發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-20 20:17

  本文選題：專利許可合同 + 專利無效��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：以專利創(chuàng)新為代表的21世紀(jì)中,專利法律制度鼓勵(lì)創(chuàng)造者創(chuàng)新并保障創(chuàng)造者的專有權(quán)利。專利許可合同在專利技術(shù)創(chuàng)新及其應(yīng)用方面必不可少。專利許可是專利權(quán)實(shí)施的主要形式。對(duì)專利許可合同的研究可以促進(jìn)技術(shù)的應(yīng)用與推廣,實(shí)現(xiàn)利潤最大化。但是目前我國對(duì)專利許可合同的研究僅限于一般的技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同層面,并沒有深入進(jìn)行研究。本文通過借鑒合同法、專利法的基本原理,對(duì)專利許可合同涉及的一些法律問題進(jìn)行研究。全文共分四章。 第一章為專利許可合同概述。主要介紹了專利許可使用權(quán)的性質(zhì),專利許可合同的立法模式以及專利許可合同的特征、標(biāo)的、類型等。 第二章主要對(duì)影響專利許可合同的法律行為進(jìn)行分析。首先,專利無效后,許可合同的效力問題是法律界一直探討的問題。在實(shí)踐中有很多導(dǎo)致專利無效的事由,而無效后許可合同的效力對(duì)合同雙方當(dāng)事人的利益有很大的影響。其次,無處分權(quán)人訂立的專利許可合同在實(shí)踐中也很容易出現(xiàn),本文認(rèn)為,若無其他效力瑕疵,無處分權(quán)人簽訂的專利許可合同應(yīng)為有效合同,并對(duì)其合理性進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的論證。再次,目前我國的專利許可合同的登記采取的是備案式登記,對(duì)合同引起的權(quán)利變動(dòng)的登記公示功能沒有體現(xiàn),使得在司法實(shí)踐中有很多案例得不到合理判決。本文主要對(duì)三類主要類型的許可合同區(qū)分其性質(zhì)來討論登記的必要性。 第三章探討了專利許可合同中的一類特殊性條款——限制性商業(yè)條款。首先對(duì)限制性條款的定義進(jìn)行列舉,然后分析了限制性條款產(chǎn)生的原因以及表現(xiàn)形式。通過以上分析得出專利權(quán)具有專有、獨(dú)占、壟斷的特征使得許可人與被許可人的法律地位并不平等。其次通過各國對(duì)限制性條款的規(guī)制的比較分析,為我國限制性條款的法律規(guī)制提供了借鑒。 第四章在針對(duì)前述三章討論的許可合同的法律問題的基礎(chǔ)上來對(duì)我國專利許可合同相關(guān)立法完善提出自己的建議。從而可以讓專利許可合同更好的發(fā)揮作用,使專利技術(shù)得到充分實(shí)施,創(chuàng)造更大的利潤。
[Abstract]:In the 21st century, represented by patent innovation, patent law system encourages creators to innovate and protects the exclusive rights of creators. Patent license contract is indispensable in patent technology innovation and application. Patent license is the main form of patent enforcement. The research of patent license contract can promote the application and promotion of technology and realize the profit maximization. But at present, the research of patent license contract in our country is limited to the general technology transfer contract level, and has not carried on the thorough research. By referring to the basic principles of contract law and patent law, this paper studies some legal issues involved in patent license contract. The full text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is an overview of the patent license contract. This paper mainly introduces the nature of the right to use the patent license, the legislative model of the patent license contract, the characteristics, the object and the type of the patent license contract. The second chapter mainly analyzes the legal behavior that affects the patent license contract. First, after the patent is invalid, the validity of the license contract has been discussed by the legal profession. In practice, there are many reasons leading to the invalidation of patent, and the validity of the license contract after invalidation has a great influence on the interests of both parties to the contract. Secondly, the patent license contract concluded by the nowhere decentralizer is also easy to appear in practice. This paper holds that the patent license contract signed by the nowhere decentralized person should be a valid contract if there is no other defect in its validity. The rationality is demonstrated in detail. Thirdly, at present, the registration of patent license contract in our country adopts the record type registration, and the registration public function of the rights change caused by the contract is not reflected, which makes many cases can not be judged reasonably in the judicial practice. This paper discusses the necessity of registration by distinguishing the nature of three main types of license contracts. Chapter three discusses a kind of special clause in patent license contract-restrictive commercial clause. Firstly, the definition of restrictive clauses is listed, then the reasons and manifestations of restrictive clauses are analyzed. Through the above analysis, it is concluded that patent has the characteristics of exclusive, exclusive and monopoly, which makes the legal status of licensor and licensee unequal. Secondly, through the comparative analysis of the restrictive clause regulation in various countries, it provides reference for the legal regulation of the restrictive clause in our country. In the fourth chapter, on the basis of the legal problems of the licensing contract discussed in the above three chapters, the author puts forward his own suggestions on the perfection of the relevant legislation of the patent licensing contract in China. Thus, the patent license contract can play a better role, make the patent technology fully implemented, and create more profits.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭貴;論契約自由原則的新生——契約自由與社會(huì)公正的沖突與平衡[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年02期

2 董美根;;專利許可合同若干問題研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年10期

3 董美根;;我國專利許可合同登記必要性研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年02期

4 鄧毅灃;;技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同中限制條款法律效力評(píng)析[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年02期

5 曹新明;;專利許可協(xié)議中的有色條款功能研究[J];法商研究;2007年01期

6 鄭友德;胡章怡;;歐盟知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷問題研究——以歐盟新修訂的《技術(shù)許可協(xié)議集體豁免條例》為中心[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年06期

7 吳玉娟;;專利許可中專利無效的法律問題探析[J];廣東廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

8 汪慧敏;;專利實(shí)施許可合同的法律審查研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年12期

9 常偉;;淺析專利無效與專利合同效力的辯證關(guān)系[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2013年08期

10 張麗娜;論國際許可合同中的限制性條款[J];河北法學(xué);2003年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1779263