論買賣合同標的物滅失的風險負擔
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-12 20:49
本文選題:風險 切入點:風險負擔 出處:《黑龍江大學》2012年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:買賣合同是經濟全球化格局當中使用最為普遍的合同,與之相關聯(lián)的風險負擔制度便成為合同法的中心問題之一,世界各國的立法均對此制度給予了高度重視。在我國的合同法中,雖然有關于買賣合同標的物風險負擔的相關規(guī)定,但由于規(guī)定的內容并不全面,致使在實踐過程中,給當事人運用法律維護自身的合法權益造成了一定的困難。 本文首先對風險的概念、特點、風險事由的范圍進行界定。同時,對于目前存在的三大立法模式進行逐一評析,通過比對總結出相應模式的優(yōu)缺點。其次,將各國關于買賣合同標的物風險負擔一般規(guī)則與特殊規(guī)則的立法規(guī)定進行了詳細梳理。再次,也是本文的最大亮點在于,通過實證分析的方法,引出目前我國關于買賣合同標的物風險負擔規(guī)則的爭議焦點,,側重對“風險負擔的前提”、“違約時標的物風險負擔規(guī)則”、“路貨買賣時標的物風險負擔規(guī)則”和“涉及運輸時風險負擔規(guī)則”這四類情況進行分析,將外國先進立法規(guī)定與我國立法規(guī)定相比較,進而發(fā)現(xiàn)我國《合同法》關于標的物風險負擔規(guī)定之不足,并提出相應的完善建議,以期能夠對理論和實踐起到一定促進作用。
[Abstract]:Sale and purchase contract is the most common contract in the pattern of economic globalization, and the risk burden system associated with it has become one of the central problems of contract law. In the contract law of our country, although there are some relevant provisions on the risk burden of the subject matter of the contract for sale and purchase, the contents of the regulations are not comprehensive, resulting in the process of practice. To the parties to use the law to protect their legitimate rights and interests caused certain difficulties. In this paper, the concept, characteristics and scope of risk are defined. At the same time, the three existing legislative models are evaluated one by one, and the advantages and disadvantages of the corresponding models are summed up by comparison. The legislative provisions of the general rules and special rules on the risk burden of the subject-matter of sale and purchase contract are combed in detail. Thirdly, the biggest bright spot of this paper is that, through the method of empirical analysis, Leading to the current focus of our country on the subject matter of sale and purchase contract risk burden rules, Focusing on the "premise of the risk burden", the "risk burden rules on the subject matter at the time of default", the "risk burden rules on the subject matter in the sale of goods by road" and the "risk burden rules in relation to transport", By comparing the foreign advanced legislative provisions with those of our country, the author finds out the deficiency of the provisions on the risk burden of the subject matter in the contract Law of China, and puts forward corresponding suggestions for perfection, in the hope that they can promote the theory and practice to a certain extent.
【學位授予單位】:黑龍江大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D923.6
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前5條
1 王利明;中德買賣合同制度的比較[J];比較法研究;2001年01期
2 王軼;論買賣合同標的物毀損、滅失的風險負擔[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);1999年04期
3 李晶;違約對貨物風險轉移的影響——UCC與CISG相關條款對比分析[J];對外經貿實務;2003年05期
4 常鳳梅;違約對標的物風險轉移的影響[J];遼寧稅務高等?茖W校學報;2003年03期
5 段亞偉;;論物權變動與買賣合同標的物風險轉移的關系[J];鄭州航空工業(yè)管理學院學報(社會科學版);2009年03期
相關碩士學位論文 前7條
1 鄭潔;買賣合同標的物之風險負擔研究[D];華東政法大學;2010年
2 趙增輝;買賣合同風險負擔規(guī)則研究[D];鄭州大學;2005年
3 祝慶夢;買賣合同標的物風險負擔規(guī)則的研究[D];南昌大學;2008年
4 焦敏;買賣合同中的風險負擔規(guī)則研究[D];中國政法大學;2008年
5 周偉;論買賣合同風險負擔制度[D];西南政法大學;2009年
6 劉小宇;合同法中的風險負擔問題研究[D];山東大學;2009年
7 郭曉梅;交付主義模式下買賣合同風險轉移制度的分析[D];黑龍江大學;2010年
本文編號:1603245
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1603245.html