論國際投資條約仲裁的正當性缺失及其矯正
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-03 14:05
【摘要】：隨著投資條約仲裁案件不斷攀升,國際投資法以及投資條約仲裁凸顯其重要性。但由于投資爭議的特殊性、有關(guān)實體法的模糊或缺失、程序法的缺陷,出現(xiàn)了投資條約仲裁的正當性危機。實際上危機一說有夸張之嫌。經(jīng)過制度化的改良,如通過增強仲裁程序透明度、允許法庭之友參與仲裁程序、合并審理、遵循先例、加強投資條約仲裁的公共功能等,投資條約仲裁制度的正當性缺失可在相當程度上得以矯正。同時,在國際投資實踐中還應(yīng)該細化投資條約的核心內(nèi)容、限制管理國家風(fēng)險、推動ADR和DPPs,以有效地防止爭議發(fā)生和降低爭議解決成本。
[Abstract]:With the increasing of investment treaty arbitration cases, international investment law and investment treaty arbitration highlight its importance. However, due to the particularity of investment disputes, the vagueness or absence of substantive law and the defect of procedural law, the legitimacy crisis of investment treaty arbitration appears. In fact, the crisis is exaggerated. Through institutionalized improvements, such as enhancing the transparency of arbitration procedures, allowing amicus curiae to participate in arbitration proceedings, merging hearings, following precedents, strengthening the public function of investment treaty arbitration, etc. The lack of legitimacy of the investment treaty arbitration system can be corrected to a certain extent. At the same time, in international investment practice, the core contents of investment treaties should be refined, the management of national risks should be limited, and ADR and DPPs, should be promoted to effectively prevent disputes and reduce the cost of dispute resolution.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)國際法研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社科重點研究基地重大項目“中國國家豁免立法問題研究”(項目編號:10JJD820004)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D996.4;D997.4
本文編號：2399480
[Abstract]:With the increasing of investment treaty arbitration cases, international investment law and investment treaty arbitration highlight its importance. However, due to the particularity of investment disputes, the vagueness or absence of substantive law and the defect of procedural law, the legitimacy crisis of investment treaty arbitration appears. In fact, the crisis is exaggerated. Through institutionalized improvements, such as enhancing the transparency of arbitration procedures, allowing amicus curiae to participate in arbitration proceedings, merging hearings, following precedents, strengthening the public function of investment treaty arbitration, etc. The lack of legitimacy of the investment treaty arbitration system can be corrected to a certain extent. At the same time, in international investment practice, the core contents of investment treaties should be refined, the management of national risks should be limited, and ADR and DPPs, should be promoted to effectively prevent disputes and reduce the cost of dispute resolution.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)國際法研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社科重點研究基地重大項目“中國國家豁免立法問題研究”(項目編號:10JJD820004)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D996.4;D997.4
【二級參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 白桂梅;國際強行法保護的人權(quán)[J];政法論壇;2004年02期
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉京蓮;;國際投資仲裁正當性危機之仲裁員獨立性研究[J];河北法學(xué);2011年09期
2 喬嬌;;走出投資條約仲裁的困境——平衡公法理論視野下的探討[J];新疆社科論壇;2011年02期
3 王彥志;;國際法上國家契約的法律保護[J];當代法學(xué);2010年06期
4 王彥志;;投資條約保護傘條款的實踐及其基本內(nèi)涵[J];當代法學(xué);2008年05期
5 沈志韜;;論國際投資仲裁正當性危機[J];時代法學(xué);2010年02期
6 陳詠梅;;論對發(fā)展中國家參與投資條約仲裁的援助[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年06期
7 楊慧芳;;投資者合理期待原則研究[J];河北法學(xué);2010年04期
8 王彥志;;國際投資爭端解決的法律化:成就與挑戰(zhàn)[J];當代法學(xué);2011年03期
9 謝寶朝;;投資仲裁上訴機制不是正當性危機的唯一解藥[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動態(tài)與研究;2009年04期
10 ;[J];;年期
，本文編號：2399480
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2399480.html
