【摘要】：無論是在國內(nèi)爭(zhēng)端解決中還是在國際爭(zhēng)端解決中,證據(jù)都發(fā)揮著重要的作用。對(duì)于WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制來說,專家組對(duì)事實(shí)問題作出客觀評(píng)估必須建立在充分證據(jù)的基礎(chǔ)上。但是WTO法律體系內(nèi)并沒有對(duì)相關(guān)證據(jù)規(guī)則作出統(tǒng)一明確的規(guī)定,爭(zhēng)端解決實(shí)踐中,對(duì)證據(jù)規(guī)則的發(fā)展也因各案的不同而引起很多爭(zhēng)議。 本文綜合運(yùn)用案例分析、比較分析、規(guī)范分析等多種研究方法,以WTO法律體系中關(guān)于證據(jù)規(guī)則的條款為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合具體案例中專家組和上訴機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)證據(jù)規(guī)則所作的解釋、說明,按照國內(nèi)證據(jù)法中的取證、質(zhì)證、舉證和認(rèn)證四個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決中的證據(jù)規(guī)則進(jìn)行詳細(xì)分析。然后針對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決證據(jù)規(guī)則的完善提出個(gè)人建議,并且指出其對(duì)我國的啟示,使我們?cè)谶\(yùn)用WTO爭(zhēng)端解決時(shí)更好地維護(hù)我國的國家利益,并促進(jìn)多邊貿(mào)易體制的順利運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)。 除前言外,本文分為四個(gè)部分,首先對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制中證據(jù)規(guī)則做以概述,然后對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制中的證據(jù)規(guī)則進(jìn)行分析,并對(duì)證據(jù)規(guī)則的完善以及對(duì)我國的啟示進(jìn)行了討論,最后得出結(jié)論。 第一部分,WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制證據(jù)規(guī)則概述。在該部分中,首先對(duì)證據(jù)規(guī)則的概念進(jìn)行介紹,然后對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制中的證據(jù)規(guī)則的重要性和淵源進(jìn)行了分析。 第二部分,WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制證據(jù)規(guī)則分析。這是論文的主體部分,這部分依據(jù)司法證明過程對(duì)取證規(guī)則、質(zhì)證規(guī)則、認(rèn)證規(guī)則和舉證規(guī)則進(jìn)行詳細(xì)論述,并分析了在爭(zhēng)端解決實(shí)踐中產(chǎn)生的問題,為第三部分對(duì)證據(jù)規(guī)則的完善做以鋪墊。最后對(duì)貫穿于該過程中的證據(jù)保密規(guī)則做以闡述。 第三部分,WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制證據(jù)規(guī)則的完善及其對(duì)中國的啟示。通過第二部分對(duì)實(shí)踐中相關(guān)問題的分析,在此提出證據(jù)規(guī)則完善的建議,并提出對(duì)中國的啟示,以其對(duì)我國參與爭(zhēng)端解決有所幫助。 第四部分,結(jié)論。該部分總結(jié)了正文中的觀點(diǎn),提出：雖然WTO法律體系沒有關(guān)于證據(jù)規(guī)則的統(tǒng)一明確的規(guī)定,但是專家組和上訴機(jī)構(gòu)在爭(zhēng)端解決的實(shí)踐中豐富并發(fā)展了WTO證據(jù)規(guī)則并逐漸形成體系,對(duì)以后的爭(zhēng)端解決具有很強(qiáng)的指導(dǎo)作用。WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制證據(jù)規(guī)則包括規(guī)則淵源、取證規(guī)則、質(zhì)證規(guī)則、認(rèn)證規(guī)則、舉證規(guī)則和證據(jù)保密規(guī)則等方面的,并且該規(guī)則體系在以后的爭(zhēng)端解決實(shí)踐中將會(huì)逐漸完善。
[Abstract]:Evidence plays an important role in both internal dispute settlement and international dispute settlement. For the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, the panel must base its objective assessment on the facts on the basis of sufficient evidence. However, there are no uniform rules of evidence in the legal system of WTO. In the practice of dispute settlement, the development of the rules of evidence has caused a lot of controversy because of the different cases. This article synthetically uses the case analysis, the comparative analysis, the norm analysis and so on many kinds of research methods, based on the WTO legal system about the evidence rule clause as the foundation, unifies the concrete case the expert group and the appellate body to make the explanation to the evidence rule, explains, The rules of evidence in WTO dispute settlement are analyzed in detail according to the four links of evidence collection, cross-examination, proof and authentication in domestic evidence law. Then, the author puts forward personal suggestions on the perfection of WTO dispute settlement evidence rules, and points out its enlightenment to our country, so that we can better safeguard our country's national interests and promote the smooth operation of multilateral trading system in the application of WTO dispute settlement. In addition to the foreword, this paper is divided into four parts. Firstly, the evidence rules in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism are summarized, and then the evidence rules in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism are analyzed. The perfection of the rules of evidence and the enlightenment to our country are discussed, and the conclusion is drawn. The first part is an overview of the evidence rules of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. In this part, firstly, the concept of evidence rule is introduced, and then the importance and origin of evidence rule in WTO dispute settlement mechanism are analyzed. The second part, the WTO dispute settlement mechanism evidence rule analysis. This is the main part of the thesis, which discusses in detail the rules of evidence, cross-examination, authentication and proof according to the process of judicial proof, and analyzes the problems arising in the practice of dispute settlement. For the third part to improve the rules of evidence to do to pave the way. In the end, the rules of confidentiality of evidence throughout the process are expounded. The third part, the perfection of WTO dispute settlement mechanism evidence rules and its enlightenment to China. Based on the analysis of the related problems in practice in the second part, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the rules of evidence and gives some enlightenment to China in order to help our country to participate in the dispute settlement. The fourth part, conclusion. This part summarizes the points in the text, and points out that although the WTO legal system does not have a uniform and clear provision on the rules of evidence, However, in the practice of dispute settlement, the panel and the appellate body have enriched and developed the WTO rules of evidence and gradually formed a system, which has a strong guiding role for the future dispute settlement. The rules of evidence of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism include the origin of the rules. Evidence rules, cross-examination rules, authentication rules, evidential rules and evidence secrecy rules, and this rule system will be gradually improved in the practice of dispute settlement in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 楊默;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制中的舉證責(zé)任規(guī)則[J];法律適用;2004年03期

2 余敏友,席晶;論WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制中的證據(jù)規(guī)則(下)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2003年06期

3 趙維田;舉證責(zé)任——WTO司法機(jī)制的證據(jù)規(guī)則[J];國際貿(mào)易;2003年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 呂微平;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的正當(dāng)程序研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2362109