

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 劉祖容;;淺談建筑工程索賠[J];廣西城鎮(zhèn)建設;2008年05期

2 彭志陽;沈杰;;施工合同條件中索賠條款的研究[J];建筑管理現(xiàn)代化;2009年03期

3 褚劍鳴;;工程項目管理中的索賠技巧[J];建筑設計管理;2008年03期

4 張孝楠;;淺談建設工程索賠[J];科技信息;2010年01期

5 胡長明;李赫然;;施工索賠現(xiàn)狀分析與對策[J];施工技術;2008年06期

6 姚東森;;敘述建設工程的索賠及應用[J];中小企業(yè)管理與科技(上旬刊);2011年09期

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 江卓;施工索賠理論與策略研究[D];武漢理工大學;2006年

2 王立東;從總承包商角度對工程索賠原因的分析與方法研究[D];北京交通大學;2007年

3 任立坤;建筑企業(yè)施工索賠問題研究[D];中國石油大學;2007年

4 李玉棟;建設工程承包商費用索賠決策研究[D];中國海洋大學;2009年

5 孫力博;FIDIC雙贏思想下承包商索賠預防與處理[D];天津理工大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2396296