發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-08 15:27

  本文選題：家教服務(wù)合同　切入點(diǎn)：委托合同　出處：《天津商業(yè)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：家教市場(chǎng)的繁榮使得實(shí)踐中的家教糾紛日益增多,但是我國(guó)卻沒有相應(yīng)的法律規(guī)定進(jìn)行規(guī)制,出現(xiàn)了理論與實(shí)踐脫節(jié)的情形。本文從合同法角度對(duì)家教服務(wù)進(jìn)行研究,我國(guó)大多是從教育學(xué)的角度對(duì)家教服務(wù)進(jìn)行理論研究,學(xué)者周江洪在對(duì)服務(wù)合同的研究中提到,服務(wù)合同是一種無名合同,但在我國(guó)合同法中沒有明確的規(guī)定,家教服務(wù)合同作為一種服務(wù)合同,從字面意思上理解,是一種提供家教服務(wù)的合同,它的標(biāo)的是傳授知識(shí)和學(xué)習(xí)方法。 本文對(duì)家教服務(wù)合同進(jìn)行研究,首先是家教服務(wù)合同的概述,界定了家教服務(wù)合同的稱謂,內(nèi)涵及其特征。其次是家教服務(wù)合同的性質(zhì),本文通過家教服務(wù)合同與委托合同,承攬合同和雇傭合同進(jìn)行辨析闡明了家教服務(wù)合同的一般性質(zhì),接著通過家教服務(wù)合同與教育合同和教育培訓(xùn)合同的辨析說明了其特殊性質(zhì)。最后是家教服務(wù)合同的責(zé)任,家教服務(wù)合同由于其特殊性,分為兩個(gè)階段：試講階段和授課服務(wù)階段,根據(jù)其這一特殊性,大膽的將其責(zé)任分為試講階段的責(zé)任和授課服務(wù)階段的責(zé)任,分別進(jìn)行了分析。 本文主要運(yùn)用的研究方法有：首先,調(diào)查分析研究�，F(xiàn)實(shí)生活中的家教服務(wù)進(jìn)行調(diào)查研究以及自己家教的經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)家教服務(wù)合同進(jìn)行了界定和性質(zhì)分析。其次,比較分析研究。對(duì)家教服務(wù)合同的一般性質(zhì)進(jìn)行界定時(shí),把它跟委托合同、承攬合同以及雇傭合同進(jìn)行了比較,對(duì)其特殊性質(zhì)進(jìn)行界定時(shí),把家教服務(wù)合同與教育合同、教育培訓(xùn)合同進(jìn)行了比較。再次,學(xué)科交叉研究。本文的著眼點(diǎn)市從合同法的角度來研究家教服務(wù),但是家教服務(wù)會(huì)涉及到社會(huì)學(xué)、教育學(xué)的內(nèi)容,所以,法學(xué)和社會(huì)學(xué)、教育學(xué)相互結(jié)合是本文的必須要遵循的視角。 本文主要?jiǎng)?chuàng)新點(diǎn)如下：首先,研究角度的創(chuàng)新。我國(guó)對(duì)家教服務(wù)的理論研究側(cè)重在教育學(xué)方面,鮮有學(xué)者從法律角度對(duì)其進(jìn)行研究,而本文從合同法的角度對(duì)家教服務(wù)進(jìn)行了分析,以期對(duì)實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的家教服務(wù)糾紛有所規(guī)制。其次,研究?jī)?nèi)容的創(chuàng)新。根據(jù)家教服務(wù)責(zé)任的特殊性,將其責(zé)任分為試講階段的責(zé)任和授課服務(wù)責(zé)任,并分別進(jìn)行了分析。 本文通過對(duì)家教服務(wù)合同的分析研究,得出了家教服務(wù)合同的內(nèi)涵,性質(zhì),試講階段的責(zé)任和授課服務(wù)瑕疵的責(zé)任,以期使實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的家教服務(wù)糾紛得到解決,家教市場(chǎng)得到規(guī)制。
[Abstract]:The prosperity of the family education market makes the practice of family education disputes increasing day by day, but our country does not have the corresponding laws and regulations to regulate, appeared the theory and the practice disjointed situation.This paper studies the family education service from the angle of contract law. In our country, it is mostly from the angle of pedagogy. The scholar Zhou Jianghong mentioned in his research on service contract that service contract is a kind of nameless contract.However, there is no clear stipulation in the contract law of our country. As a service contract, tutoring service contract, taken literally, is a kind of contract to provide tutoring service, the object of which is to impart knowledge and study methods.This paper studies the family education service contract, first of all, the outline of the family education service contract, defines the title, connotation and characteristics of the family education service contract.Secondly, it is the nature of the family education service contract. Through the family education service contract and the entrustment contract, this paper analyzes the general nature of the family education service contract, including the contract of contracting and the contract of employment.Then, it explains its special nature by discriminating between tutor service contract and education contract and education training contract.Finally, it is the responsibility of the tutoring service contract. Because of its particularity, the tutor service contract is divided into two stages: the trial lecture stage and the teaching service stage, according to this particularity,The responsibility is divided into trial stage responsibility and lecture service stage responsibility, respectively.The main research methods used in this paper are as follows: first, investigation and analysis.This paper makes an investigation and research on the tutoring service in real life and its own experience, and defines the contract of the tutoring service and analyzes the nature of the contract.Secondly, comparative analysis and research.When defining the general nature of the family education service contract, the author compares it with the entrustment contract, the contract of contracting and the contract of employment. When defining the special nature of the contract, the contract of home education service is compared with the contract of education.Education and training contracts are compared.Thirdly, interdisciplinary research.This paper focuses on the study of tutor service from the angle of contract law, but it will involve the contents of sociology and pedagogy. Therefore, the combination of law, sociology and pedagogy is the angle of view that this article must follow.The main innovation points of this paper are as follows: first, research angle innovation.In our country, the theoretical research on the family education service is focused on the pedagogy, few scholars study it from the angle of law, and this article analyzes the family education service from the angle of contract law.With a view to the practice of tutoring service disputes have regulations.Secondly, the innovation of research content.According to the particularity of tutoring service responsibility, the responsibility is divided into trial stage responsibility and teaching service responsibility, and analyzed separately.Based on the analysis and study of the tutor service contract, this paper concludes the connotation and nature of the family education service contract, the responsibility of the trial teaching stage and the responsibility of teaching service defect, in order to resolve the disputes of the family education service in practice.The tutoring market is regulated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 嬴舜堯;淺析教育服務(wù)合同[J];安順師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

2 李永軍;非財(cái)產(chǎn)性損害的契約性救濟(jì)及其正當(dāng)性——違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的二元制體系下的邊際案例救濟(jì)[J];比較法研究;2003年06期

3 夏雨;;雇傭合同和承攬合同的甄別[J];承德職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

4 王少俊;論違反附條件合同的民事責(zé)任[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年05期

5 高菲斐;;高校與學(xué)生合同關(guān)系——教育服務(wù)合同淺析[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年22期

6 周江洪;;服務(wù)合同的類型化及服務(wù)瑕疵研究[J];中外法學(xué);2008年05期

7 郭潔;承攬合同若干法律問題研究[J];政法論壇;2000年06期

8 趙旭東;論合同的法律約束力與效力及合同的成立與生效[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2000年01期

9 隋彭生;;論試用買賣的預(yù)約屬性[J];政治與法律;2010年04期

10 馬春元;;任意解除權(quán)的規(guī)制問題探討——兼論合同解除制度的重構(gòu)[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1722205