【摘要】：建議和裁決的執(zhí)行是WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的重要組成部分,而且是實(shí)現(xiàn)世界貿(mào)易組織宗旨或目標(biāo)的重要手段,而DSU所設(shè)置的合理期限制度則是促進(jìn)建議和裁決執(zhí)行的重要手段。確定合理期限的方式共有三種,仲裁方式是繼“當(dāng)事方協(xié)議”之后最常用的方式,迄今為止已有27個(gè)案例采用了這種方法,值得關(guān)注的是,最新案例DS414案是中國(guó)首個(gè)采用仲裁方法確定合理期限的案例。 本文試圖討論確定執(zhí)行期限之仲裁方式的程序與實(shí)體兩方面,尤其關(guān)注影響執(zhí)行期限的因素,并對(duì)DS414案之裁決和反映出的中國(guó)面臨的問題進(jìn)行分析,最后在此基礎(chǔ)上試圖對(duì)完善合理期限制度提出建議。全文共包括四章。 第一章是對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制下合理期限制度的一般介紹,首先是GATT時(shí)期的概況,其次是WTO時(shí)期DSU將合理期限制度的成文化及相關(guān)具體規(guī)定,最后對(duì)“裁決執(zhí)行的合理期限”的具體概念進(jìn)行了解讀。 第二章是本文的主體部分,第一節(jié)討論了仲裁方式的程序方面,包括仲裁的性質(zhì)、效力,仲裁員的權(quán)限、指導(dǎo)原則以及當(dāng)事方的舉證責(zé)任,第二節(jié)則是關(guān)于實(shí)體方面,重點(diǎn)介紹了實(shí)踐中影響具體執(zhí)行期限的各類因素。 第三章介紹了中國(guó)作為當(dāng)事方的首個(gè)DSU第21.3(c)條仲裁案,即DS414案,本章先是對(duì)中國(guó)入世后提交WTO解決的、已確定執(zhí)行期限的實(shí)踐進(jìn)行概況分析,然后分別從中方、美方與仲裁員主張入手對(duì)DS414案的裁決進(jìn)行分析,最后則嘗試為中國(guó)如何應(yīng)對(duì)合理期限問題提出管窺之見。 第四章以前三章為基礎(chǔ),第一節(jié)試圖總結(jié)出DSU現(xiàn)有合理期限制度存在的缺陷,第二節(jié)則針對(duì)上述缺陷一一提出可能的對(duì)策。 總之,本文試圖對(duì)確定“合理期限”的仲裁方式以及中國(guó)相關(guān)實(shí)踐進(jìn)行全面分析,肯定了“合理期限”制度的價(jià)值,同時(shí)指出其尚待完善之處,以期對(duì)理解和利用該制度有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The implementation of recommendations and awards is an important part of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and an important means to achieve the purpose or goal of the World Trade Organization, while the reasonable period system set by DSU is an important means to promote the implementation of recommendations and awards. There are three ways to determine a reasonable period of time, and arbitration is the most commonly used method following the Agreement of the parties, which has been used in 27 cases to date, and it is noteworthy that, The latest case, DS414, is the first in China to use arbitration to determine a reasonable time limit. This paper attempts to discuss the procedural and substantive aspects of the arbitration method for determining the duration of execution, paying particular attention to the factors that affect the enforcement period, and to analyze the decision of the DS414 case and the problems that China faces, which are reflected in the decision of the DS414 case. Finally, on this basis, attempts to improve the system of reasonable period of time put forward suggestions. The full text includes four chapters. The first chapter is the general introduction of the reasonable period system under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, first of all, the general situation of the period of GATT, secondly, the culture of the reasonable period system and the relevant specific provisions of DSU in the WTO period. At last, the author interprets the concept of "reasonable period of execution of award". The second chapter is the main part of this paper. The first section discusses the procedural aspects of arbitration, including the nature, effectiveness, authority of the arbitrators, guiding principles and the burden of proof of the parties, and the second section deals with the substantive aspects. This paper mainly introduces the various factors that affect the specific implementation period in practice. The third chapter introduces the first arbitration case of DSU Article 21.3 (c), that is, the DS414 case, to which China is a party. This chapter first analyzes the practice of China's submission to WTO for settlement after China's entry into WTO, and then analyzes the practice of determining the time limit for implementation, respectively, from the Chinese side. The United States and the arbitrators advocated the analysis of the DS414 decision, and finally tried to give a glimpse of how China should deal with the issue of a reasonable period of time. Chapter four is based on the previous three chapters. The first section tries to sum up the defects of the existing reasonable period system in DSU, and the second section puts forward the possible countermeasures against the above defects one by one. In a word, this paper tries to make a comprehensive analysis of the arbitration method of determining the "reasonable time limit" and the relevant practice in China, affirms the value of the "reasonable period" system, and points out that it still needs to be perfected. In order to understand and use the system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱翠微;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制執(zhí)行程序中的“合理期限”問題探討[J];長(zhǎng)白學(xué)刊;2002年01期

2 張乃根;試析WTO爭(zhēng)端解決的國(guó)際法拘束力[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年06期

3 許敏;;淺析WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制執(zhí)行中的“合理期限”問題[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年18期

4 呂洋;;論WTO爭(zhēng)端解決中的合理期限[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年09期

5 傅星國(guó);;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制裁決執(zhí)行的“第一步”——通報(bào)執(zhí)行裁決的意向[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2009年01期

6 傅星國(guó);;WTO裁決執(zhí)行的“合理期限”問題[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2009年02期

7 鄭小敏;論執(zhí)行DSB建議和裁決的合理期限[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

8 龔柏華;;中國(guó)與WTO爭(zhēng)端解決:2011年回顧與2012年展望[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2012年02期

9 張乃根;;試析WTO爭(zhēng)端解決的履行[J];武大國(guó)際法評(píng)論;2009年01期

10 李曉玲;執(zhí)行DSB建議和裁決的“合理期限”有多長(zhǎng)?[J];WTO經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2005年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫書玲;WTO仲裁決定合理執(zhí)行期限的考慮因素研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2416623