【摘要】：國際投資爭端解決中心ICSID為解決有關(guān)國際投資的投資者與東道國之間的糾紛提供了一套有效的解決機(jī)制，對促進(jìn)國際投資爭端的合理解決有著十分重要的積極意義。從中心解決的案件來看，有很大一部分涉及非洲國家，這不僅是因?yàn)閲H投資的資金主要由相對發(fā)達(dá)國家流向相對欠發(fā)達(dá)國家，而且因?yàn)榉侵迖曳ㄖ企w系欠健全以及法律公正性的相對欠缺致使非洲地區(qū)成為國際投資爭端的高發(fā)地區(qū)。近年來，中非投資數(shù)量也呈大幅上升趨勢，我國對非直接投資不斷增加的同時(shí)，有關(guān)中國海外投資的糾紛也呈上升趨勢，因此，合理有效利用ICSID機(jī)制成為解決中非投資爭端需要重要考慮的問題，對中心爭端解決機(jī)制的分析研究對我國投資者利益合理有效的保護(hù)將起到十分重要的作用。 本文將涉及非洲國家參與ICSID仲裁的主要問題分為三大部分，“投資”界定，“管轄權(quán)”問題，以及涉及的非洲國家裁決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行問題。文章第二章主要目的是通過對中心有關(guān)“投資”定義產(chǎn)生爭議的案件分析，總結(jié)中心通過關(guān)于投資定義案件的處理確立管轄權(quán)的方式，分析相關(guān)的重要案情，從而對我國與非洲國家簽訂的投資條約中得“投資”界定提供有效的建議。文章第三章主要概括中心處理的有關(guān)非洲國家投資爭端的屬人管轄問題，根據(jù)相關(guān)的涉及非洲國家案件的處理分析屬人管轄的特點(diǎn)和發(fā)展，總結(jié)ICSID確立屬人管轄權(quán)的發(fā)展趨勢，對我國的投資主體的同意方式以及如何規(guī)定投資主體做出有利的提示。文章的第四章主要分析了涉及對非洲國家仲裁裁決執(zhí)行中出現(xiàn)的困難，揭示我國尋求對非洲國家仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行中可能出現(xiàn)的問題。文章的最后一章是對前三章分析的三大問題的總結(jié)，并結(jié)合中非投資現(xiàn)狀和中非投資條約分析我國應(yīng)對中非投資爭端中可能出現(xiàn)的問題以及應(yīng)當(dāng)如何完善中非投資條約，分別就“投資”界定、管轄權(quán)、仲裁裁決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行三部分對我國利用ICSID機(jī)制解決中非投資爭端提出相應(yīng)的建議，，對我國與非洲國家簽訂雙邊投資條約時(shí)內(nèi)容規(guī)定以及條款的完善進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的分析。
[Abstract]:The Center for the settlement of International Investment disputes (ICSID) provides an effective settlement mechanism for the settlement of disputes between investors and host countries related to international investment, which is of great positive significance to promote the rational settlement of international investment disputes. Judging from the cases resolved by the Centre, a large proportion of them involve African countries, not only because funds for international investment flow mainly from relatively developed countries to relatively less developed countries, And because of the imperfect legal system and the relative lack of legal fairness in African countries, Africa has become a high incidence of international investment disputes. In recent years, the amount of China-Africa investment has also shown a sharp upward trend. While China's indirect investment is increasing, disputes over China's overseas investment are also on the rise. Therefore, The rational and effective use of ICSID mechanism has become an important problem to be considered in the settlement of investment disputes between China and Africa. The analysis and study of the central dispute settlement mechanism will play a very important role in the reasonable and effective protection of the interests of investors in our country. In this paper, the main issues related to the participation of African countries in ICSID arbitration are divided into three parts: the definition of "investment", the issue of "jurisdiction", and the recognition and enforcement of African national awards. The main purpose of the second chapter of the article is to analyze the important cases related to the definition of "investment" through the analysis of the controversial cases concerning the definition of "investment" by the center, and to summarize the way in which the center establishes jurisdiction through the handling of the cases concerning the definition of investment. Thus, it provides effective suggestions for the definition of investment in the investment treaties signed between China and African countries. The third chapter of the article mainly summarizes the issues related to the personal jurisdiction of investment disputes in African countries dealt with by the Centre. According to the analysis of the characteristics and development of personal jurisdiction in the handling of cases involving African countries, this paper summarizes the development trend of establishing personal jurisdiction in ICSID. Make favorable tips on the consent mode of the investment subject in our country and how to stipulate the investment subject. The fourth chapter of the article mainly analyzes the difficulties involved in the enforcement of arbitral awards in African countries, and reveals the problems that may arise in the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in African countries. The last chapter of the article is a summary of the three major problems analyzed in the first three chapters, and analyzes the possible problems in China's response to China-Africa investment disputes and how to improve the China-Africa investment treaties in the light of the current situation of China-Africa investment and the China-Africa investment treaties. Three parts, namely, the definition of "investment", jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, put forward corresponding suggestions for China to use ICSID mechanism to solve investment disputes between China and Africa. This paper analyzes the perfection of the contents and provisions of bilateral investment treaties between China and African countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 祝海燕;;論我國雙邊投資條約對ICSID管轄權(quán)的接受[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

2 金成華;;評析國際投資爭端中心仲裁制度[J];國際商務(wù).對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

3 李萬強(qiáng);;ICSID管轄權(quán)行使的法律實(shí)踐與中國的對策[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)法論叢;2000年00期

4 梁詠;;海外直接投資中的中國投資者認(rèn)定之新探——從解讀ICSID數(shù)個(gè)著名案例的視角[J];國際商務(wù)研究;2008年02期

5 張光;;中國利用ICSID國際仲裁機(jī)制的立法思考[J];廣西財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

6 李先平;;雙邊投資協(xié)定中的爭端解決條款研究——我國應(yīng)在何種程度上接受ICSID的管轄權(quán)[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

7 袁海英;劉海燕;;解決投資爭議國際中心仲裁機(jī)制評析[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年08期

8 張瀟劍;;論ICSID仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

9 鄧婷婷;;國際投資仲裁中“投資者的期待”原則[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年05期

10 胡勇;秦麗;;“投資”定義與ICSID管轄權(quán)[J];宜賓學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉亙;中非雙邊投資條約（BIT）研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2010年

2 溫利卿;“解決投資爭端國際中心”管轄權(quán)制度研究[D];外交學(xué)院;2009年

本文編號：2481961