本文關鍵詞： 轉租 性質 立法模式 效力　出處：《煙臺大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：建立在房屋租賃基礎上的轉租，系指承租人不退出租賃關系而將租賃物之全部或部分復出租給第三人（次承租人），，供其使用、收益的行為。在市場經(jīng)濟高速發(fā)展的今天，轉租在日益成為房屋租賃市場資源優(yōu)化配置的重要方式的同時，各種問題和糾紛也相伴而生。在近現(xiàn)代各國法律或判例對轉租行為調整的過程中，形成了自由主義、限制主義及區(qū)別主義的立法模式。我國現(xiàn)行法律對轉租行為的規(guī)范主要依據(jù)為《合同法》第224條的規(guī)定，采限制主義立法模式。盡管2009年我國最高人民法院出臺了《關于審理城鎮(zhèn)房屋租賃合同糾紛案件具體應用法律若干問題的解釋》（以下簡稱《解釋》），對轉租制度做了進一步明確，但轉租制度的缺失仍難以滿足司法實踐中解決紛繁蕪雜的案件的需要。加之各地政策及法官素質、業(yè)務水平的不同，在審判實踐操作中存在諸多問題l6待解決。 本文首先從轉租的相關制度入手，由房屋租賃的概念、特征論及房屋租賃權的性質這一關系到轉租效力的問題，對租賃權的債權說、物權說及物權化說做了簡要介紹，并在物權及債權相關理論的啟發(fā)下，從促進交易、保護交易安全的角度得出結論，肯定租賃權的債權說；其次，本文通過對轉租與租賃權讓與、租賃權轉讓相關概念的辨析，強化了對轉租法律行為的界定，并結合我國現(xiàn)行法律的規(guī)定，對當今各國在調整轉租問題的過程中所形成的限制主義、自由主義和區(qū)別主義立法模式進行了闡述；最后，本文依《合同法》第224條的規(guī)定，將轉租的效力區(qū)分為合法轉租的效力和非法轉租的效力，并做了詳細的論述。在對轉租對當事人產(chǎn)生的效力進行闡述的同時，對存在的問題提出了個人深思卻仍不成熟的見解，以期可對我國轉租制度的完善提供可行性建議。
[Abstract]:Sublease on the basis of house lease means that the lessee rentals the whole or part of the leased property to a third party (sub-lessee) without withdrawing from the lease relationship. Today, with the rapid development of the market economy, Sublease is increasingly becoming an important way to optimize the allocation of resources in the housing rental market, at the same time, all kinds of problems and disputes also come into being. In the process of adjusting the sublease behavior in modern countries' laws or precedents, liberalism has been formed. The current law of our country on sublease behavior is mainly based on the provisions of Article 224 of the contract Law. Although in 2009, the Supreme people's Court of our country issued the interpretation of some issues concerning the Application of the Law in the trial of the dispute cases of Urban Housing Lease contract (hereinafter referred to as "interpretation"), which further clarified the sublease system. However, the absence of sublease system is still difficult to meet the need of resolving numerous and complicated cases in judicial practice. In addition, with the difference of policy and judge quality and professional level, there are many problems to be solved in trial practice. This paper begins with the related system of sublease, from the concept of housing lease, the characteristics of the property of the right to rent housing, which is related to the effectiveness of the sublease issues, the right to lease claims, property rights and the theory of property rights made a brief introduction. Inspired by the theory of real right and creditor's rights, the author draws a conclusion from the angle of promoting transaction and protecting the security of transaction, and affirms the claim of lease right. Secondly, this paper discriminates the related concepts of sublease and lease right transfer, lease right transfer. This paper strengthens the definition of the legal act of sublease, and combined with the provisions of the current law of our country, expounds the legislative models of restriction, liberalism and distinctionism formed in the process of adjusting the issue of sublease in various countries. According to Article 224 of contract Law, this paper divides the validity of sublease into the effect of legal sublease and the effect of illegal sublease, and makes a detailed discussion. This paper puts forward some personal and immature opinions on the existing problems in order to provide some feasible suggestions for the perfection of the sublease system in our country.
【學位授予單位】：煙臺大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳英容;轉租制度之探討[J];福建政法管理干部學院學報;2001年01期

2 關麗;;最高人民法院《關于審理房屋租賃合同糾紛案件具體應用法律若干問題的解釋》涉及的若干問題解析[J];法律適用;2009年10期

3 馮桂,黃瑩;房屋轉租合同的法律思考[J];法學;2002年09期

4 曾蕾;;論我國房屋租賃權的性質[J];法制與社會;2008年36期

5 梁艷;;未經(jīng)出租人同意之轉租行為論要[J];法制與社會;2009年35期

6 方晶;;租賃合同糾紛中轉租的認定[J];安徽電子信息職業(yè)技術學院學報;2007年02期

7 朱巍;;論房屋轉租——以《關于審理城鎮(zhèn)房屋租賃合同糾紛案件具體應用法律若干問題的解釋》為視角[J];河北法學;2010年05期

8 屈茂輝;轉租制度若干問題研討[J];湖南大學學報(社會科學版);2001年03期

9 吳進強;方健能;;房屋轉租相關法律問題的研究[J];黑河學刊;2008年02期

10 鐘小文;淺析轉租法律問題[J];華南師范大學學報(社會科學版);2004年04期

本文編號：1504061