【摘要】：民法對(duì)受欺詐合同調(diào)整的特定思路是：維護(hù)意思自治，以意思表示是否自由、真實(shí)為判斷合同效力的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；區(qū)分欺詐行為與受欺詐的民事行為，重在對(duì)受欺詐人損失的補(bǔ)償。我國(guó)民法學(xué)界的傳統(tǒng)觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為，規(guī)定欺詐合同無(wú)效，有利于加強(qiáng)國(guó)家對(duì)合同關(guān)系的干預(yù)，懲罰欺詐人。但筆者認(rèn)為，，規(guī)定欺詐合同為可撤銷合同，更符合民法對(duì)受欺詐合同調(diào)整的特定思路。大陸法系民法對(duì)受欺詐合同的法律后果，區(qū)分相對(duì)人欺詐與第三人欺詐，分別作出規(guī)定，并對(duì)為第三人利益締結(jié)的合同中的欺詐問題和可撤銷制度適用的排除作出規(guī)定，均值得我國(guó)起草統(tǒng)一合同法時(shí)借鑒
[Abstract]:The special idea of civil law to adjust the fraudulent contract is to maintain the autonomy of the will, to express whether the will is free, and to judge the validity of the contract according to whether the will is free or not, to distinguish the fraudulent act from the fraudulent civil act, and to pay more attention to the compensation for the deceptive person's loss. The traditional view of the civil law circle in our country is that the stipulation of the invalidity of the fraudulent contract is conducive to strengthening the state's intervention in the contractual relationship and punishing the fraudster. However, the author thinks that the regulation of fraudulent contract as revocable contract is more in line with the specific idea of civil law. The civil law of the civil law system of civil law sets out separate provisions on the legal consequences of fraudulent contracts, which distinguish between fraud by counterpart and fraud by third parties, and on the issue of fraud in contracts concluded for the benefit of third parties and the exclusion of the application of the system of revocability. It is worthy of our country to draw lessons from the drafting of uniform contract law.
【作者單位】： 鄭州大學(xué)法學(xué)院 鄭州大學(xué)法學(xué)院
【分類號(hào)】：D923.64

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊代雄;;私權(quán)一般理論與民法典總則的體系構(gòu)造——德國(guó)民法典總則的學(xué)理基礎(chǔ)及其對(duì)我國(guó)的立法啟示[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年01期

2 嚴(yán)勵(lì);刑事政策價(jià)值目標(biāo)的追問[J];政法論壇;2003年05期

3 潘佳銘;法治概念的性質(zhì)探析[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

4 毛

本文編號(hào)：2327246