論ICSID仲裁機制及完善
發(fā)布時間：2019-05-28 22:54
【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟全球化和一體化的不斷發(fā)展,國際投資日益成為世界經(jīng)濟舞臺上最重要的角色之一。多年的實踐證明,有閑置資本的發(fā)達國家和有資本缺口的發(fā)展中國家可以通過利用國際投資互通有無,取長補短,實現(xiàn)資本的優(yōu)化配置。資金短缺的資本輸入國利用國際投資促進經(jīng)濟和技術(shù)發(fā)展,資本輸出者通過跨國投資,獲得資金流動帶來的收益。國際投資在給資本輸出者和資本輸入國兩個微觀個體帶來積極經(jīng)濟效益的同時,在全球范圍內(nèi)推動了生產(chǎn)和資本的國際化,帶動全世界生產(chǎn)力的大發(fā)展。 國際投資具有與經(jīng)濟利益密切相關(guān)的性質(zhì),所以國際投資在發(fā)揮積極效應(yīng)的過程中不可避免的會帶來各種矛盾。實踐表明,外國投資者、東道國與投資者母國之間的摩擦?xí)r有發(fā)生。由于這種國際投資爭端與普通的國際商事爭端存在著很多不同之處,因此,不能簡單地通過普通國際商事仲裁方式解決。在這種背景之下,為了協(xié)調(diào)國際投資領(lǐng)域爭議雙方的利益沖突,解決投資爭議國際中心(International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes,簡稱“中心”或ICSID)應(yīng)運而生。ICSID的產(chǎn)生為外國投資者和東道國之間投資爭端解決提供了一種專門化、效率化的途徑。ICSID自1966年開始投入運作, 20世紀(jì)90年代后,受理的國際投資爭端案件數(shù)量急劇上升,在協(xié)調(diào)外國投資者私人利益與東道國國家利益的平衡關(guān)系上發(fā)揮著不可替代的作用.但隨著實踐的深入,ICSID仲裁機制本身逐漸暴露出了許多問題。在當(dāng)前國際投資自由化的大背景下,ICSID仲裁機制越來越被廣泛地運用在解決因日益增多的國際投資所帶來的各種爭端中,如何有效發(fā)揮ICSID仲裁機制自身固有的優(yōu)勢,改善不足,不僅僅是ICSID自身改革的重點,也是各國學(xué)者研究關(guān)注的焦點。本文從ICSID仲裁機制設(shè)置的目的出發(fā),從仲裁的管轄權(quán),法律適用,裁決的撤銷,裁決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行等方面分析了ICSID仲裁機制的基本框架。在ICSID仲裁機制的基本框架內(nèi),將ICSID仲裁機制與其他普通國際商事仲裁方式進行比較,總結(jié)異同,分析優(yōu)劣。結(jié)合現(xiàn)實,重點剖析ICSID仲裁機制因?qū)嵺`發(fā)展暴露出的種種缺陷:仲裁權(quán)不斷擴大導(dǎo)致仲裁裁決不一致,外部監(jiān)督機制的缺失,仲裁員傾向于保護外國私人投資者的利益忽視東道國國家的公共利益,嚴(yán)格保密原則導(dǎo)致仲裁公信力不足等問題。針對上述種種缺陷,本文提出了改善ICSID仲裁機制的建議,包括建立合并仲裁制度,增加外部監(jiān)督機制,平衡仲裁庭中發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家仲裁員的數(shù)量以扭轉(zhuǎn)過度保護私人投資者利益的現(xiàn)狀,區(qū)分仲裁程序所處的不同階段采取不同程度保密等措施。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of economic globalization and integration, international investment has increasingly become one of the most important roles on the world economic stage. Many years of practice have proved that developed countries with idle capital and developing countries with capital gaps can make use of international investment to learn from each other and make up for their weaknesses to achieve the optimal allocation of capital. Capital importing countries with shortage of funds use international investment to promote economic and technological development, and capital exporters obtain the benefits of capital flow through transnational investment. International investment not only brings positive economic benefits to two micro-individuals of capital exporters and capital importing countries, but also promotes the internationalization of production and capital on a global scale, and drives the great development of productive forces all over the world. International investment is closely related to economic interests, so international investment will inevitably bring all kinds of contradictions in the process of playing a positive effect. Practice shows that frictions between foreign investors, host countries and home countries of investors occur from time to time. Because there are many differences between this kind of international investment dispute and ordinary international commercial dispute, it can not be solved simply by ordinary international commercial arbitration. In this context, in order to coordinate the conflict of interest between the two sides in the field of international investment, the International Centre for the settlement of Investment disputes (International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes,) The emergence of ICSID provides a specialized and efficient way for the settlement of investment disputes between foreign investors and host countries. ICSID has been in operation since 1966, and after the 1990s, The number of international investment disputes accepted has risen sharply, which plays an irreplaceable role in coordinating the balance between the private interests of foreign investors and the national interests of the host country. However, with the deepening of practice, ICSID arbitration mechanism itself has gradually exposed many problems. Under the background of current liberalization of international investment, ICSID arbitration mechanism is more and more widely used to solve all kinds of disputes caused by increasing international investment. How to give full play to the inherent advantages of ICSID arbitration mechanism and improve it is insufficient. It is not only the focus of ICSID's own reform, but also the focus of scholars all over the world. Starting from the purpose of setting up ICSID arbitration mechanism, this paper analyzes the basic framework of ICSID arbitration mechanism from the aspects of jurisdiction, application of law, cancellation of award, recognition and enforcement of award, etc. Within the basic framework of ICSID arbitration mechanism, the ICSID arbitration mechanism is compared with other ordinary international commercial arbitration methods, the similarities and differences are summarized, and the advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. Combined with reality, this paper focuses on the defects of ICSID arbitration mechanism due to the development of practice: the continuous expansion of arbitration power leads to the inconsistency of arbitral awards, and the lack of external supervision mechanism. Arbitrators tend to protect the interests of foreign private investors and ignore the public interests of the host country. The principle of strict confidentiality leads to the lack of credibility of arbitration. In view of the above defects, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the ICSID arbitration mechanism, including the establishment of a consolidated arbitration system and the addition of an external supervision mechanism. Balance the number of arbitrators in developed and developing countries in order to reverse the status quo of excessive protection of the interests of private investors, distinguish between different stages of arbitration proceedings to take different degrees of confidentiality and other measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.4
本文編號：2487427
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of economic globalization and integration, international investment has increasingly become one of the most important roles on the world economic stage. Many years of practice have proved that developed countries with idle capital and developing countries with capital gaps can make use of international investment to learn from each other and make up for their weaknesses to achieve the optimal allocation of capital. Capital importing countries with shortage of funds use international investment to promote economic and technological development, and capital exporters obtain the benefits of capital flow through transnational investment. International investment not only brings positive economic benefits to two micro-individuals of capital exporters and capital importing countries, but also promotes the internationalization of production and capital on a global scale, and drives the great development of productive forces all over the world. International investment is closely related to economic interests, so international investment will inevitably bring all kinds of contradictions in the process of playing a positive effect. Practice shows that frictions between foreign investors, host countries and home countries of investors occur from time to time. Because there are many differences between this kind of international investment dispute and ordinary international commercial dispute, it can not be solved simply by ordinary international commercial arbitration. In this context, in order to coordinate the conflict of interest between the two sides in the field of international investment, the International Centre for the settlement of Investment disputes (International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes,) The emergence of ICSID provides a specialized and efficient way for the settlement of investment disputes between foreign investors and host countries. ICSID has been in operation since 1966, and after the 1990s, The number of international investment disputes accepted has risen sharply, which plays an irreplaceable role in coordinating the balance between the private interests of foreign investors and the national interests of the host country. However, with the deepening of practice, ICSID arbitration mechanism itself has gradually exposed many problems. Under the background of current liberalization of international investment, ICSID arbitration mechanism is more and more widely used to solve all kinds of disputes caused by increasing international investment. How to give full play to the inherent advantages of ICSID arbitration mechanism and improve it is insufficient. It is not only the focus of ICSID's own reform, but also the focus of scholars all over the world. Starting from the purpose of setting up ICSID arbitration mechanism, this paper analyzes the basic framework of ICSID arbitration mechanism from the aspects of jurisdiction, application of law, cancellation of award, recognition and enforcement of award, etc. Within the basic framework of ICSID arbitration mechanism, the ICSID arbitration mechanism is compared with other ordinary international commercial arbitration methods, the similarities and differences are summarized, and the advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. Combined with reality, this paper focuses on the defects of ICSID arbitration mechanism due to the development of practice: the continuous expansion of arbitration power leads to the inconsistency of arbitral awards, and the lack of external supervision mechanism. Arbitrators tend to protect the interests of foreign private investors and ignore the public interests of the host country. The principle of strict confidentiality leads to the lack of credibility of arbitration. In view of the above defects, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the ICSID arbitration mechanism, including the establishment of a consolidated arbitration system and the addition of an external supervision mechanism. Balance the number of arbitrators in developed and developing countries in order to reverse the status quo of excessive protection of the interests of private investors, distinguish between different stages of arbitration proceedings to take different degrees of confidentiality and other measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.4
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 胡玉凌;;商事仲裁的保密性研究[J];北京仲裁;2005年04期
2 魏艷茹;ICSID仲裁撤銷制度比較研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年23期
3 梁丹妮;;論國際投資爭端仲裁機制對東道國公共健康保護權(quán)力的挑戰(zhàn)[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2006年03期
4 劉筍;;論國際投資仲裁對國家主權(quán)的挑戰(zhàn)——兼評美國的應(yīng)對之策及其啟示[J];法商研究;2008年03期
5 蔡從燕;;外國投資者利用國際投資仲裁機制新發(fā)展反思——國際法實施機制與南北矛盾的雙重視角[J];法學(xué)家;2007年03期
6 林定坤;;從發(fā)展中國家的角度看國際投資爭端的解決機制[J];消費導(dǎo)刊;2007年06期
7 劉京蓮;;法庭之友參與國際投資仲裁體制研究[J];太平洋學(xué)報;2008年05期
8 李萬強;;《華盛頓公約》裁決撤銷理由的理解適用[J];仲裁研究;2007年01期
9 余勁松;詹曉寧;;論投資者與東道國間爭端解決機制及其影響[J];中國法學(xué);2005年05期
10 王勇;;論仲裁的保密性原則及其應(yīng)對策略[J];政治與法律;2008年12期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 陳榮;論國際投資爭端中的仲裁[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年
2 徐峰;ICSID改革與發(fā)展中國家[D];廈門大學(xué);2007年
3 馬曉婧;解決投資爭議國際中心仲裁機制研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2009年
，本文編號：2487427
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2487427.html
