區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定與多邊貿(mào)易體制的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)
[Abstract]:The rapid development of new regionalism in the last decade reflects the twists and turns of the Doha Round negotiations and the difficult process of multilateral trade liberalization. Countries have turned their attention to participating in regional trade agreements, leading to a surge in the number of regional trade agreements worldwide. Based on the analysis of the legal status and development status of regional trade agreements, this paper focuses on the conflict and coordination between regional trade agreements and multilateral trading system and the strategies that China should adopt. The conflicts between RTAs and the multilateral trading system are mainly reflected in: the development of RTAs weakens the multilateral character of the multilateral trading system and greatly impacts the most-favoured-nation treatment principle at the core of WTO, as more and more RTAs occur. When multiple RTAs overlap, the complexity of rules of origin is further increased, so that the effect of trade liberalization is not fully apparent; Finally, there are conflicts between regional trade agreements and the dispute settlement mechanism of the WTO multilateral trading system, and it poses a severe challenge to the multilateral trade legal system of WTO. Regional trade agreements (RTAs) cause a diversion of the attention of members of the multilateral trading system (MTS) and thus become a stumbling block to the progress of the MTS. In view of the conflicts between the WTO multilateral trading system and regional trade agreements, China, as a developing country of WTO, should actively seek ways to coordinate conflicts, participate in economic integration and conclude regional trade agreements. Improving China's foreign trade environment; Secondly, we should perfect the relevant legislation of RTAs and promote the development of our country's foreign economic and trade by perfecting domestic legislation and utilizing two kinds of resources: multilateral trading system and RTAs. Finally, the provisions of the terms of authorisation are actively invoked, and the relevant matters of the terms of authorization are paid attention to at the same time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D996.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 邢立娟;;“新區(qū)域主義”與多邊貿(mào)易體制的沖突及協(xié)調(diào)[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2007年05期
2 馮雷,李玉舉;中國參與區(qū)域貿(mào)易安排:經(jīng)濟影響與國際比較[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2004年05期
3 廉曉梅;論區(qū)域經(jīng)濟一體化對經(jīng)濟全球化的促進作用[J];東北亞論壇;2003年05期
4 張潔;RTAs的新特點及對WTO的法律影響[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年09期
5 李先波;鐘月輝;;WTO爭端解決機制權(quán)力的擴張——幾類WTO爭端解決機構(gòu)管轄的特殊事項[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年06期
6 徐運良;論區(qū)域貿(mào)易組織與WTO爭端解決機制管轄權(quán)沖突的協(xié)調(diào)[J];福建廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報;2005年05期
7 鐘立國;GATT1994第24條的歷史與法律分析[J];法學(xué)評論;2003年06期
8 朱姝;蔡曉純;;中國與中亞區(qū)域經(jīng)濟合作爭端解決機制探析[J];法制與社會;2009年02期
9 李伯僑,盧書桃;CEPA:WTO框架下內(nèi)地和香港經(jīng)貿(mào)法律關(guān)系的新發(fā)展[J];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2003年03期
10 孫傳印,王青松;多邊貿(mào)易體制的改革與完善[J];工會論壇(山東省工會管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報);2005年03期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 楊長海;區(qū)域貿(mào)易集團與GATT/WTO多邊貿(mào)易體制研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2002年
2 于志遠;WTO體制下的區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年
3 陳樹元;論區(qū)域貿(mào)易協(xié)定及其對多邊貿(mào)易體制的影響[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年
,本文編號:2417507
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2417507.html