《鹿特丹規(guī)則》對貨方影響評介與貨方利益維護
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-07 14:49
【摘要】：《聯(lián)合國全程或部分海上國際貨物運輸合同公約》(United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea)于2008年12月11日經(jīng)第63屆聯(lián)合國大會67次會議審議通過,根據(jù)大會決議的授權(quán),2009年9月23日在荷蘭鹿特丹舉行開放供簽署的儀式。與《海牙規(guī)則》以及《海牙-維斯比規(guī)則》相比,《鹿特丹規(guī)則》以統(tǒng)一國際運輸法律制度,明確各方權(quán)利義務(wù)為目的,因此對貨方權(quán)利義務(wù)規(guī)定也達到了前所未有的細致與明確。貨方權(quán)利義務(wù)的變化之大,需要引起注意。另據(jù)國家統(tǒng)計局數(shù)據(jù),十一五期間,海運貨物出口量躍居世界前列,我國不僅是船運大國同時也是貿(mào)易大國的地位應(yīng)無疑問。但在海運貿(mào)易實踐中,貨方分散而缺少有力的組織,像美國托運人協(xié)會歐洲托運人協(xié)會等貨方組織在中國大都缺少或不健全；貨主又以中小為主,特別江浙東南沿海等小貨主居多,法律權(quán)利意識淡薄,對國際公約知之甚少。相比之下船方大多談判力強,面臨強大的船方如何維護自己利益是一個值得關(guān)注的問題。因此本文從貨方的視角分析《鹿特丹規(guī)則》關(guān)于貨方權(quán)利義務(wù)的影響,審視其責任加重于否,并分析其影響,以期對貨方權(quán)利義務(wù)有更深入清楚的認識,從而有助于貨方在國際貿(mào)易中保障自身合法利益。 本文提取《鹿特丹規(guī)則》涉及貨方利益的主要條款及內(nèi)容,采用分析、比較、邏輯等方法,從貨方的視角審視《鹿特丹規(guī)則》,分析其中涉及貨方利益的主要條款的變化及對貨方的影響并進行評價,進而指出貨方在新的規(guī)則下如何趨利避害維護自己利益。
[Abstract]:The United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea was considered and adopted on 11 December 2008 by the 63rd session of the General Assembly of the United Nations at its 67th session. A ceremony opened for signature was held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009. Compared with the Hague rules and the Hague-Visby rules, the Rotterdam rules are aimed at unifying the legal regime of international transport and clarifying the rights and obligations of the parties, Therefore, the rights and obligations of the parties to the provisions have reached unprecedented detail and clarity. The changes in the rights and obligations of the consignor need to be noted. In addition, according to the data of the National Bureau of Statistics, the export volume of seaborne goods leapt to the top in the world during the 11th Five-Year Plan period. China is not only a shipping country but also a big trading country. However, in the practice of maritime trade, the cargo parties are scattered and lack of strong organizations, such as the European shippers Association of the United States shippers Association, and most of them are lacking or imperfect in China. Small and medium-sized cargo owners, especially in the southeast coast of Jiangsu and Zhejiang, such as small cargo owners, weak sense of legal rights, little knowledge of international conventions. By contrast, most of the ship negotiating power, facing a strong ship how to protect their own interests is a matter of concern. Therefore, this paper analyzes the impact of the Rotterdam rules on the rights and obligations of the shipper from the point of view of the shipper, examines whether its responsibilities are aggravated, and analyzes its impact, in order to have a deeper and clearer understanding of the rights and obligations of the consignor. In order to help the cargo in international trade to protect their legitimate interests. In this paper, the main terms and contents of Rotterdam rules concerning the interests of the shipper are extracted, and the Rotterdam rules are examined from the perspective of the shipper by means of analysis, comparison, logic and so on. This paper analyzes the changes of the main clauses involved in the benefit of the cargo party and their influence on the goods party, and then points out how the cargo party can seek advantages and avoid harm under the new rules to safeguard its own interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.19
本文編號：2367364
[Abstract]:The United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea was considered and adopted on 11 December 2008 by the 63rd session of the General Assembly of the United Nations at its 67th session. A ceremony opened for signature was held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009. Compared with the Hague rules and the Hague-Visby rules, the Rotterdam rules are aimed at unifying the legal regime of international transport and clarifying the rights and obligations of the parties, Therefore, the rights and obligations of the parties to the provisions have reached unprecedented detail and clarity. The changes in the rights and obligations of the consignor need to be noted. In addition, according to the data of the National Bureau of Statistics, the export volume of seaborne goods leapt to the top in the world during the 11th Five-Year Plan period. China is not only a shipping country but also a big trading country. However, in the practice of maritime trade, the cargo parties are scattered and lack of strong organizations, such as the European shippers Association of the United States shippers Association, and most of them are lacking or imperfect in China. Small and medium-sized cargo owners, especially in the southeast coast of Jiangsu and Zhejiang, such as small cargo owners, weak sense of legal rights, little knowledge of international conventions. By contrast, most of the ship negotiating power, facing a strong ship how to protect their own interests is a matter of concern. Therefore, this paper analyzes the impact of the Rotterdam rules on the rights and obligations of the shipper from the point of view of the shipper, examines whether its responsibilities are aggravated, and analyzes its impact, in order to have a deeper and clearer understanding of the rights and obligations of the consignor. In order to help the cargo in international trade to protect their legitimate interests. In this paper, the main terms and contents of Rotterdam rules concerning the interests of the shipper are extracted, and the Rotterdam rules are examined from the perspective of the shipper by means of analysis, comparison, logic and so on. This paper analyzes the changes of the main clauses involved in the benefit of the cargo party and their influence on the goods party, and then points out how the cargo party can seek advantages and avoid harm under the new rules to safeguard its own interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.19
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙月林,胡正良;論取消航海過失免責對承運人責任、義務(wù)和其他海事法律制度的影響[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2002年04期
2 陳光華;;《法國民法典》中物權(quán)變動的條件與效果[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年03期
3 邢海寶;;論中途停運權(quán)[J];法學(xué)家;1998年03期
4 胡正良;;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》對我國國際海上貨物運輸業(yè)的影響[J];海大法律評論;2009年00期
5 張晶;;試論海上預(yù)定運輸中托運人的義務(wù)[J];南方論刊;2007年06期
6 孫勇志;郭春風(fēng);;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》“適用范圍”的比較研究[J];青島遠洋船員學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期
7 李凌;;從承運人視角看《鹿特丹規(guī)則》[J];水運管理;2010年05期
8 胡長勝;;論《鹿特丹規(guī)則》批量合同下的貨方利益保護[J];武大國際法評論;2010年S1期
9 秦立崴;;《法國民法典》合同制度改革之爭[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2011年02期
10 Roy Goldberg,萬仁善,許民強;Vimar Seguros訴M/V.Sky Reefer案后撤銷外國法院管轄條款的嘗試[J];中國海商法年刊;2000年00期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 童玉梅;海運中途停運權(quán)研究[D];上海海運學(xué)院;2002年
，本文編號：2367364
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2367364.html
