本文選題：債權(quán)讓與 + 債權(quán)讓與通知��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：債權(quán)讓與是指在保持債的同一性的前提下，債權(quán)人發(fā)生變化。債權(quán)讓與突破了債的相對性，是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的結(jié)果。在債權(quán)讓與中，要正確處理好產(chǎn)生債權(quán)的行為，債權(quán)讓與合同和債權(quán)讓與三者之間的關(guān)系。債權(quán)讓與通知是債權(quán)讓與制度中核心內(nèi)容。各國對于債權(quán)讓與通知的效力，通知主體，通知方式都有不同的規(guī)定，而我國的《合同法》并沒有關(guān)于這部分內(nèi)容的詳細(xì)規(guī)定，這也給實(shí)踐帶來了困難，尤其是面臨雙重讓與情形時(shí)，債權(quán)讓與通知的效力關(guān)系到各方當(dāng)事人的利益。采用債權(quán)讓與通知是債權(quán)讓與的生效要件的理論可以較好的解決這一問題。本文第一章簡要介紹了債權(quán)讓與制度，主要介紹了債權(quán)讓與的概念，歷史發(fā)展和一些國家的立法例。第二章分析了債權(quán)讓與這個行為的性質(zhì)，主要是從債權(quán)讓與是否是處分行為以及有因無因這兩點(diǎn)展開分析。本文第三章則集中在債權(quán)的可讓與性這個特點(diǎn)上。本文介紹了幾種不可讓與的債權(quán)，即根據(jù)債權(quán)的性質(zhì)不能讓與的，當(dāng)事人約定不能讓與的，法律規(guī)定不能讓與的。并且特別討論了理論界比較有爭議的幾種債權(quán)的可讓與性，包括未來債權(quán)，部分債權(quán)和自然債權(quán)的讓與性。本文的第四章簡略的討論了債權(quán)讓與的善意取得問題。第五章是本文比較重要的一章，詳細(xì)地就債權(quán)讓與的通知制度進(jìn)行了分析。本文從債權(quán)讓與的性質(zhì)角度認(rèn)為債權(quán)讓與的通知是債權(quán)讓與的生效要件，這個觀點(diǎn)和一些國家的通說并不相符。本文還介紹了在采用生效要件的理論情況下，，債權(quán)讓與通知的主體，對象，方式以及通知例外等問題。在第六章，本文涉及了關(guān)于債權(quán)讓與的另一項(xiàng)重要的制度，即債權(quán)讓與的效力問題，包括債權(quán)讓與的效力范圍和債權(quán)雙重讓與的效力。 債權(quán)的財(cái)產(chǎn)性使其在當(dāng)今經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過程中發(fā)揮著重要的作用，特別是在融資領(lǐng)域。債權(quán)讓與作為債權(quán)流通的重要形式，其能減少商品和貨幣的流通環(huán)節(jié)，有效的配置資源，清晰的界定產(chǎn)權(quán)，規(guī)避商業(yè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，在日常交易中功能日益重要。本文在第七章介紹了以債權(quán)讓與制度為基礎(chǔ)的保理制度和資產(chǎn)證券化的內(nèi)容。我國法律在這方面還有很大的發(fā)展空間，希望通過完善我國的法律規(guī)定從而使債權(quán)讓與制度發(fā)揮更大的作用。
[Abstract]:Assignment of creditor's rights refers to the change of creditor under the premise of keeping the identity of debt. The transfer of creditor's rights breaks through the relativity of debt and is the result of economic development. In the assignment of creditor's rights, the relationship between the contract of assignment of creditor's rights and the assignment of creditor's rights should be dealt with correctly. The notice of assignment of creditor's rights is the core content of the system of assignment of creditor's rights. Different countries have different regulations on the effectiveness of notice of assignment of creditor's rights, the subject of notice and the way of notification. However, the contract Law of our country does not have detailed provisions on this part of the notice, which also brings difficulties to practice. Especially in the case of double assignment, the effectiveness of notice of assignment of creditor's rights is related to the interests of the parties. The theory that the notice of assignment of creditor's rights is the effective element of assignment of creditor's rights can solve this problem well. The first chapter briefly introduces the system of assignment of creditor's rights, mainly introduces the concept of assignment of creditor's rights, historical development and legislative examples of some countries. The second chapter analyzes the nature of the act of assignment of creditor's rights, mainly from the point of view of whether the assignment of creditor's rights is a disposition act and whether there is a cause or not. The third chapter focuses on the transferability of creditor's rights. This paper introduces several kinds of non-transferable creditor's rights, that is, those that cannot be transferable according to the nature of the creditor's rights, those that the parties agree cannot be transferable, and those that are not transferable according to the law. In particular, the transferability of several kinds of claims, including future claims, partial claims and natural claims, is discussed. The fourth chapter briefly discusses the issue of bona fide acquisition of assignment of creditor's rights. The fifth chapter is an important chapter of this paper, the system of notice of assignment of creditor's rights is analyzed in detail. From the point of view of the nature of the assignment of the creditor's rights, this paper holds that the notice of the assignment of the creditor's rights is the effective element of the assignment of the creditor's rights, which is not consistent with the general theory of some countries. This paper also introduces the subject, object, method and exception of notice of assignment of creditor's rights under the theory of effective elements. In the sixth chapter, this paper deals with another important system of assignment of creditor's rights, that is, the validity of assignment of creditor's rights, including the scope of validity of assignment of creditor's rights and the effect of double assignment of creditor's rights. The property nature of creditor's rights makes it play an important role in the process of economic development, especially in the field of financing. As an important form of the circulation of creditor's rights, the assignment of creditor's rights can reduce the circulation link of commodity and currency, allocate resources effectively, define property right clearly, avoid commercial risk, and play an increasingly important role in daily transaction. In the seventh chapter, the author introduces factoring system and asset securitization based on assignment of creditor's rights. There is still a lot of room for the development of Chinese law in this respect. It is hoped that the system of assignment of creditor's rights will play a greater role by perfecting the legal provisions of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王克先;淺談債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓通知[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年12期

2 孫超;;論債權(quán)讓與中通知程序的構(gòu)建[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

3 申衛(wèi)星;試論合同權(quán)利轉(zhuǎn)讓的條件[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年05期

4 施漢嶸;析債權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓若干法律問題[J];法律適用;2003年07期

5 崔建遠(yuǎn),韓海光;債權(quán)讓與的法律構(gòu)成論[J];法學(xué);2003年07期

6 張雪忠;通知:債權(quán)移轉(zhuǎn)的生效要件——對傳統(tǒng)立法與理論的反思[J];法學(xué);2005年07期

7 趙巖;;債權(quán)讓與通知若干法律問題探討[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

8 杜文宏;國際保理中的債權(quán)讓與[J];國際金融研究;1998年03期

9 其木提;;債權(quán)讓與通知的效力——最高人民法院(2004)民二終字第212號民事判決評釋[J];交大法學(xué);2010年01期

10 劉堅(jiān);析資產(chǎn)證券化及其對現(xiàn)代金融體系的影響[J];人文雜志;2000年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 洪艷蓉;資產(chǎn)證券化若干法律問題比較研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 范麗敏;債權(quán)讓與制度研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2003年

2 于瀧;與資產(chǎn)證券化相關(guān)的若干債權(quán)讓與法律問題研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

本文編號：1791880