本文選題：優(yōu)先權　切入點：法定　出處：《西南政法大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：近年來，由于國家宏觀經(jīng)濟政策調(diào)控力度加大，執(zhí)行史上最嚴厲的調(diào)控政策——限購令等系列措施，我國房地產(chǎn)業(yè)逐漸轉(zhuǎn)入低潮，，房地產(chǎn)公司房屋面積銷售量及銷售金額出現(xiàn)了大幅度的下降，又由于房地產(chǎn)項目資本周轉(zhuǎn)周期較長，銀行融資也困難，導致很多小型開發(fā)商資金鏈斷裂，開發(fā)商拖欠承包人建設工程款，承包人拖欠農(nóng)民工工資的現(xiàn)象日漸增多，法院受理相關案件的數(shù)量也在逐步增多。此種社會問題已日益成為倍受關注的焦點。1999年10月1日，我國實施的《合同法》第286條，就建設工程款優(yōu)先權作了專門規(guī)定：“發(fā)包人未按約定支付價款，承包人可以催告發(fā)包人在合理期限內(nèi)支付價款。發(fā)包人逾期不支付的，除按照建設工程的性質(zhì)不宜折價、拍賣的以外，承包人可以與發(fā)包人協(xié)議將該工程折價，也可以申請人民法院將該工程依法拍賣。建設工程的價款就該工程折價或者拍賣的價款優(yōu)先受償�！�1之后，2002年6月最高人民法院又對《合同法》第286條的適用作出了《最高人民法院關于建設工程價款優(yōu)先受償權問題的批復》（以下簡稱《批復》），對承包人建設工程款優(yōu)先權的行使范圍、期間等進一步明確化。但是由于相關規(guī)定還比較籠統(tǒng)，實務界和理論界對該制度的有些問題仍然存在諸多爭議。特別是近年來，房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)由于國家宏觀調(diào)控的原因，發(fā)生了深層次的變化。因此，在房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)面臨嚴厲的政策調(diào)控之下，討論建設工程款優(yōu)先權制度有著深遠的理論和實踐意義。本文試圖從優(yōu)先權的概念、法律屬性及其特征開始討論，分析建設工程款優(yōu)先權的構成要件及其行使期限，并通過實務中的具體案例進行分析，最后提出完善建設工程款優(yōu)先權制度的一些建議。本文共分六個部分。
[Abstract]:In recent years, due to the intensification of national macroeconomic policy control and the implementation of a series of measures such as the most severe regulation policy in history, such as the purchase restriction order, the real estate industry in China has gradually turned into a low tide. The sales volume and the amount of sales of real estate companies' housing area have dropped by a large margin, and because of the long capital turnover period of real estate projects and the difficulty of bank financing, many small developers have broken the capital chain. The phenomenon of the developers defaulting on contractors' construction works, the phenomenon of contractors defaulting on migrant workers' wages is increasing day by day, and the number of cases handled by the courts is also gradually increasing. Such social problems have become the focus of more and more attention. In October 1st 1999, Article 286 of the contract Law, implemented in China, makes a special provision on the priority of construction payment: "if the contractor fails to pay the price as agreed, the contractor may be called upon to pay the price within a reasonable period of time. If the contractor fails to pay the price within a reasonable time limit, Unless it is not appropriate to discount the price according to the nature of the construction project, the contractor may agree with the contractor to discount the project by auction, It may also apply to the people's court to auction the project in accordance with the law. The price of the construction project will be preferentially compensated for the discount of the project or the price of the auction. "1. After that, in June 2002, the Supreme people's Court made a decision on the application of Article 286 of the contract Law. The "reply of the Supreme people's Court on the issue of the priority of the right to receive compensation for Construction Project Price" (hereinafter referred to as "approval"), the scope of exercise of priority over construction funds of the contractor, However, because the relevant regulations are still relatively general, there are still many disputes about some problems in the system among the practical and theoretical circles. In particular, in recent years, the real estate industry has been subjected to the reasons of the state's macroeconomic regulation and control. Therefore, it is of profound theoretical and practical significance to discuss the construction project priority system under the severe policy regulation in the real estate industry. This paper attempts to discuss the concept of priority from the perspective of the concept of priority. The legal attribute and its characteristics began to be discussed, the constitutive elements of the priority of construction project and the time limit for its exercise were analyzed, and the specific cases in practice were analyzed. Finally, some suggestions are put forward to improve the priority system of construction funds. This paper is divided into six parts.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 郭琦琦;淺析建筑工程承包人優(yōu)先受償權的性質(zhì)及適用[J];鐵道工程學報;2004年03期

本文編號：1570542