【摘要】：國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的國(guó)籍是國(guó)籍國(guó)法院對(duì)一項(xiàng)國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決具有撤銷(xiāo)權(quán)以及該仲裁裁決具有執(zhí)行效力的法律依據(jù)。國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決國(guó)籍的確定是一個(gè)重要的理論與實(shí)踐問(wèn)題。 一項(xiàng)國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決具有多項(xiàng)涉及國(guó)際因素的連接點(diǎn),根據(jù)各個(gè)連接點(diǎn)與內(nèi)國(guó)利益聯(lián)系程度的重要性,各個(gè)國(guó)家將其中的某個(gè)連接點(diǎn)作為確定國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決是否具有內(nèi)國(guó)國(guó)籍的參照標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。各國(guó)對(duì)仲裁裁決國(guó)籍的不同判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)產(chǎn)生了國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決國(guó)籍的沖突,包括國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決國(guó)籍的積極沖突和消極沖突。國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決國(guó)籍的沖突可以通過(guò)國(guó)際或國(guó)內(nèi)立法來(lái)進(jìn)行協(xié)調(diào)�！都~約公約》在尊重各個(gè)國(guó)家關(guān)于仲裁裁決國(guó)籍判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)“地域標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決國(guó)籍的積極沖突進(jìn)行協(xié)調(diào),通過(guò)“非內(nèi)國(guó)裁決標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決國(guó)籍的消極沖突進(jìn)行協(xié)調(diào)。 我國(guó)采用“仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”作為確立國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決國(guó)籍的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。這種標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對(duì)外表明我國(guó)在協(xié)調(diào)仲裁裁決國(guó)籍的沖突方面沒(méi)有履行公約的國(guó)內(nèi)法修正義務(wù),對(duì)內(nèi)不符合我國(guó)仲裁事業(yè)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實(shí)國(guó)情,這導(dǎo)致了理論的爭(zhēng)議和實(shí)踐的困境。在目前我國(guó)的仲裁理念和仲裁現(xiàn)實(shí)下,建議我國(guó)立法修改“仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”為“地域標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”作為確定國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決國(guó)籍的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:The nationality of an international commercial arbitration award is the legal basis on which the court of the country of nationality has the right to rescind an international commercial arbitration award and that the arbitral award has enforcement effect. The determination of the nationality of international commercial arbitration award is an important theoretical and practical issue. An international commercial arbitral award has a number of points of connection involving international factors, depending on the importance of the degree of connection between each of them and the interests of the home State, Each country uses one of the points of connection as a reference for determining whether an international commercial arbitration award has an internal nationality. The different standards of judging the nationality of the arbitration award in various countries have resulted in the conflict of the nationality of the international commercial arbitration award, including the positive conflict and the negative conflict of the nationality of the international commercial arbitration award. Conflict of nationality of an international commercial arbitration award may be coordinated through international or domestic legislation. The New York Convention is based on respect for national criteria for the determination of the nationality of arbitral awards, The positive conflict of the nationality of international commercial arbitration award is coordinated by "regional standard", and the negative conflict of international commercial arbitration award nationality is coordinated by "non-domestic standard of award". China adopts the Arbitration Institution Standard as the standard to establish the nationality of international commercial arbitration award. This standard shows that our country has not fulfilled the obligation of amending the domestic law of the Convention in coordinating the conflict of nationality of arbitration award, which does not conform to the actual situation of the development of arbitration cause in our country, which leads to the theoretical dispute and the dilemma of practice. Under the present arbitration idea and the arbitration reality in our country, it is suggested that our country legislate to amend the "standard of arbitration institution" to "regional standard" as the criterion of determining the nationality of international commercial arbitration award.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱克鵬;“非國(guó)內(nèi)仲裁裁決”的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行探析[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1996年01期

2 陳安;論中國(guó)涉外仲裁的監(jiān)督機(jī)制及其與國(guó)際慣例的接軌[J];比較法研究;1995年04期

3 肖威;;“非國(guó)內(nèi)化”仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行問(wèn)題研究[J];北京仲裁;2004年03期

4 周佳;;1958年《紐約公約》第一條述評(píng)——兼論我國(guó)仲裁法律體系下的國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的國(guó)籍[J];北京仲裁;2005年04期

5 宋連斌;董海洲;;國(guó)際商會(huì)仲裁裁決國(guó)籍研究——從最高人民法院的一份復(fù)函談起[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

6 王瀚;國(guó)際商事仲裁的非當(dāng)?shù)鼗碚撝轿鯷J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期

7 聶詠青;非內(nèi)國(guó)仲裁理論評(píng)論[J];法律適用;2005年09期

8 陳力;;ICC國(guó)際仲裁院在我國(guó)作成仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行——兼論《紐約公約》視角下的“非內(nèi)國(guó)裁決”[J];法商研究;2010年06期

9 肖永平;也談我國(guó)法院對(duì)仲裁的監(jiān)督范圍——與陳安先生商榷[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1998年01期

10 趙秀文;論ICC國(guó)際仲裁院裁決在我國(guó)的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[J];法學(xué);2005年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊弘磊;中國(guó)內(nèi)地司法實(shí)踐視角下的《紐約公約》問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊楠;國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的撤銷(xiāo)權(quán)歸屬問(wèn)題探析[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

2 徐慎莉;國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決國(guó)籍相關(guān)問(wèn)題之研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

3 占琳娜;“非國(guó)內(nèi)裁決”的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行問(wèn)題之研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

4 劉海南;論“非國(guó)內(nèi)化”仲裁理論[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2402527